Jump to content

Lebowski

Gold Members
  • Posts

    920
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Lebowski

  1. I’d like us to get Docherty loan or permanent. Then someone to challenge Stevenson. We could get by with that I think, as long as we don’t lose Boyle. 

    I thought Docherty was pretty good for us, but there's some serious limitations with him in my opinion. First, he'll be on higher wages than anyone currently at ER, and I'm unconvinced he's good enough to justify that here. Second, he's really not a great passer of the ball. He's not a great tackler either. He was also invisible in the Derby and at Pittodrie in two big games for the club which concerns me. More positively he does run about like f**k, he reads a game okay, plus it's nice to have a midfielder getting into the box. I just don't think he's enough of an upgrade on either Mallan or Hallberg to justify the money he'd likely be looking for.
  2. 65 years would take us back to 1955. Hearts went on a bit of a trophy run in the next 5 years, 2 league titles, 1 Scottish Cup and 2 league cups.
    If you go back 60 years, their trophy haul is 4.
    Let's stick with 60.
    Fucking typo, was meant to be 55 to specifically exclude their terrible trio side but include Killie skelping them last day of the season to beat them to the league [emoji1]
  3. Findlay and Cameron did say they favoured reconstruction but this is the wrong time so perhaps there is a majority of clubs in favour of reconstruction.
    You don't need a majority, you need 80% from every tier of the league.

    It's deliberately difficult to get through because they fucked about with the structure so much previously.
  4. Aberdeen and Hearts both would have won the league with a point in their last game. And yes, technically it did go to the last 7 minutes for Aberdeen. If they'd scored twice they'd have won the league.

    Did it go down to the last 7 minutes? Think we have a different definition of the wire. Aberdeen lost by 2 points. Hearts lost by a couple of goals.

    Point still stands - we are the last team to push the OF that close. 

     

  5. Nope, it should have been left after the clubs voted against any changes, the timing was never right and in the middle of the whole Covid situation the decision to take it further was a poor one in my view. Hearts are not going to change the system or bring down the SFA, they simply don’t have the support of anyone else. I don’t believe there is a cat in hells chance they will be playing in the Premiership next season and any comp will be a fraction of what they want. I just don’t see what they are going to gain from this other than driving a wedge between the club and others.
    Blaming others for their own failures? Hearts? As if that would happen.
  6. Hibs too. Less than a decade after selling those players they had to spend multiple years in the second tier.
    That's fair. I think being comfortable selling players you need to also be comfortable that your recruitment is good too.

    I think Aberdeen have been miles better at this recently than most, so if I was an Aberdeen supporter I'd be less fussed about selling players because I'd have reasonable confidence they would be replaced adequately. That was not the case at Hibs at all.
  7. Yeah that generation that Hibs brought through must have done wonders for the club's finances but I don't think there are any players at Aberdeen that would have gotten close to some of those fees.
    You can argue that is maybe down to a certain failure in Aberdeens youth scouting and training but there haven't been players demanding those kind of fees that Aberdeen have mismanaged as Aberdeen definitely would have sold them if there were.
    It basically paid off the stadium and built the training ground. It not being reinvested on the playing side was a bit of a disaster tbh.

