Jump to content

Poo

Gold Members
  • Posts

    184
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Poo

  1. 1 hour ago, The Chlamydia Kid said:

    What are you actually slabbering about????

    "Authoritative sources"

    Like who? The DaIly Mail? The Daily Express? The Sun?...... Basically all of the sources that don't actually back up anything they say, but people like you are idiodic enough to believe anyway.

  2. 15 hours ago, The Chlamydia Kid said:


    Try learning from more authoritative sources than Wikipedia.

    Because the authorities are a real trustworthy bunch who never sweep things under the rug to save their own ass.

  3. 9 hours ago, sparky88 said:

    It's not lying. The daily mail was talking about travel expenses and other selected expenses that went up. WOS shot back with a load of whataboutery (a very common theme for wos articles) about the total expenses spend being down. Both sources selectively used the figures for their own ends.

    WOS is showing the whole thing. The Daily Mail is using selective statistics as you admit yourself. It's morons like you who read papers like the Daily Mail, Express and Telegraph who take a whataboutery attitude, because you know what you're reading isn't giving you the complete picture. Just selective facts while leaving out the rest in order to create a narritive bias.

    But as long as it reads #SNPbad, you don't really care if it isn't accurate when compared to the complete picture.

    You don't even consider the fact that their travelling expenses are higher, because they have far greater involvement over debates and voting at westminster than the previous labconlib arrangement.

  4. 1 hour ago, The Chlamydia Kid said:

    Name me a country that doesn't think their own nationals should be given priority status in employment??

    "It's ok to be racist because other people are" type argument. Pathetic.

  5. 20 minutes ago, jmothecat said:

     


    I'm not convinced that would be the best use of resources. Buckingham palace is a one of a kind, it's historically and culturally significant so using it just to house people (whether Royal or not) seems like a dire waste of a unique opportunity. There are other buildings we can use for the homeless and the royals which would free up Buckingham palace to be used by everyone in our society. A free entry art gallery seems a sensible choice and good use for a state owned building.
     

    Should we be maintaining things that are historically significant when it's things we're better off forgetting? Why hold onto things that only remind us of the shame of the human race?

  6. 4 minutes ago, The Chlamydia Kid said:

    That's a pretty standard policy throughout the worldemoji23.png

    I think your definition of "hatred" and "bigotry" is a bit too broad...

    It's not "standard policy" here and your brexit won't bring it either. Racist.

  7. 4 hours ago, The Chlamydia Kid said:

    Loads of yes voters talk about how positive the referendum process was and how engaged the public in politics.
    Yet when the man above engages and speaks he's dismissed as a "Ned" and his view deemed not worthy of consideration as he's in a flute band. Ridiculous.

    The problem with people like you and the ned in the video is that you see politics as a platform to spout your racist bigotry and hatred. The aim of politics is to open dialog. But your kind contradict that when you think you can use politics as a way of targetting minorities and different cultures and creeds and stripping them of their democratic rights.

    We shut you down, before you can shut others down. Rightly so.

  8. 23 minutes ago, ayrmad said:

    I think that was Cameron & Co's attempt at keeping their own LEAVER's on side after a remain vote, between that and making absolutely no plans for BREXIT just shows how arrogantly out of touch they were with the electorate.

    Or his attempt at increasing the chances of their being a leave vote? Because he was a leaver the whole time.

  9. 7 minutes ago, a1974h said:

    Spoken like a deluded Nazi.

    Scotland's  Voice was recognised when the majority voted to Remain part of the U.K.

    And Then the UK voted to leave the Euro.

    Do you not understand democracy?

    and did you actually read your ballot paper ?

    apologies to the pendantic  weirdo who doesn't like bad grammar 

    You seem somewhat delighted that Scotland voted to remain in the UK for somebody who apparently voted to leave. Quite bizarre.
    You seem even more delighted (for someone who supported Scottish Independence) that Scotland is being dragged out of the EU despite voting to remain a part of it. Again, rather bizarre.

×
×
  • Create New...