Dons_1988 Posted January 19, 2016 Share Posted January 19, 2016 Probably the most engaging debates I read on this website are two people arguing over which one is "seething" 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scottxs Posted January 19, 2016 Share Posted January 19, 2016 Probably the most engaging debates I read on this website are two people arguing over which one is "seething"I'm seething that no one else is really seething at the moment 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The DA Posted January 19, 2016 Share Posted January 19, 2016 I'm seething that no one else is really seething at the moment ^^^^^^^^^^^Not really seething^^^^^^^^^^^^ 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacksgranda Posted January 19, 2016 Share Posted January 19, 2016 (edited) Pioneers. Gallant? I see it's been done - hardly surprising since it's 6 hours since the post. That'll teach me to go to a funeral! Edited January 19, 2016 by Jacksgranda 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ken Fitlike Posted January 19, 2016 Share Posted January 19, 2016 ^^^^^^^^^^^Not really seething^^^^^^^^^^^^ I'm seething at that comment. I bet that new bear blogger would blow up any seethe-o-meter that science could come up with.... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacksgranda Posted January 19, 2016 Share Posted January 19, 2016 Did we really expect anything else from the permantley paranoid tedi ? You might want to stick a comma in there after paranoid. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Njord Posted January 19, 2016 Share Posted January 19, 2016 Why would I do that? What do people with names like weejinky67 and iluvtehra feel the need to ask him if insist he is a Freemason? To say he has been accused of it begets that he implies he is not. So a link would be helpful. Iluvtehra would come from teh huddleboard imo. weejinky67 from führer führer. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted January 19, 2016 Share Posted January 19, 2016 So the interpretation of a single persons mood, by a collective of Rangers fans allows sweeping generalisation and in fact misinterpretstion of others? It was just mildly amusing that we had Norman's wee self-obsessed rant only a few posts after yours. One doesn't have to look hard for examples of sweeping generalisations either. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Njord Posted January 19, 2016 Share Posted January 19, 2016 He has denied it in the hootsman BBC also running with it now "One of the blogs insists that I am a Freemason, which is wrong," said the judge.[/size] Why do people / bloggers feel the need to insist he is a freemason? Hence why I want a link as proof. He says he isn't, why that is not proof. Even with my upstanding proddy background/surname , I wouldn't want to be tried by the shady cunto. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aofjays Posted January 19, 2016 Share Posted January 19, 2016 It was just mildly amusing that we had Norman's wee self-obsessed rant only a few posts after yours. One doesn't have to look hard for examples of sweeping generalisations either. Too right. Some disingenuine was calling rangers fans handsome the other day. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted January 19, 2016 Share Posted January 19, 2016 (edited) He has denied it in the hootsman BBC also running with it now "One of the blogs insists that I am a Freemason, which is wrong," said the judge. Why do people / bloggers feel the need to insist he is a freemason? Because the quote I posted from the paranoid Hibee earlier is a view shared by a surprisingly large number of people. They cannot believe that the judiciary/police/footballing authorities/4th Estate are impartial and objective wrt Rangers and are convinced there's a Masonic network centred on Ibrox which protects us from getting our just deserts. Edited January 19, 2016 by The_Kincardine 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacksgranda Posted January 19, 2016 Share Posted January 19, 2016 Because the quote I posted from the paranoid Hibee earlier is a view shared by a surprisingly large number of people. They cannot believe that the judiciary/police/footballing authorities/4th Estate are impartial and objective wrt Rangers and are convinced there's a Masonic network centred on Ibrox which protects us from getting our just deserts. Aye, you've just been in the wilderness these last 4 seasons. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
youngsy Posted January 19, 2016 Share Posted January 19, 2016 Hence why I want a link as proof. He says he isn't, why that is not proof. Even with my upstanding proddy background/surname , I wouldn't want to be tried by the shady cunto. http://fallingmasonry.info/masonic-judges.html If Peter Smith was a Freemason it's likely that he would be on this list as it's mainly a list of English judges who are Masons. There is no proof to say he is a Mason, he has denied that he is in the Craft and if he was a Mason, it's very unlikely he would deny it. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted January 19, 2016 Share Posted January 19, 2016 Or they've changed them ? Who knows, you certainly can't trust them. Anyhoo, Tedi was that impressed by doleman & ill Phil and their blogging, hes decided to give it a go himself. Give him a fortnight afore he's looking for funding too. Fucking bam https://bearsfightback.wordpress.com/2016/01/17/welcome-to-bears-fight-back/ Crikey. Magnificent stuff. These guys plan to find legal methods of depriving people of their money, spouses and kids. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted January 19, 2016 Share Posted January 19, 2016 f**k up Norman Not a particularly strong challenge to WRK's claim that the contents of his thoughtful post would sail over your head. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Justin Z Posted January 19, 2016 Share Posted January 19, 2016 ...Rangers and are convinced there's a Masonic network centred on Ibrox which protects us from getting our just deserts. Aye, you've just been in the wilderness these last 4 seasons. Believe it or not that's actually the correct original spelling. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted January 19, 2016 Share Posted January 19, 2016 Because the quote I posted from the paranoid Hibee earlier is a view shared by a surprisingly large number of people. They cannot believe that the judiciary/police/footballing authorities/4th Estate are impartial and objective wrt Rangers and are convinced there's a Masonic network centred on Ibrox which protects us from getting our just deserts. There is a conspiracy of sorts, not a conscious deliberate one and not one that there's any evidence of involving the judiciary. The police, the media and the footballing authorities however, certainly behave in concerted ways which favour the Scottish footballing establishment. This establishment involves Celtic every bit as much as it does Rangers. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobWilliamson Posted January 19, 2016 Share Posted January 19, 2016 Crikey. Magnificent stuff. These guys plan to find legal methods of depriving people of their money, spouses and kids. Magnificent is not the word I would use to describe that nonsense. I don't mind the paranoid nutters embarrassing themselves but people like that are an embarrasement to the rest of the support and the club itself 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacksgranda Posted January 19, 2016 Share Posted January 19, 2016 Believe it or not that's actually the correct original spelling. I knew I should have checked first! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobWilliamson Posted January 19, 2016 Share Posted January 19, 2016 There is a conspiracy of sorts, not a conscious deliberate one and not one that there's any evidence of involving the judiciary. The police, the media and the footballing authorities however, certainly behave in concerted ways which favour the Scottish footballing establishment. This establishment involves Celtic every bit as much as it does Rangers. People really believe this? Now that is magnificent. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.