Slartibartfast
-
Posts
56 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Store
Posts posted by Slartibartfast
-
-
Just occurred to me that the SFL should refuse to do anything until the SPL/SFA have actually dealt with the Oldco. It's their bloody problem, after all.
I think the SFA should be first - after all if they reject the transfer then any votes by the SPL or SFL are mute. The SPL would obviously be second.
Dear Whatever You're Now Called
Look at these figures and weep, ya glory-hunting twats. This is why you will never ever reach the level of your beloved brethren in the East End who support their club through thick and thin and quite rightly claim the title of "Best Fans Ever In The Whole World....Ever" and which we all unreservedly concur with.
Aye, and we all believe you're really a Hearts supporter - fucking clown.
0 -
And this is my 39th.
0 -
Go into the SPL General Chatter section, and alongside the thread it will have however many replies this thread has had. It should be around the 65,000 mark, click on that and it'll tell you.
This is my 38th.
0 -
There was a show of hands at the end. SPL/SFL1/SFL3 were the three options. I'd reckon 5% 70% 25% was the voting share.
How many were there?
70% for SFL1?? FFS tell me you're joking. I'd rather get relegated and spend another decade out of the top flight than bend over for these cheating c***s.
I didn't think we had many players on contracts past the end of next season so why would we be likely to lose up to £1.1m. Could we not just get Thompson to apply for another "loan" from his EBT??
0 -
Stuart Gilmour said tonight that the best option for St Mirren would be:
1. Sevco go to the first division next season.
2. SPL expands to 14 next year - 3 up, one down.
3. SPL expands to 16 year after - 3 up one down.
Basically St Mirren would not vote for current proposals if in e.g. Falkirk's position, but SFL clubs position could change with the above proposals on the table.
He was also quite scathing of Doncaster{in general) and Regan ( for going on 2 week holiday at this time).
I still voted for the div 3 option, although felt a bit Swedish while doing so.
Was there a vote at that meeting tonight??? I got held up (no, not at gunpoint) and couldn't make it.
Your chairman isn't very bright is he?
They were two-year contracts signed last summer - you know, before all this shit started.
Caught up at lunchtime, expected a fairly large number of posts in reaction to today's meeting/predictions for tomorrow's meeting.
...
Rant over. Sorry peeps, the rage is strong tonight.
Agree with every word - even the stuff I deleted (sorry, it was just too long to quote).
I really cannot understand how Gilmour can still spin the line about St Mirren going into administration if Rangers go into Division 3 when if St Mirren were relegated they'd have no Old Firm to suckle off at all yet would survive easily - in the current scenario they will still have Celtic, and one less better competitior to face!
Risk of shortfall in money? Put your prices up to cover for it, not just at the gate, but the catering, where fans will buy just about anything on a match day (even if just to kill the time waiting for the second half) - it's not as if St Mirren are exactly allergic to doing that. Plus does he not think in all seriousness that there won't be a lot of "born again" St Mirren fans amongst the orcs when they're in Division 3 whilst St Mirren remain in Division 1?
FFS have we been relegated??? Is this the orcs revenge starting already?
0 -
RangersMedia thread.
Dear Steven Naismith,
I read with increasing agitation and anger your statement about your objection to transfer to the "newco" Rangers under a TUPE transfer.
However, before moving on to that statement, I would like to start by making one thing clear –I have absolutely no issue with you leaving the football club. Indeed, I believe that should you and other high earners stay, the protection to your salary afforded under the TUPE legislation may well kill my football club. Added to that fact, your very generous agreement to accept a wage reduction last season kept alive hopes of exiting administration via a CVA route. I thank you and your colleagues for that sacrifice.
However, I cannot countenance (that means "understand" Steven) why you came out and said the things you did in your statement. You stated that you believe you owe "no loyalty" to the "newco" because it "has no history". Notwithstanding the damage that this kind of "no history" statement inflicts on the club and fans, your assertion about loyalty is astounding and baffling to say the least.
Perhaps you can enlighten me on a few issues and perhaps you can explain to me how you feel about the following situations:
1 –In times gone you may have walked out of your large house into one of the many luxury cars that was paid for by Rangers Football Club, drove to Murray Park, ate your staff meals prepared by the kitchen staff and wore your freshly cleaned and pressed training kit. Let me ask you this - did you thank the corporate body that paid your wages, or paid the wages of the staff who pampered you? No. You praised yourself for the hard work you put in at Kilmarnock, the Rangers manager who signed you and the individual staff involved for looking after you so well. You may well have paused and and thanked the institution that is Rangers Football Club for the privileged position you held –but I'll bet £1000 of my money against £10 of yours that you didn't pause and thank the corporate body who owned Rangers
2 –You have previously had 2 lengthy spells on the sidelines with injury in your time at Rangers. I would imagine you were grateful for the contract which saw you receive full pay as well as unparalleled access to medical specialists and physio to speed up your return. I imagine it took great mental fortitude (strength, Steven) on your part to come through that. Again though, let me ask you this –did you thank the corporate body who paid your wages on time, or who paid for access to that unparalleled medical support? No, of course not. You would have thanked your agent for negotiating the contract and accepted that it was part and parcel of the standard of treatment you receive as a player of Rangers Football Club. Who provides that excellence Steven –is it a corporate body, or is it the staff involved and the culture of success ingrained in an institution over 140 years? You know the answer.
