Jump to content

waysider

Gold Members
  • Posts

    1,418
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by waysider

  1. 9 hours ago, Diamond1924 said:

    Looking forward to todays game. Still feeling a little flat from the result + events of last weeks game + court case so will be choosing to watch EFTV or GTFTV as it should be named. 

    Haven’t heard much about east fife in recent weeks but I assume that they’ll be up for this today if they want to stay up. 
     

    I’d like to see Allan start instead of Gal today. I think that match against cove was beyond his strengths. We needed someone who would chase down the ball from their back 3. 

    Apart from that, the team is still looking strong and we’re still in it just now. 
     

    Safe journey for those who are heading up ♦️
     

     

     

  2. Well, that was exciting. We won because Clyde were worse than us. Their defending in the first half was the worst I’ve seen for a while. Clearly the wind and rain spoiled the match. I thought the conditions got worse as the game went on. At the end it was like two teams of schoolboys miskicking and misheading the ball. The Clyde player on the left even made a mess of throw Ins several times! One criticism of our performance was when playing against a strong wind why do our players keep kicking the ball straight up in the air?

    Despite all the above moaning I am happy for the win which brings us back into the mix. Great goal from Kerr.

  3. In so far as yesterday’s match is concerned taken on it's own I disagree with most posters. We dominated possession and had more shots on target than in any other game so far. The ball did not bounce favourably for us in their penalty area and we were hit by 2 breakaway goals (albeit defensive mistakes). On another day we would  have won.

    However, on a broader front we have major issues. Firstly, who picks the players we sign.? If it is Murray he obviously doesn’t have an eye for a player. If it someone else, Murray will obviously not fancy some of them. 
    Murray has 2 major problems. His grasp of tactics is fairly grim. An example from yesterday was substituting a forward who was playing well when we were 2 down.His second major problem is team selection. He seems to put the names in a hat and pull 11 out every week. I’ve lost count of the number of times I think we’ve a better team on the bench than on the park! It’s disgrace and he’s been like that since he came. 

    However, there’s a problem in getting rid of him. It would cost the club money which they probably don’t have.

    I’ve been an Airdrie fan all my life and am getting fed up with all these false dawns. I suspect others may be too. 

  4. 50 minutes ago, ShineOnYouCrazyDiamonds said:


    The extra subs is a temporary measure due to players returning after a long time not playing. Teams can make 5 subs in three separate stoppages (so two double changes and a single, or a triple sub and two singles). This is the case in the Premiership, League One and League Two, but not in the Championship as not enough clubs in that league voted in favour. Both games we've named 7 subs but I'm sure we're allowed to name 9 with this new rule, as that is how it has been in the Premiership. The playoffs at the end of the season will return to three subs allowed but a fourth is allowed to be made if the game goes to extra time.

    I'm sure the new goal kick rule came in at the start of last season. Keeper is now allowed to play it to his defenders inside the box but opposition players still cannot be in the box when the kick is taken (exception to this is if the keeper takes a quick goal kick and it's deemed that the attacker did not have enough time to leave the box)

    As for the third question I haven't got a clue

    Quote

    Thanks. I thought the subs question must have been something about the virus.

     

  5. Change of topic. I seem to be totally ignorant as to apparent changes to the rules. This season I have noticed (1) Twice in Airdrie games I have noticed the keeper taking a goal kick and passing it to a defender who was clearly in the box when he first touched it. (2) Peterhead were allowed to bring on 4 subs ,all for injuries, against us. I thought the maximum for the league games was 3. (3)  In a European match several times the goalie stood with the ball in his hands about to kick it out. An attacker stood very close to him and lifted his leg to attempt to block the kick. I didn’t think this was allowed.

    Can anyone help me out. I remember getting caught out a few years ago when kicking a ball backwards at a kick off was allowed.

  6. We were rank rotten. Rovers looked the more likely team at the end. A lot of people say it’s only a friendly but the obvious problems show themselves anyway. Our strongest defence will do ok. However, further up the field we continue to have problems. We have no decent midfield (apart from the classy Sabatini) and we will struggle to score goals. Robert continues to disappoint me. I thought the trialist centre was the same guy as last game but even if it was two different people (they or he) are, or is, pretty useless. I know Roy has started the season scoring well but based on last season I’ll be surprised if that continues.

    No way will we be challenging for promotion.

    The Rev I M Jolly.

  7. 3 minutes ago, Diamond10 said:

     


    As far as the goals we conceded I think if we had Crighton and Fordyce at the back we would’ve been able to prevent them .

    Trying not to be pessimistic but As I said last week If someone offered me 4th place right now I’d take it and run. I think the defence will take care of itself. As much as the core of the team is the same we had five new players in the starting 11. Just need to give everyone time to gel , get match sharp and let Murray find out about what the best system and 11 is. Especially the Sabatini and Robert who haven’t played in Scotland before.

