Jump to content

nofixedability

Gold Members
  • Posts

    2,155
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by nofixedability

  1. 2 hours ago, Life on Marrs? said:

    Bonnyrigg would need to have an average crowd 40% higher than ours to be bringing in the same amount at the gate. 

    I'm not in favour of our prices either, but if we're paying that much, we should have a better playing budget than others. 

    A few decent signings would encourage ticket sales & a winning team puts bums on seats. 

    No info to back this up but I would imagine Forfar’s budget won’t be that far from yours, my season ticket is £190. 

  2. 5 minutes ago, MattyAitkenSuperFan said:

    Safe to stay that recruitment may not be one of Irvines strong points. Unless you need too many midfielders. 

    The joke there is that Hutton was his January signing then he ends the season benched in favour of Jobber Harkins. Also paid the price today for our utter lack of striking options.

  3. Just now, Jupiter Jazz said:

    Got what we deserved, what a mess Irvine has made of things. His mate getting 90 minutes and the likes of Thomson not even getting on the pitch is a total wind up. What an infuraiting manager he is.

    Yeah, Harkins in particular but others were obviously knackered with 10-15 minutes to play yet no subs despite the options on the bench to freshen things.

    When dust settles I suspect it will be a good thing this lot are not in League One next season.

  4. 2 minutes ago, Neilly said:

    Forfar deserve to stay down for accommodating Harkins.

    Genuinely Irvine should be punted if they don't go up as he shoehorns his old pal in the team who should be nowhere near playing league football. 

    While I wholeheartedly agree with both statements, Harkins did play ( and be OK) in our recent 5-1 defeat of Annan so he may point to that as a reason to play him last night.

    Not a great result last night but we are still in the tie, big improvement needed on Saturday. Did think that being home in midweek was a likely advantage given the distances.

  5. 29 minutes ago, the philosopher said:

    At the end of the season the League table never lies and all 4 teams are there on merit ( strange way to describe Dumbarton's predicament mind you).

    The 3 League 2 teams have all been faltering and inconsistent the last 6 weeks or so whereas Dumbarton have had some decent form.

    If Annan are up for it tonight I think they can take a good lead up to Station Park on Saturday and go all the way.

    Have a feeling Dumbarton will be too strong for all three of the League Two sides, as you say all three have been way too inconsistent. Would imagine all are just battling to be favourites for the drop next season too. 
     

    For tonight if we can get a draw would be pretty happy as think we can see off most teams at home.

  6. 1 hour ago, Bridie Vision said:

    Rambling post incoming!

    What do you think are Forfar's objectives for next season?

    If we stay in L2 then it's surely the title, as it should be an easier season as there won't be a moneybags club (Fraserburgh have some backing but nowhere near Cove/Kelty levels. They also have to overcome a suddenly in-form Cowden).

    If we get promoted we're going into a stacked L1 as there will be Queen's Park, Kelty, Falkirk, Queen of the South and probably Dunfermline or Ayr (I reckon the Diamonds will go up).

    Then we have Alloa and Montrose who won't be any slouch. What situation would you all prefer?

    With the trapdoor in place would always be better as far away from it as possible. However, I would seriously fear for us in League One again without major upgrades in most positions. 

  7. 12 hours ago, the philosopher said:

    Spot on Iwh - you guys been in a bit of free fall recently.

    From an Annan point o view hopefully we finish 2nd and get 2nd. Leg of playoff at Galabank

    Irvine is , rightly, talking up wanting to finish second but I wonder if third might be better? 

    Think a weekend trip to Annan might be better for the players and certainly for the fans than a midweek one.

    Either way will be a couple of tight games and with us still to play in the league could  pretty tense affairs. We have had the better in the league matches so far but don't think there is much between the two sides. 

  8. By the time Travis was fit Munro and Anderson were established as the central pairing. Travis clearly wanted to play and wasn’t likely to get past them at the time. With Whyte to return Travis moved on. Don’t see a problem personally Travis may be better than Munro but clearly could not be relied on as much so he stuck with him as right footed centre half. 
     

    A couple of people have told me Thomas had an injury but if so don’t get why he’s on the bench.  
     

    As evidenced by last 20 minutes on Saturday, problem is not the personnel so much ( though clearly our striking options are not good enough and Harkins should have stayed retired) but our attitude/ negative formation / confidence  IMO.

  9. 4 hours ago, Loon From Outta Toon said:

    What has he done which has made us better than under Malcolm?

    both two useless managers that can’t change things when the aren’t going our way.

    our squad is atrocious, Irvine claimed we had the best team in the league?

    he should be checked into a mental asylum 

    Agree with a lot of that but he can change things, did so today and it got us back into the game. But he never learns , the first half’s are like Groundhog Day, same team , same negative set up at home and waiting until we are behind to even have a go.

×
×
  • Create New...