Jump to content

JamJar

Gold Members
  • Posts

    13
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by JamJar

  1. 2 hours ago, Rudolph Hucker said:

    Had to laugh reading the Morton board earlier - there was virginton accusing JJ of "insulting the intelligence of the fan base". Vt has been doing the same for years on an almost daily basis. 

    "Do as I say, not as I do". What a pillock. 

    You mean, people still post on that site?

    I was banned for being accused of being someone I'm not, if that makes sense. I've since found out that Admin* bans anyone who disagrees with them. 

    Democracy at it's finest. 

    *Also known as c***s.

  2. 1 hour ago, Rudolph Hucker said:

    ..... So, let's be clear here. Are you advocating that the Morton fans boo the team onto tha Park, and continue to hound them for the full 90 minutes until either results improve or JJ is gone? Really? 

    Do you have to work hard at being such a complete twat or does it come naturally? 

    Please don't taunt him mate. He might start on the Brian Wake patter.

  3. 32 minutes ago, Branch Ton said:

    Read all about it in the SFA Judicial Panel Protocol 2019/19 . 

    The case is about Falkirk facilitating McKinnon’ s contract breach by engaging him before his Morton contract expired. A minimum of seven days notice was required and if he had just walked and waited a week before he worked for Falkirk he might have been all right.

    What page is that on mate?

  4. 9 minutes ago, Branch Ton said:

    In the example you quote you would need to apply to a panel of three judges for permission to introduce. 

    At this Tribunal you cannot introduce new evidence and the appeal must be on a point of law. One can only assume your chair lives in a parallel universe if she thinks there is a point of law she can pray in aid of in that judgment mauling. 

    You've lost me mate. This wasn't any kind of legal tribunal, at best it was an internal investigation of an organisation. No 'laws' were broken from what I can see.

    From what I've read, Falkirk have been gullible by believing what McKinnon's agent had told them . It actually looks as if it was McKinnon who tapped up Falkirk rather than Falkirk tapping up McKinnon. Maybe that's what the appeal is all about.

×
×
  • Create New...