    I think I've actually missed at least a couple too. De La Cruz went for about 2.5m and David Murphy about 2m.
  8. Outside of the old firm how many players have sold for more than that since? It’s not that common. 
    It's not an annual occurrence or anything, but Hibs have sold O'Connor, Whittaker, Thomson, Brown, Fletcher, and Mcginn for more than that. He's wrong about Hibs highest fee being the 4.4m for Brown fwiw, Fletcher Hibs got more for after sell on fees got added. Mcginn will likely be the same.
  9. Out of interest...do Hibs fans see Gogic as an out and out starter for next season?
    I've always thought he'd be a great player to have in the squad but maybe not a player that I'd want starting in a game that requires Hibs to take the initiative in an attacking sense.
    Yes. Our midfield last season was okay at creating, but it was getting completely overrun defensively on so regular a basis it was unreal.
  10. Hearts were slaughtered for the above. For seeing what was coming. 
    Hibs stuck their head in the sand, made promises they wouldn't keep and basked in the positive PR being the "good guys" would bring.
    Hearts were up front and honest about what was coming, Hibs weren't. I'm sure you can see the difference.
    Hearts didn't have the insurance to cover it. Other clubs did. Yet another example of why this entire horse and pony show has been about distracting Hearts fans about how utterly shite your club is run.
  11. Ach, its their USP - we are used to it and find their behaviour predictable and laughable.
    They call Hibs fans spoonburners and vermin, generally look down on us despite being a comparable size.
    When fans of St J (for example) might say "we have won the last 3 matches against you Hibby pish", Hearts fans will dredge up some period where they won no matches but shitfested draws over a period when the teams were in different divisions and unfurl "4 years unbeaten" flags or some other boring shite.
    Its all to deflect from the fact that they spend staggering sums of money on no end result. Last season? Perhaps 5 times St J budget to end up bottom.
    image.png.56eb355c12cbc33c5fd7857b5d3bf4c7.png
    But 5-1.
  12. I’m bracing myself for losing Boyle tbh. It can’t be all good news. Jack Ross did say we were adding Wright because we only had Horgan and Boyle as wide options so he sounds like an addition rather than a replacement. If Boyle goes we’ll need another wide player. 
    I love the boy, but he's got a year left on his contract and has had two pretty bad knee injuries. He's came back from the injuries without missing a beat, and he's continually got better, but if there's a good offer for him I think we probably have to take it. I think it would take a good offer though.
  13. Then they shouldn't have let it get to court and put member clubs at risk of a compensation payment they can't afford. There were other solutions that didn't have that risk. As I've said before it's incredible the support other fans are giving the SPFL over their handling of this. Hibs I can understand. Mid table, noting to win or lose, having a laugh at us, I'd be doing the same. I wouldn't be backing the SPFL like this though. Never seen anything like it in decades following Scottish football and there's some sort of dispute every year.
    You're a fucking halfwit btw. You honestly think Hibs took their decision to get it up Hearts? Along with 9 other clubs in the league? They took decisions based on the best interest of their clubs. And it was an identical decision making process to the one Hearts would have taken if they weren't the worst side in the league.
  14. The Sun claiming you are set to make up to 70 redundancies.  I assume that's a typical Sun comment and most of them will be part time/casual employees?

    Aye. Seen a boy who was running hospitality saying him and all his team had been made redundant. Others likely will be other matchday staff.

     

    But, I'd not be surprised if they had cut everything else to the bone.

     

    I'd also be surprised if every other club hadn't at least been looking at ditching their matchday staff at the moment.

     

  15. Did the Scottish gov not say schools would reopen part time then changed to a completely different strategy after lobbying? If the SPFL had paused the league instead of calling it so soon MAYBE the gov could have been persuaded to play closed door games starting July. Because the SPFL had already called the league the focus was on a later timeline.
    On what timescale did they change their mind on schools? Was it about what happens in August maybe? Which is when they have allowed football to start. Because transmission of the virus is now mostly under control here.

    This is going to be difficult for you, but can you perhaps imagine how every single other industry (which dwarf football in terms of importance to the economy) would have reacted to special exemptions being introduced for football while their businesses go out the box.

    BTW, football restarting is one thing. There's zero to say that it won't be put back into lockdown again. This is another reason why they want to start the new season rather than try to finish the last one.
  16. Will there be 50k fans at each of the semi finals and final?
    When are they due to be played?
    They cancelled the league and they had broadcasters and sponsors, why would the Scottish cup be given preferential treatment?
    Given they've said they're only going to schedule it when fans are allowed, I'd say yes it will be in front of roughly that amount of people. Unless of course Hearts fans boycott/think they'll lose.

    They ended the league early because there is a substantial increase in TV money for the coming season. Attempting to finish the league meant they would have breached their contract with Sky for that and have to renegotiate it. This after Sky knew that BT had bid 13m less a season than they did. Why exactly do you think the only clubs not wanting to end the league were those who were impacted by relegation/non promotion and Rangers who need to appeal to their nutjob support?


  17. Resuming the Scottish cup is to get Celtic a treble nothing more , if they had exited they were be no talk of the Scottish cup resuming
    That is utter nonsense. The SFA want the cup to go ahead because they can't afford the hit of not having around 140-150k fans buying tickets for the three remaining games. The clubs remaining in it will all be in line for around half a million each just from the gate receipts from the semi finals. Cancelling it means refunding the sponsor and broadcasters.
  18.  

    What option did she have? Even Neil Doncaster said he thought there was support. Quite a number of clubs are quoted as saying they were surprised how little support there was in the end. Anonymous sources were quoted in the Record saying some chairmen had decided they wouldn't vote for anything that benefitted Caley. It seems to have been a total charade.

    To say that reconstruction in the form she suggested would not pass. Which she was told early and knew.

     

    There was some support for reconstruction. There was never anything remotely approaching enough to have what Budge proposed passed.

     

    It was a complete waste of time and energy. And to me it looks like it was only done to wind up Hearts fans when it was rejected. How many new FOH subs and season tickets have been sold on the back of other sides rejecting Hearts reconstruction plan?

     

    The reason why reconstruction is difficult is because you have to produce something better than what you have for the majority of teams. The Budge proposal was better for 6-8 teams and definitively worse for another 36 sides.

     

×
×
  • Create New...