Jump to content

danord

Gold Members
  • Posts

    17
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by danord

  1. Well it appears that there wasn't booing of individual players.
    That directed at a performance at the end of a half probably isn't designed to do much good.  Instead, it's a legitimate expression of dissatisfaction with what's been served up to those paying for the privilege of watching.  There should really be something reciprocal about the relationship between team and supporters after all.
    Anyway, the discussion is still kind of redundant with reference to yesterday, because there was next to no real evidence of the phenomenon anyway.


    Why do it if it’s not going to do any good?
  2. And possibly no such thing happened at all.
    So the booing was confined to the ends of two execrable halves of football.  Sorry, but that doesn't actually sound too confined to our monstrous fans.  I'm sure I've even heard other fans do it before.   Booing at such times would suggest an overall dissatisfaction with how the team was doing, rather than a singling out of anyone.  Indeed, if anyone was the target of that type of stuff, it would be reasonable to assume it was the manager.  It seems that Naysmith's wishes have perhaps been granted.
    As pointed out the perfect opportunity to victimise young Murray was presented when he was taken off.  Thankfully, there was none of the ironic cheering that sometimes greets such situations.  
    I don't honestly feel that anyone was badly treated by supporters yesterday.


    I don’t think fans should be booing their players at all. If they are playing badly we should try and encourage them instead of getting on their backs. Fair enough if you have a moan a couple of times throughout a game but I don’t think booing does much good.
  3. See this booing.
    Did anyone who was actually present at the match notice it?
    I didn't.  Not even a wee bit.  There was grumbling, some of which I was responsible for myself, but no booing that I  was aware of. 
    Even the grumbling was bloody mild, especially in the context of what we were being treated to.  
     
    It's ironic that a boo boy debate has started, even though there was precious little evidence of an issue, beyond one apparently raised by a manager deflecting away from his own failings.


    Clear booing at both half time and full time. Possibly individual players were booed when they went into tunnel



  4. You really don't seem to be grasping this. No one has had a pop at him for defending Murray. I've said I think it's not the way he portrays it but that aside I've not said much else. My issue with the interview is he never focussed on how god awful we were but instead chose to focus on two players getting a bit of stick.


    So is danord an alias of yours or just a pal who's signed up to back you? [emoji38]


    I am my own person. Not a clue who qos_1919 is
  5. Is there anyone on this forum heading down to the AGM tomorrow night ?

    Also wondered do you think Naysmith and the BOD’s will get a hard time or doesn’t that sort of thing happen at these meetings ?


    Hope BOD get questioned on blocking fan representation on the board. Probably won’t give proper answer but seems like there are things that they don’t want fans to know about
  6. Naysmith needs to look at himself before questioning fans.


    Queens fans like to point out everything that is wrong with the team and don’t praise them when they play well. I remember when we were 3-0 up to Falkirk at home earlier in the season and still heard a lot of negativity from so called fans. I think a lot of queens fans need to question themselves before the players or management
×
×
  • Create New...