Goomba
-
Posts
60 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Store
Posts posted by Goomba
-
-
13 hours ago, DeeTillEhDeh said:
And you didn't answer mine.
I'll make it easy for you.
Which part of the post you red-dotted did you disagree with?
First of all, you claimed I support him.
As another poster said you claimed he was in the Orange, which he is not, and the fact you see this as a stick to beat him with shows your bigoted nature.
"Nasty piece of work"? That's subjective, but given the nature of your posts I'd say "people in glass houses shouldn't throw stones" - maybe you should examine yourself first.
"All round shitebag" - see above.
Your post was just an attack based on your own personal prejudices rather than anything resembling logic or reason.
-9 -
58 minutes ago, RiG said:
It takes literally seconds to find a plethora of articles which confirm all of what @DeeTillEhDeh has said which begs the question why you support the guy when all of this kind of stuff is very much in the public domain.
Can only assume you misread my post?
0 -
2 hours ago, DeeTillEhDeh said:
Of course I red-dotted it. Your "facts" are nonsense.
I support him? Care to back this up?
-6 -
The speed at which Wingsy produces his articles is incredible.
He's bang on when it comes to exposing the shady and corrupt ways of the SNP and Greens.
He exposed the membership lies before anyone else. Remember that.
Having skimmed through the last couple of pages, some people just can't an alternative opinion without resorting to ad hominem.
-7 -
21 minutes ago, Benjamin_Nevis said:
Why do you think anyone would read the posts or links of a fairly obvious troll?
Dearie me.
Why were you told to change your name from Day Of The Lords mate?
0 -
4 hours ago, Benjamin_Nevis said:
When we want the joke opinions of a sock puppet account, we'll be sure to ask. Run along now.
Play nice Benjamin.
0 -
2 hours ago, Jeff Venom said:
That certainly answers the second part of my post. Perhaps I should've asked why should/does anyone care?
Because a party lying about it's membership figures is more than a bit dodgy.
0 -
1 hour ago, Benjamin_Nevis said:
He's not "iffy", he's a creepy wee homophobic, transphobic bigot whose weirdo opinions can be safely launched into the nearest bin.
He is right when it comes to the internal workings of the corrupt SNP.
-6 -
Wingsy is on form on Twitter today.
I'm surprised he hasn't been banned again as he's been dangerously close to the wind with his tweets lately.
0 -
42 minutes ago, Bodie said:
Because I don't think the debates should be catering to weirdos obsessed with the contents of other people's underpants tbh.
Aye, because that's exactly what happens
gEnItAl InSpEcToRs everywhere!
0 -
9 hours ago, Granny Danger said:
I’ve no idea what other folk will do, it’s their own choice. However. If Kate Forbes becomes leader I will terminate my membership and stop voting for the SNP.
#Forbes4Leader
0 -
41 minutes ago, virginton said:
Relatively speaking to whom? Starmer supports Brexit, is subservient to the gammon views of Red Wall England and his party is now getting the standard attention of corporate lobbyists who see the way the wind is blowing. There's no chance of him outflanking the SG on the left.
0 -
32 minutes ago, carpetmonster said:
I wonder at what point you’ll develop enough self awareness to realise that if you called Ronald McDonald a clown he’d laugh in your face and then the rest of the room would join in?
Before implying someone else doesn't have self awareness, it's a good idea to make sure you have some yourself.
Just a tip.
-1 -
7 hours ago, Inanimate Carbon Rod said:
Murdo Fraser panting about ‘itll come crashing down tomorrow’ type stuff. Bad news ahead?
Bad news? Only if you're a partitionist.
For most of us, the implosion of the SNP has been most welcome.
1 -
20 hours ago, Binos said:
Have you lost the ability to formulate sentences properly
He never had the ability to begin with.
-1 -
Im surprised none of the enlighted ones have called Kate Forbes a GeNiTaL iNsPeCtOr yet
-6 -
11 minutes ago, hk blues said:
Looks like something out of Alice in Wonderland.
Horrific.
Decent incontinence pads.
0 -
7 minutes ago, Benjamin_Nevis said:
I didn't actually say that. Try reading the post again.
You're digging a hole for yourself mate.
0 -
8 hours ago, carpetmonster said:
Yes. She’s Islamophobic, has openly praised Yaxley-Lennon before, had Proud Boys provide her ‘security’ on more than one occasion in the US - Chicago and IIRC Miami.
Believe me, I’m familiar with the ‘eVErYthINg I doNT LiKe IS fasCISM’ trope, however I do have a degree in English and am aware there’s a whole coterie of descriptors in my quiver. I try and select accurately. Maybe you should be asking those who’d describe her as a TERF what the f**k is feminist about her proclaiming - direct quote - “Each and every one of you women who stand in my way… will be annihilated”. Can you tell me?
You're really scraping the barrel.
'Islamophobia' (another false accusation no doubt), praise for Tommy Robinson and security from the Proud Boys are not evidence of fascism.
You have zero evidence of fascism from KJK. Oswald Mosley she ain't.
-10 -
15 hours ago, carpetmonster said:
She’s a fascist, her demo attenders are bussed in from here, there and everywhere and they were still outnumbered by the counter protest.
ETA - I presume some of the number such as Graham Linehan and Alistair ‘Manky Jaiket’ McConnachie got there under their own steam.
Fascist? Really?
0 -
KJK is one annoying nyaff, but she's building some movement here.
Scots don't want this.
-6 -
Surely Sturgeon is on borrowed time now?
The SNP have plummeted in the polls following all this gender stuff, as has support for independence itself.
She could easily have avoided it all by just going along with public opinion, as she's previously done with other issues.
-2 -
5 minutes ago, Salt n Vinegar said:
The main focus of the programme appears to me to have been about difficulties caused by a reserved act of the UK Parliament.
As the proposed Scottish legislation - which for the benefit of the hard of thinking is obviously NOT in effect - has had no impact whatsoever on the current prison related examples, if there is a problem, it must relate to the existing legislation. The double rapist who now wishes to be referred to as female is doing it under the existing legislation and is being dealt with under its provisions.
As I understand it, and I'm happy to be corrected, the main implications of the proposed Scottish legislation are that the minimum age drops from 18 to 16, the requirement for a medical or other "diagnosis" is removed and the minimum period for living in the new identity is reduced to 3 months (longer if at the younger end of the range). None of these seem to open the floodgates for abusive men or allow them to do anything they can't already do.
I fail to see what difference any of these issues would have made in the current controversial cases. Wicked men don't seem to need a certificate to abuse women at the moment, regardless of venue or the possession of a certificate and (again, as I understand it) the Equalities Act (reserved legislation) covers access issues to ban folk with or without a certificate from these spaces to protect women.
About time Westminster sorted out their mess, IMO.
As for that particular "ship" having sailed in 2014, I think you might find that it has returned to port and is attracting a considerable number of new crew members and passengers
.
It has only returned to port with all the functionality of an SNP ferry.
The issue was settled in 2014.
-2 -
Great to see no independence chat on last night's QT, other than one audience member briefly slating it at the end.
That ship sailed in 2014.
1
Stuart Campbell/Wings Over Scotland
in The Politics Forum
Posted
You have completely ignored my points so Im not going to bother replying to yours either, and wont be drinking from any puddle.
Have a good day