[The SPFL vote vote]

2 minutes ago, Green Day said:

Do you think its likely that the organisation that wrote the regulations is getting this wrong, based on their letter to clubs today?

Do you think there is a small (massive !) chance that Rangers have made a complete cock up of this and are just digging deeper and deeper with every statement?

Maybe I am wrong, but I doubt it.

I think there is a very big chance the organisation is getting it wrong.

[The SPFL vote vote]

2 minutes ago, Zing. said:

I briefly tried to catch up on all of this earlier and saw someone saying that any no votes can be changed to a yes within the 28 days but they can’t be changed the other way, which seems ridiculous.

f**k knows what Dundee have been up to. I’m sure whenever they get round to releasing a statement on what went on it’ll be a belter. 

I think that is ridiculous. If a club can change one way they can surely change the other way.

[The SPFL vote vote]

1 minute ago, Green Day said:

Dundee are all over the place. Seems like the Chairman contacted SPFL before the "vote" arrived to say "ignore the vote, we are still in discussion".

Dundee have fucked this and until their owner/chairman confirms their vote the one shown to the ICT fanny doesn't count.

Yes indeed Dundee are all over the place but so are very much the SPFL. I still think a case can be made  that b they have legally cast their vote.

[The SPFL vote vote]

7 minutes ago, LordHawHaw said:

I would have thought you could change it up to when you cannot,ie  when the deadline is reached

Is it not the case that Dundee's vote has been legally cast , and therefore the proposition falls.