Jump to content

Cowanthebluenose

Gold Members
  • Posts

    418
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Cowanthebluenose

  1. For Scotland - Colin Hendry.

    For Scotland in midfield - Paul Lambert.

    Top of the head names - both better and more successful players than Sideways Bazza.

    Oh, and neither of them were disrespectful wee cúnts who undermined both club and National management.

    Colin Hendry the same generation as ferguson? His best days were at blackburn. Great player. Successful? Hmmm.

    Lambert was a fine player, but the fact you suggest ferguson passed the ball sideways at every given chance shows you up perfectly.

    Ferguson had excellent distribution.

    And the last part of your post is what I'm suggesting you've based your opinion on. So I've lost all credibility because you can name two players, one of whom had his prime before Ferguson was a mainstay. When Hendry signed for us he was all but finished. I remember him playing up front one game. It was fun.

  2. Well, that's you thrown the last of your credibility out in one fell swoop.

    Well done you made a post with sidetracking and stayed on subject. But there is nothing to back up your claim why don't you enter into debate with me on this one. Present any player who was better than Barry Ferguson from Scotland. I certainly can't think of anyone.

    A great all round midfielder. Carried Rangers and Scotland many a time. It's sad there isn't a player of his calibre in the Scottish league at the moment in all honesty.

  3. TBH any argument about genuine beliefs coming from fans that help up a red card to liquidation and then pretend their old club is still alive and nothing happened ... cannot be taken seriously.

    Their stance changes with the direction of the wind on a good day ...

    Lets be honest if Rangers weren't still alive and a new club your obsession levels, hatred and foruming are all highly worrying for something completely new.

    The Rangers :thumsup2

    The Confused Celtic Fans :lol:

    WRK :lol:

    Mikewellfan :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

    BRING BACK KILT

  4. I love the way you are trying to claim that anyone has at any time claimed that the 'normal' clubs can compete with the resources Celtic have.

    The last few pages have firmly confirmed that the league is 'competitive' in as far as that all the clubs are competing with each other to perform as well as they can and to finish as high up as they can.

    One huge club miles clear of the rest is just the same as two huge clubs miles clear of the rest.

    You choose to wilfully ignore these last few pages.

    It has been pretty good this season, so far. Lots of positives.

    Perhaps it is the lack of yon arrogant,corrupt and all-round malign club from Govan that makes it so pleasant.

    Nobody wins unless everyone wins eh.

  5. Sorry mate but Foster is utter ****. End of.

    You cant comment on Smith then as he never gets a game.

    McLeod, OK I'll give you that one. looks ok in a lower teir though.

    Hutton, Champions League ? How long ago was that????

    The rest of them (especially Faure) were part of a side that failed in numerous cup competitions and were poor at times in the lowest league in scottish football.

    As for AFC, sorry, but we aint anywhere near administration. dream on.

    ^^ Post full of lies. Don't know where to begin.

  6. Foster and Smith ??????.

    Foster is dire and Smith rarely gets a game (or has never been involved when I have watched Sevco)

    Also, the list of youngsters you provided. Seriously, I saw a few of those last season and they are very poor.

    _53905627_foster282.jpg

    Foster has been a better player for Rangers than he has been at Aberdeen. Smith is cover for the outstanding Lee Wallace.

    As for the youngsters. You didn't watch them if you think that. And if you did then you are a moron. Mcleod is probably our best player. Hutton has played in the CL for us away at old trafford and was arguably the best player on the park. Crawford is a great footballer, Faure is a really good centre half, Perry has played numerous games for us in the SPL the rest are 17 and contributed greatly. I didn't just pick names out a hat from our youths.

    Now away and start an Aberdeen pending Administration thread.

  7. How do you see rangers affording a budget to compete with celtic?

    Recent history (last 20 years) since the game has changed financial, shows that rangers were only able to compete by using EBTs, funding from MIM and not paying their tax.

    How much extra income would rangers get in the top division compared to now, but adversely, how much would their outgoings increase?

    Surely a financially prudent model, will not allow them to compete as a top 2 team.

    Can't really comment on what Rangers will be doing financially until after the AGM and board issues are over.

    As for the baddies, well if they keep popcorn teeth in charge and allow him to sign all of his wonderplayers I reckon we could sign the entire cast of the Renford Rejects and be able to compete with them. They are as poor a Celtic side as I can remember. Celtic always have had that one striker who you'd hate to see in the line up. Sometimes two.

    I think they'd rather have Jon Daly.

  8. Fair do's - let's start a wee debate then:

    Having watched the previous owner spend excessively to feed , not only his own ego, but the combined ego's of the blue side of what was once referred to as "The Old Firm" do you see any similarities with the people currently (note the correct spelling, to avoid childish sneering) in charge?

