Jump to content

aofjays

Gold Members
  • Posts

    1,409
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by aofjays

  1. On 19/11/2018 at 07:27, Ranaldo Bairn said:

    TWFF here. Whether or not I misused the word coterminous is neither here nor there.
    In 1899 RFC were incorporated and thus became indistinguishable from their corporate identity.
    That club is now in liquidation.

    The new club TRFC is owned and operated by Rangers International Football Club.

    These are facts.

    Kinc is flailing around embarrassing himself like a fish out of water, Mundell-like. Answer Monkey's question.

    Kinky has been expertly avoiding that question since a couple of months after rangers died. Good luck mate.

  2. 12 hours ago, The_Kincardine said:

    ^^^ representative of diddies I would say.

    Utterly useless Sevco-obsessed human beings...

    Thank f**k I am not inflicted.afflicted.

    I'm curious Kinky, do you honestly think the person simply answering a question is "obsessed" compared with some idiot that pops up to say "Diddies!!!" whenever a ghost of a chance presents itself? 

  3. On 01/03/2017 at 17:34, Monkey Tennis said:

    But that only works if the thing being discussed is a matter of opinion.  This is a matter of verifiable fact.  I'm very happy to agree to differ when appropriate.  However, if you have a go at me for saying things I didn't, I'll say so.  

    Obviously none of this really matters and you can characterise it as heads gone, a meltdown or whatever pleases you, but as it happens, it does piss me off a bit.  I don't accuse you of coming out with stuff you don't and if I make a mistake about something, I'll admit it.  

    It just bugs me that you operate differently; perhaps it shouldn't.

     

    Yeah, if you are going to get annoyed by rangers fans acting like children you're gonna have a bad time. As Dindeleux touched on watching you appeal to a rangers fans non-existent sense if decency for the 76th time is getting tiresome.

  4. On 26/02/2017 at 12:11, Forever_blueco said:

    Can understand @dave.j rage , I mean my post seems to have taken the thread way off topic from the no doubt relevant discussion about the origins of the word "tarrier"  on a thread which in his eyes should only be about rangers financial fuckwittery . I am sure that was next on his target of discussions which should probably be on another thread aswell . 

    Projection is like breathing for you isn't it?

  5. 11 minutes ago, Romeo said:

    Apparently they don't care :lol:

    I like this one:

    "The funniest thing about it is they've not beat us at Ibrox in almost 30 years. They will probably do it this season to be honest so will they be celebrating like f**k (and I wouldn't blame them - first time win at a venue in 30 years regardless of how shite we are is still a big feat) or will they just be applauded off the pitch? beating a new team with no history and everything ...

    I wonder"

     

    Because obviously it being exactly the same group of knuckle draggers following the new club has nothing to do with how people react to them.

  6. 9 hours ago, stonedsailor said:

    Like I said, it is not up to the SFA. It would be at the discretion of the HFL to credit us with those titles as the HFL awarded them in the first place. Besides, those titles were transferred to The Inverness Thistle and Caledonian Football Club Ltd when the assets of Caledonian and Inverness Thistle were merged into a new company.

    We are 2 clubs fielding one team through a single company.......I think.

    Sorry, wisnae paying attention, still, I think you need a letter from ASA to prove that one Stoney. 

  7. 3 minutes ago, stonedsailor said:

    Fair enough. They are a new club. I would disagree that the titles are the purview of the SFA, Scottish Cups yes but league titles, no. League titles are awarded by the league. If they are allowed to transfer past honours to the new club then surely any club can have honours of a dead club transfered to their roll? ICT should have all the old Caley and Thistle HFL titles added to our roll of honour as well as all of our north and qualifying cup wins.

    While the SFA could do that unless you can get some idiots to spout rubbish about social unrest I reckon you are going to be disappointed. Maybe you could give one of the heads of the SFA a bunch of money in a brown envelope? That seems to work.

  8. 3 hours ago, stonedsailor said:

    It is possible, unlikely but possible, that UEFA recognise the sporting continuation. The ASA have already said they have correspondence from UEFA stating the possibility.  I think the Italian FA have rules in place saying that so long as all debts are paid and a club springs up in the same city that a new entity can have they sporting history transferred to it.

    I am just not wanting to jump the gun on this one, regardless of how clear cut it seems.

    As far as I know titles are the purview of the SFA, so while the earlier part of the letter could possibly say they can keep there ill gotten gains (why they want to is anyone's guess). I disagree that that would negate the summation.

  9. 1 minute ago, stonedsailor said:

    It's easy to argue with. Half the letter is censored.

    I would be delighted if this was the final proof in the new club debate but the fact that half the letter is hidden, coupled with the length of time taken to publish it makes me think that the hidden portion shows tha UEFA recognise continuation.

     

    That's not arguing. That's nudging and winking while saying things like, "there's a lot goes on we don't get told". It's pretty much the opposite of an argument.

    The letter states the old club went into administration and a new club/company (which is the same thing according to UEFA's rules) was ineligible to apply for a license.

     

    What on earth do you believe could be in the censored part that somehow twists the summing up to mean it's the same club?

×
×
  • Create New...