oot_the_loop
-
Posts
164 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Store
Posts posted by oot_the_loop
-
-
Anyone else think that statement is there to make us all get ourselves worried that it's goodwillie, then someone/something unpopular but nowhere near as bad will get announced and we will all just be glad it's not goodwillie and it will get accepted a wee bit easier?
0 -
2 minutes ago, Bairnardo said:
If Ryan Williamson is close to fit enough for 45, give him them. McGuffie cant create anything from his side on his own.
Also get Ross off for Keena and push Telfer up one. We are going to have to play through or round them as it certainly isnt working over the top, and they arent going to let us stretch it out whilst a goal up.
Most of all though, sharpen the f**k up. Its way, way too ponderousIt C. Williamson on the bench according to the Falkirk twitter.
0 -
Appreciating the subtleties of semantics might come in to play here but did we essentially hire Alan Gow and Gary Holt to perform the same role at the club?
One got himself involved (allegedly) in trying to undermine an investment opportunity for his own selfish gains and the other got involved in tactical on-pitch decisions, before then taking over the role of head coach?
Do we not do job descriptions?
0 -
Im no master tactician or anything but it does seem to me there are obvious flaws with our ill-fated 4-2-3-1 formation, or at least the version of it we are playing.
If we keep playing defensively minded players at left and right back who don’t advance into forward areas, that leaves gaps on the left and right side of midfield. If we also play two deep central midfielders, that compounds that issue and the gap grows more obvious. Gaps on pitches will naturally get filled, so that means the only ones that can fill it are those playing left and right side of the attacking three. However, those two players are meant to be the ones supporting the striker, so lo and behold, the striker looks increasingly isolated and devoid of support.
Likewise, assuming the intention of the left and right of the ‘3’ is therefore that they get the ball deep to drive at the opponents and get crosses into the box. Let’s assume that players is Morrison on the right – we have one striker up top being marked by at least 2, maybe even 3 defenders. The other options at various times are Fotheringham, Telfer, Alston, Gomis, Leitch, Connolly and Francis – a powerhouse of aerial threat they are not.
I don’t like the formation, but for my untrained simple eyes, it only works if we play full backs who can get forward.
Of course, you could just play 4-4-2.
0 -
We brought in Sean Kelly to play left back, so Dixon could move into centre back to lessen the impact of his weaker aspects and the combo of Hall/Durnan got spilt up to lessen the impact if both's weaker aspects.
We had Deveney on loan as cover for Kelly.
Kelly gets injured, so Dixon goes back to left back and its Durnan and Hall in the middle.
Mercer gets injured, so we bring in Neilson on loan as cover for right back - we play Gary Miller at right back.
Connelly gets injured, so we bring in Fotheringham on loan as cover for left wing - we play Robbie Leith at left wing.
WHATS THE F*CKING POINT IN LOAN SIGNINGS?!
Durnan is now suspended and we have McLelland on loan as cover - whats the betting we see Mercer back in at RB, with Gary Miller at CB.
McCrackens latest interview - like Millers before that - is delusional with regards our performances recently and devoid of any responsibility. Its embarrassing.
14 -
See when one striker gets out wide and plays a ball into the box, it's handy having ANOTHER striker there.
1 -
On 17/03/2021 at 21:26, MS RR said:
Every big game Falkirk have had in the last 3 seasons we've lost, so I'm not at all confident. It shows how dreadful M&M really are when you expect to lose a game at home to Montrose.
If we are counting at home to Montrose as a 'big game', then in fairness at home to Cove was also 'big game' , which we won. Being pedantic, we also didn't lose in either of the games against Partick, so I reckon we are on at least a 3 'big game' not losing streak.
Break out the streamers, its celebration time.
I just hope that the months off have allowed the team to practice defending deep crosses to the back post.
0 -
If you consider playing at home to be advantageous, then that is one clear way that an 18 game season is far more fair than a 28 game season or whatever we reached last time.
