ie Lets get back to the football, but not before the anti racist racists we have the last word on racism. But lets see who's defensive and racist:
So, if Blaize is compaired to Marv because they're both big guys with a robust playing style – THAT'S RACISM!
But if it's pointed out that say, Kai Kennedy and Dan Armstrong, who are both slight guys and have a quick tricky style of play, that's NOT racism.
Why do “unconscious” or “cognitive biases” come into play in one scenario but not in the other identical scenario? Ah I get it, you've got to point out that the first involve black people. Who's unconsciously biased and racially motivated? Can't you see that it's people like you who are racist, so brainwashed by an arrogant assumption of moral superiority that you're blind to simple fact and logic?
You believe the generalisation “that black players are much more likely to be associated with concepts such as strength, pace and athleticism”, but it's subtly racist to make that observation - we need to have a “hope of tackling and changing the generality”. So you claim these racial characteristics exist but if they pertain to black people we are to deny they exist or we're racist ! YOU'RE RACIST FFS
This next bit is what in Burger King is known as a Whopper, with cheese:
Standing “shoulder with RATM” on the current matter, it's your “general experience that those who react angriest and are quickest to dismiss any such possibility are the ones least likely to have understood the nature of the problem“::
RATM: “NO! f**k! OFF!
BLACK PLAYERS DON'T IMMEDIATELY HAVE TO BE COMPARED TO OTHER BLACK PLAYERS! FOR f**k SAKE! WE ARE NOT DOING THIS AGAIN!
The blind hypocrisy is boundless.