Jump to content

BossHogg

Banned
  • Posts

    849
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by BossHogg

  1. Even with that considered to you actually think they would be able to go back for dinner and act like nothing had happened - how would they know where to hide the body? They were accused of having her in the boot 25 days after she went missing so how could they go hide here somewhere for that long so that they would know where the body was when they were to go back? I think people need to ask themselves if it happened to them in that situation would they be able to carry on like nothing had happened just to cover their tracks?!

    You've no met my weans.

  2. I don't buy into it at all , i know dogs don't lie but the two parents would need to have discovered her body, been able to establish she was dead without any reasonable doubt and agree to hide the body whilst remaining cool and calm and going out for dinner and drinks amidst it all.

    if you read the reports of the last hours , their was a 2.5 hr gap between Maddie being seen and the parents going to the bar, and the version of events from the McCanns differs from the rest of the party and the bar staff...

  3. What 'drove' them !?

    They very stupid decision, one they will no doubt regret for the rest of their lives - I'm sure Kate recently said in an interview (Watchdog !?) that she keeps asking herself why she thought it was ok to leave them.

    on the point of "leaving their children" I think abuse over this is ridiculous, Although at the time I originally agreed , but after I seen a layout of the resort and how close they were to their apartment I changed my mind , Ive seen hundreds of people do similar on holiday,

    I dont know if theres a pic of the layout of the resort but basically its , their apartment block, a swimming poll and the restaurant they were in, they were literally a stones throw away.

    They narrative that they left their kids and "went out" is just false.

  4. Israeli arrests of Palestinian children have increased by 80 per cent over the past two months compared with the average monthly number detained by the occupation authorities over the past two years.

    The Euro-Mid Observer for Human Rights said in a report released on Monday that Israeli forces arrested 740 Palestinian children in January and February. Of these, 465 were detained for at least one week.

    The Geneva-based watchdog said the average number of Palestinian children detained in 2013 was 200 per month, according to statistics released by the Israeli Prisons Service. The figure for 2012 was 197 arrests of children per month.

    The report pointed out that most of the children were arrested for throwing stones at the Israeli soldiers who roam Palestinian cities. In other cases, they were taking part in peaceful protests against Israel's apartheid wall, or creating graffiti in protest at the Israeli occupation.

    The international organisation said that the Israelis carried out most of the arrests at night. The tactics, it alleges, are "repressive" and intended to "intimidate" the child and his family for no real security or other justification. The arresting officers usually refuse to allow the child's guardian to accompany him during the arrest, or tell his a parents where he is being taken.

    Several children allege that they were subjected to great stress during interrogation by the Israelis, including verbal abuse and sleep deprivation; they were also, they claim, prevented from going to the toilet, and were beaten. All are procedures amounting to torture and causing damage, abuse and violence to the child as defined by article 19/1 of the Convention on the Rights of the Child, which also stipulates that not only should such practices end but also the perpetrators should be prosecuted.

  5. Yes - you're snookered Tedi - the spivs have won - they can limp to SPFL then start rodgering you Orcs rudely from behind without vaceline (SP?) once the loyal start gawping at STs in the big big league and buy buy buy

    No!,but wait, maybe they'll ,send another message to the board?..or form another fans group,,,or wait on King,,,,or the blue knights,,,or March on Hampden, or another card display, or deliver postcards, or bring out another scarf.......they've all worked fantastically well in the past.

  6. We are all individuals stoney with individual choices, fans of both clubs have the choice to move on, many have and I applaud them many, still hold onto notions of orange and tricolour tops and use excuses like heritage for doing so. My point is that this 'heritage' no longer means anything in today's society, especially with regards to football, it is outdated and there simply is no excuse for holding onto it.

    Painting us all with the same brush is neither reasonable or in anyway truthful.

    From the club that's just brought out a Union Jack top.

  7. dont cry norman ? didnt your club... sorry i mean celtic bring out a tri-colour top a few years back. before i get accused of whataboutery, just want your opinion on wether it was acceptable or not.

    p.s the orange top was a belter ;)

    What...Celtic a club from Irish heritage with green white n gold on their strip? Just like theyve had for over 40 years?...yeah thats the same as Rangers with an orange top?!

×
×
  • Create New...