    We’ve got 2 preseason games left followed by 2 betfred cup games which in my opinion should be treated as friendlies. So we have over 3 weeks training before the real stuff starts.

     

    Fair enough but it was early season too for Rovers and they also can be expected to improve on last night as well.

  8. Having now had a chance to work out who was who, I had concerns over last night’s performance. If we play like that in the league there is no chance of being anywhere near promotion. Failure to dominate a team are as low as Albion Rovers in midfield does not bode well. I thought Robert was poor and certainly not the wonder kid we were told we had signed. On the positive side having now seen the three goals up close they were cracking goals.

    On the positive side having now seen the three goals up close they were cracking goals.

     

    I know it is early season but I am not confident.

  9. 11 minutes ago, airdrieman said:

    I believe the camera uses AI/motion sensors (insert joke about intelligence in Airdrie here) rather than being person-operated. Wasn't ideal and I believe Thistle had the same problems over the weekend. Hopefully any issues will be sorted before the real stuff starts. 

     

    11 minutes ago, airdrieman said:

    I believe the camera uses AI/motion sensors (insert joke about intelligence in Airdrie here) rather than being person-operated. Wasn't ideal and I believe Thistle had the same problems over the weekend. Hopefully any issues will be sorted before the real stuff starts. 

    First half was dreadful. Defence made two horrendous mistakes prior to first goal, in so far as I saw it. In first half you would think our players were playing rugby. I lost count as to the number of shots which went sailing by miles over the bar.

    Second half was better. Did our class begin to  tell (joke) or did Rovers fade.? Scored a couple of nice goals. Like some others I couldn't tell who was who but the centre back in the first half was too slow. Both the Right wingers we used played a similar game. Fast and energetic but poor end product.

    Have to add To what others have said about the cameraman.3 times he was concentrating on the goalie standing alone in his own half while the action was taking place in the other penalty box. 

  10. 1 hour ago, G_H said:

    It's hard to moan too much when they haven't had a game for what 7-8 months?

    Few decisions I would have liked the players to act differently on or sooner, but nothing dramatic.

    Nobody failed, and it was good to see some composure in situations we didn't have it last year, and a bit of fluidity in the 2nd half. Could have created a bit more in the first half perhaps.

    Ref was pish, Kelty got about 80% of the decisions their way, and he certainly didn't like Sabatini for some reason, must have been the softest penalty I've seen given this side of the millennium. 

    I hope "infinity 21 streaming" are going to mail me some paracetamol after their choppy-vision broadcast.

     

     

    I regarded it is a fiver down the drain. Everything froze every 10 seconds and you had to switch it off and on again. I got fed up and left it eventually. Tried is again a few times during the match but still the same.

  11. 3 hours ago, cb_diamond said:

    I'm rarely bothered that much about wins and losses in pre season with performances being more important IMO, however, I hope we absolutely turn over Kelly Hearts for the simple reason that it will make Barry Ferguson miserable on a Saturday night and that would be pleasing.

    I’ve just finished watching highlights of Kelty v Tynecastle on YouTube. Wish I hadn’t. Kelty won 6-1 (including 3 stonewall penalties). Hope we can defend better than Tynecastle.

  12. 1 hour ago, Ralstonite said:

    How are the Diamonds going to cope financially without paying spectators? Will the club be televising games?

    I hate to be a misery, but I think there will be a new lockdown soon, and I doubt things will return to normal until at least March.

    That is a good question. I emailed the club about it sometime ago and did not get a reply. I sent a reminder and still no reply. I appreciate that there may be some complications to work through but I would have appreciated an acknowledgement but I am not surprised given the club’s track record on communication.

  13. I accept we have experienced players in goal and central defence. Neither full back is experienced although McCann in particular was good last year. We have 2 experienced forwards and that is it in terms of experience. Remember too that players get injured. The midfield was terrible last year but on signings so far I bet that nobody has heard of many of them before. The fact that you are foreign doesn’t necessarily make you a good player. So on the basis of this I would say that we are likely to have a team the majority of whom have everything to prove. I accept that the signings aren’t finished but from comment from people ITK future signings look like being youngsters as well.

    I’ve probably become a cynic but I’ve been disappointed so often I’m not getting over excited. As I said before, I hope I’m wrong.

  14. I’m well aware that other signings may improve things but I’m worried about the direction we are going in. Apart from Currie, none of the signings have yet broken through. I doubt if many fans have heard of any of them. Hopefully, some of them will fulfil their stated potential but some of them won’t. It is very dangerous putting out a team full of youngsters with minimum experience in this brutal league. We don’t have enough experience particularly in midfield. I fear this season may lead to further disappointment for the long suffering Airdrie fans.

    As I said above, I know more players can still come in but unless we achieve a better balance it looks like a long hard season. I hope I’m wrong.

×
×
  • Create New...