0 -
12 minutes ago, CC52 FFC said:
There is no chance there could be a null in void season. What would happen to prize money? That was the reason we couldn’t null in void last season. The uproar would be huge.
Only Leagues 1 and 2 will be null and void. The uproar will be minimal and ignored cos frankly, no-one gives a shit about L1 and L2 except those in L1 and L2.
2 -
If we don't have anyone to play wide left mid, pick a formation that doesnt require one. Given the same turgid pish we've seen last few weeks and the somewhat 'free hit' nature of a cup tie against higher league opposition, surely now is the time to try something at least a wee bit different? For what its worth, I reckon we have the players to try a 4-3-3, and I'd honestly like to see what Durnan can do in next to Dixon.
Mutch
Miller Durnan Dixon Kelly
Alston Gomis Telfer
Morrison Keena Francis
0 -
2 hours ago, Bairn in Exile said:
I had an early night and have just woken up to the news that Partick Thistle have been unable to find the resolve to follow through on their threat of legal action against the SPFL. I am disappointed. It is what it is.
While I appreciate that every club voted in their best interests it doesn't hide that fact that their vote of 'yes' has negatively impacted on the club that I love and have supported for some 50 years.My auld man had a saying when it came to politics but I think that it also so applies to our current situation - "if you're no' fur us then you're agin us".
Why should our fans continue to line the coffers of clubs who actively voted to hurt us? Why should we take 1,500 fans up to Clyde twice a season, basically putting GBP50 - 60k into their bank account to sign players and to help them beat us 3 times this season like their fans love to boast about? The same goes for Airdrie, Peterhead, Montrose, Dumbarton and Forfar. Especially Forfar.
I would ask every Falkirk fan to think long and hard before they visit any of these clubs next season if, and I think that league reconstruction will fail, we are in the same league as them next season. Keep you money for the Bairns.
Now, I know the fun that an "away day" has to offer, I have been on many of them over the years. Obviously we will still be able to support the team on our travels to Firhill and New Bayview next season. However, if you really crave more of an away day "fix", and provided it doesn't clash with a home Falkirk FC fixture, why not go along and support, Hearts, Stranraer or Edinburgh City? Brothers in Arms and all that.
Actions have consequences, hopefully, and I hope that sufficient of you view this as I do and will stop travelling to certain away games.
COYB.
No-one voted to actively hurt Falkirk. Each club were given a binary choice of two, almost equally shite options and choose the one that best suited them. How can you blame them for that?
Your anger should not be with the SPFL members clubs, but more with the SPFL board who rushed into presenting this ludicrous vote with two seemingly inevitable choices without even a second glance towards anything that would actually benefit the whole of Scottish Football.
I bear no ill will towards any other club in Scotland over this (well maybe a little for Dundee) - I'm slightly embarrassed for the likes of Ayr, Dundee, Montrose, Airdrie, Elgin and Cowdenbeath who have voluntarily given up their right to a promotion playoff with - it would appear - f*ck all recompense showing a true lack of belief in their own club, but thats as far as it goes.
Dont waste your hate and anger on those that barely deserve it, and dont let the SPFL deflect you away from their own severe incompetence and lack of integrity.
As for hinting towards Hearts or (shudder) the rangers as brothers in arms - oaft.
11 -
We have been shafted though, along with Airdrie and montrose. Not by raith being declared winners, the decision is that current league standings have been taken as final, we just have to swallow that one. Arbitrarily being denied the opportunity of promotion through the playoffs however is a proper shafting for all teams in playoff positions.I actually disagree with most of this [emoji23]
1. We weren't shafted
2. I wont be congratulating raith rovers as the whole season has not been completed, and I was confident we would have caught them, but a decision had to be made at some point which results in a team being promoted, with that team being raith.
