Jump to content

AndyBud

Gold Members
  • Posts

    85
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by AndyBud

  1. Yes, if any donor had bothered to read the small print.

    I said from the beginning you would have to be questioned if you gave to the fund, with the terms by which it could be used.

    What a nice couple huh. I'm sure the old grannies that gave £5 did so so that Kate and Gerry wouldn't have to work again.

    I was pretty shocked when I read the fund was covering their living expenses and paying them a wage. Especially as she is now looking at a career change, in a lower paid field, and he can't decide whether to return to work.

    Was it ever agreed that the fund would pay for their legal fees? I seem to remember there needed to be a vote from the board of the trust, but I don't think I ever read of the outcome.

  2. On radio 5 earlier:

    'We need to end all this speculation and stick to the facts! The fact is that I've known Kate and Gerry for four years and they couldn't possibly have had anything to do with Madeleine's disappearance.'

    It might be better if we have a separate thread for ludicrous comments by Mccann family & friends. :P

  3. Thats the thing though. They are on the front pages now, not the lassie.

    People are starting to think more about the parents and their behaviour than the search for the kid. That has become something of a side issue now.

    Either way, whether its the parents as the focus of the article/TV slot, or the little girl, they are both instantly linked. They're keeping the search for her in the headlines, which is their main aim.

    I would disagree that the search for her has become a side issue.

  4. I just get the feeling that someone is advising them badly now. They must have someone booking them to do things like the Festival, going on the old "all publicity is good publicity" thang.

    I don't think that is the case here though. It's not going to achieve anything in what should be their only priority at the moment and that is what is swaying people away from them.

    Advising them badly...? Despite being still on the front page of the national news? :blink:

    Seems like pretty good advice they're taking.

  5. The key's are still in the locks ... our doors don't have any windows that someone could smash and then use the keys

    You've hit on a subject close to my heart though , I sometimes leave for work just after 5am and need to remove the key from the inside before I can lock the door from the outside ... If I can't find a second key I'd never take the 'original' one thinking Mrs Ned could just use the back door , I post they key back through (Does that make sense :unsure: )

    Kinda :P

    Doesn't leaving the keys in the lock, make the lock redundant though :blink: (In the sense that the local paedophile only has to turn the key to steal your children)

  6. He commited a crime and was sent to jail but many people felt it should never have went to court on compassionate grounds. Where do you draw the line?

    Understand ;)

    He shot someone in the back, as they ran away. Hardly the same as parents going for a meal, and leaving their daughter sleeping in their apartment a yards away.

  7. The number of parents on this thread who wouldn't do what these parents have done is amazing!

    I'm in no way the perfect Father but i'd never leave a child alone in a house no matter the reason

    I'm sure you wouldn't, but if you did I don't think it makes you a bad parent.

    I'm sure all parents make mistakes, its just unfortunate that this couple made one which led to their child being abducted.

    I also don't see much difference in them leaving the kids sleeping upstairs, and them being downstairs in a large house, or being out in their garden. However I don't think the reaction would be the same.

  8. I did say - either in this thread or another of the two where this conversation is also taking place - that some of the finest Scots dialect in English is incorrect. I just think in the case of outwith it sounds clumsy and, well, wrong.

    I recognise Scots as a separate language, as it was regarded until a couple of hundred years ago, so I can weasel out of this by saying that when I speak English, I tend to do so "correctly" :D Which isn't to say I use some peculiarly Scottish words in my everyday language, but "outwith" isn't one of them.

    American English is incorrect in Standard English, generally. "Honor", "color" and all that tripe.

    Quite a few languages have regional differences. Chinese has many different formats with differences between what is used in Maninland China to what is used in say Taiwan or Hong Kong.....

    The US just use a regional version of English. So it can't be incorrect compared to "standard English" as its comparing apples with oranges.

×
×
  • Create New...