    Do you, personally, see the urgency in outspending revenue as a necessity to achieve success, albeit on the very limited scale that is Scottish Football?

    Do you think the suits in charge recognise the opportunity that TRIFC represents in terms of generating returns on investment as against the fans'desire for success at all and ANY cost? Does this conflict of outcomes flag up any warnings in your head ?

    ...

    The blame lies initially at David Murray's door for the mess we got into. He flexed his chequebook far too much. There was a time, initially after he took over when we could afford it. Just now I do think we have overspent, obviously not to the ridiculous state that we have done. I have said that money should have been better invested in our scouting system and youth recruitment as opposed to signing players like Cribari. For what its worth, players like Foster, Smith etc which expire next year are better business rather than the 5 year deals in the past.

    The outspending of our revenue is a complete grey area. We need to know where the money is going. Once all the leeches and boardroom drama has settled (no laughing at the back) we might actually know what is being spent where and on what. However, players like Daly and Law are a joy to watch at the moment.

    It's probably a mirror of my previous posts. Live within our means, we are still a massive club and can attract good players (lets be honest, it is an SPL or whatever it is called now squad that we have). Hopefully with the likes of Mcleod, Aird, Hutton, Stoney, Gasparotto, Faure, Perry, Crawford we will have great options with the experience they are gaining and not needing to strengthen more next season.

    The AGM is crucial for the future of Rangers. I think everyone knows that.

  9. I don't "trawl". I remember. ;)

    But perhaps you could summarise, your "views" for me (us all even) on the items I listed ? You never know, you might come across as a fan who has serious and genuine concerns about the way this Board are running the club.

    You might EVEN be of the opinion that the excessive spending may lead to a second (or first ;) ) Admin ?

    Is it plausible that you think the overbearing drive to have a rapid progression to the Premier League forces you (the Club) to massively outspend it's resources in chasing a prize worth less than half the value of what you spend to achieve it?

    Or is the answer.....'B'

    ;)

    You obviously don't remember if you need me to repost what I've said mate!!

    And I may repost should the debate arise again. If a debate ever arises again on this thread. It seems to be a congregation of diddies using this area to post the same things on a daily basis to aid their post counts.

  10. I don't "trawl". I remember. ;)

    But perhaps you could summarise, your "views" for me (us all even) on the items I listed ? You never know, you might come across as a fan who has serious and genuine concerns about the way this Board are running the club.

    You might EVEN be of the opinion that the excessive spending may lead to a second (or first ;) ) Admin ?

    Is it plausible that you think the overbearing drive to have a rapid progression to the Premier League forces you (the Club) to massively outspend it's resources in chasing a prize worth less than half the value of what you spend to achieve it?

    Or is the answer.....'B'

    ;)

    You obviously don't remember if you need me to repost what I've said mate!!

    And I may repost should the debate arise again. If a debate ever arises again on this thread. It seems to be a congregation of diddies using this area to post the same things on a daily basis to aid their post counts.

  11. My significance - or otherwise - is of zero concern to me, but thanks for your concern.

    Your clearly displayed desire to be a (very poor) imitation of P&B's very own Mr Angry is making you look like a wee ned hiding behind a bigger ned. Whilst this is mildly amusing on slow news days it does you little credit if you are actually trying to get a RELEVANT (to the thread title) point across.

    But of course... you were'n't.

    Again.

    Your thoughts on the Agenda for the AGM ? The facility to issue (new) diluted shares? The appointment (possibly) of additional directors? The Gangster on your Board? The remaining Ticketus/Octopus former employee on your Board? Investor activists (Laxey Partners) increasing their hold on your Board?

    Yada yada yada ??

    Pardon ?

    IF you care to trawl through this thread you will see them sweetheart xx

  12. Celtic/Rangers, Rangers/Celtic Forum.... Scots in Europe Forum for, YET MORE, of yer pish thanks.

    Bendy doing enough whitabootery for the entire Orc Nation.... the position has been filled,

    You must be a very insignificant poster if you have that many posts yet I can't remember seeing you. How cute though, you are using the pish chat from the forum that was crap four years ago. 2009 forum for this pish ;)

  13. Follow Follow You will Follow SpivCo

    Any time Anywhere, you will follow on

    Paying anyone who calls themselves "The Rangers"

    You will follow anyone who leads you on.

    For there's now not a team that's called Glasgow Rangers

    No not one and there never will again.

    We ALL know all about their troubles

    We just laugh as they come undone

    For there's now not a team that's called Glasgow Rangers

    No not one and there never will again.

    Hello ! Hello! We are The SpivCo boys

    Hello! Hello! We've sold all our toys

    We're up to our necks in worthless shares, bought into every lie

    We are the Gulibility Boys....

    8) Coming to a cup final near you soon..... ;)

    And this is why you don't do drugs kids.

×
×
  • Create New...