Scott McGill repeatedly crediting Murray for how good he's been with him. Not that McGill is critical to success, but there's a young 'un who will have good reason to be as pissed off as us.
Is there potentially conflict with the technical "support" and "advice" Murray would be getting from Potter etc in the new structure? Overlap? Overshadowing?
Barrowman has said more than once that the board believes Murray is the right man for the job. They've made a clear statement by backing his signings so far and securing Connolly for 2/3 years, so why let him walk away from a contract to the 1st club that flashes its knickers?