3 –And on to your teammates and manager Steven. During the wins, the losses, the titles, the heartbreak and the European adventures –did you win and lose as a team with your teammates and manager? Of course you did. Did the corporate body that oversaw all of those achievements, mishaps and adventures cross your mind then Steven? No, it did not.
4 –The fans Steven. Did we die with the old corporate body? Did we pass away when Sevco transferred all of the Rangers history, memories, staff, stadium, training ground into a new corporate body? Did the fans who worshipped you suddenly become obsolete, a thing of the past, something that no longer exists? No we did not.
With all of that in mind, I find myself wanting to ask you the following question:
Why is the name of the corporate body owning Rangers Football Club suddenly such an issue to you?
The answer is very, very obvious. It was never an issue for you before. Quite simply, it no longer suits your footballing ambition to be employed by a football club who may be playing outwith the SPL and Europe for the next 3 seasons.
I actually understand that rationale and wish you had said that, and only that. Leave, by all means –there's the door. We will carry on without you.
The thing is Steven; I've proven to you that the great institution that was Rangers Football Club is the same today as it was yesterday.
Insulting our intelligence by claiming otherwise, just to suit your own selfish agenda, was the worst possible way to say goodbye.
I got as far as the bit in bold which then gave it away that it was from RM. Thick f**k.
0 -
Naw charles green
Greens BS at it's best! I mean really, "two liquidators from accountants BDO have already been lined up at the behest of HMRC to wind up the existing company and pursue avenues to recover cash for creditors." That would be for Ibrox and Mp to be sold seeing as green was/is just takeing the utter piss!
Everyone apart from deluded bluenoses have known from the start that he is full of shit. We all knew about Whyte too, while they were all treating him like a fucking hero - well, now he's our hero.
0 -
Sweet! I'm unemployed, I'll be garanteed a hot meal every day and a warm bed then. Humm how much comual sky is? Need to ask around to make sure we get enough folk or they won't put it in
Hope the cell's are en-suite dinna want to get done in the shite pipe in the showers! You seemed so sensible in your first post.
That is the effect of P&B.
Now you're one of us.
0 -
Uneducated fool.. You cant read..
Irony at its best.
0 -
Don't know how you can possibly see whether her chinchilla hood is trimmed or not,
Here's the full thing - you decide.
Which of these do you think is more like TeeBear (Magee)?
OR 
0 -
Don't know how you can possibly see whether her chinchilla hood is trimmed or not,
:lol: 0 -
I just came on in a friendly way .. one of your posters insinuated my 11 year old child had a baby.. FFs was only allowed out of the gate 3 weeks ago
To go to hospital to give birth to your 3 week old grandchild. We know, you've already told us. Why you think we actually care about your family's depraved behaviour, I'm not sure, but you obviously like airing your dirty linen in public so, wire in (no, you better not, getting wired in is why your 11 year old has a child).
0 -
Iv now saved this search to my favourites
All I could find was this...
or this "nurse" wearing a chinchilla-trimmed hood...
I know which on I prefer.
0 -
no you wont... You could never be a paedo.. Paedos have all gone under the matress x
Don't you mean cum on top of the mattress?
0 -
Im googling the f**k out of that now
:lol: Bet you find it.
0 -
Surely your not suggesting the one night magump isn't all over this site is the one night this person appears?
Surely?
I think Magee is an alias too.
0 -
I'll do a Rangers and take this to court if they ban it!
A chinchilla in a nurse's uniform...hmm.
0 -
Whatever.. scared and away to bed
...to have intercourse with one of your family???
0 -
Im a she.. another paedophile.. around for one night only
You're another paedo??? But just for the one night???
0 -
Good idea.
We want to do it right!
Don't say that. You'll be accused of being a paedo.
0 -
Will be blocked by the morning.. I know.. But hope the pie and bovril footy supporters.. The real footy supporters.. Will remember me tonight.. And whatever team we support..Our little people will be protected from the paedophiles on this site xx
Why would you be blocked?? Did you not see??? You're now our little chinchilla.
0 -
We should keep this one as a pet.
We could get it one of those pet passports.
0 -
Nursed in Carstairs.. Barlinnie.. Nope
You were nursed in Carstairs and Barlinnie?? What were you in for?? Kiddyfiddling??
0 -
No coincidence,, You must be a welfare sponger who has never worked.. And still your suggesting that my daughter who supports Celtic and Hamilton Accies and whose hubby supports Celtic.. But has someone in my house who is the Daddy.. Another Paedophile.. My daughter and son in law had a baby.. like normal non paedophile families.. We all work to keep the paedophile spongers in benefits
I've never sponged a paedo in my life. If you are a nurse, you probably have.
0
Big Rangers Administration/Liquidation Thread - All chat here!
in Celtic v Rangers, Rangers v Celtic
Posted
Surely "full punishment" would be to be made to apply for the vacancy in Div3 along with the likes of Spartans etc. NOT just getting put straight into Div3. If they get in - fair enough, if they don't - more jelly and ice cream. I like jelly and ice cream - yummy.