3. Hearts, partick and stranraer dont deserve to be relegated, especially partick who had a game in hand. Yes they were bottom of the league, but there were still plenty of points to play for, and it's not their fault the season has come to an abrupt end. I've no issue with the leagues being altered to prevent relegation, even for one season.
You can't declare final positions (and the associated rewards/punishments) for teams top and bottom and not do the same for all other clubs. That would be a completely different rule for two teams to the other 8. That's absolutely a shafting.
If only there was some kind of precedent for cancelling playoffs partway through a season...0 -
Shambles top to bottom but if this does go through, it's an absolute shit show for teams to be relegated without an end to the season but putting that monumental element to one side, these sides do currently occupy spots that would see them relegated, likewise raith currently occupy a slot that would see them promoted.
However, Falkirk, Airdrie and montrose (and qots) currently occupy spots that would result in a promotion playoff...surely the result isn't just to pretend that isn't happening and move on without some form of consideration to that fact?1 -
I get the thread is drenched in sarcasm but I've seen the sentiment in enough places - and from a swathe of fellow bairns - for it to be at least partially held as accurate by some.
I just wanted to point out that clubs were given a straight binary choice between two equally shite outcomes and resolved it by choosing the one that best suited their own needs. Any hate and anger towards individual clubs is horrendously misplaced, and is anger that should be pointed squarely at the absolute f*cknuts supposedly running our game who have attempted to rush into an outcome without giving any due consideration to anything else that might, just might benefit the WHOLE of scottish football.
10 -
I reckon Falkirk is an easy choice as we only have two players really worth a mention, so POTY: McManus, YPOTY: Mutch.
2 -
Did our funds increase by 160k by just releasing the funds set aside for tidsers wages?
1 -
"Two and a half minutes played, and it was coming" is a great quote.
3 -
Cant remember the last time we scored a late goal to win a game 3-2.....!
Chuffed with that result, there was so much resigned inevitability about it going back to 2-2, as per Starks earlier in the season, I cant imagine McKinnons team woulda got the 3 points today.
0 -
That Hibs interim manager done awright today - we should be looking at him.
0 -
2 minutes ago, bairn88 said:
What the f**k is this
I believe the poster is drawing similarities between our own situation and that concerning the now defunct team called Rangers. You know that club that repeatedly gave control to fantasist charlatans and in the end couldn't pay £42 to a local face painting company. The fact that we have done the exact opposite is an interesting way to draw conclusive similarities.
As for the current situation, under what possible criteria could the current MSG have had to come to the conclusion that Mark Campbell was the preferred bidder over 2 other bids that would appear to be far more valid and a string of others that they p*ssed off to the extent their bid was withdrawn. Whilst I'm glad the correct decision has now been reached, the embarrassment factor that is added to the current MSG, in addition to that which already existed due to communication/academy/Lewis/club crest etc issues is such that their future as having any responsibility to run our football club is surely now completely untenable?
1 -
No one played badly, didn't need to be anything other than half decent to win, though I'm liking big mcmillan more and more each game. Very good at creating chances for others and has that knack of flicking out a toe just in front of the defenders for goal attempts.
1 -
Im going for peak Ray and say that neither McManus or Sammon will play on Saturday. Tidser back in alongside Gomis with Mcmillan up top himself.
0 -
Or that they deliberately opted for the most shoddy, shaky bid so that they could have a lengthy and thorough DD process showing that they truly do have the good of the club at heart, before announcing that they discovered some things in the bid that made them concerned and that for the good of the club, its better off if they stay in charge for another wee while for the good of the club, and in the process be the saviours of FFC like they absolutely have been all these years. (for the good of the club).
Or maybe I'm being overly cynical.
0 -
I cant be ersed to check the dates, so was it Rakish Bingham or Botti Biabi that kept him out of the accies team?
0
The Falkirk FC Thread
in Scottish League 1 General Chatter
Posted
From those highlights, that looks like an Oliver hat trick to me. Mcguffies shot saved, then bounces off his back and goes in?