bennett Posted March 3, 2016 Share Posted March 3, 2016 which 'Rangers' are you talking about? The Old Liquidated club or the New 'name changed from Sevco' club? As time goes on it will serve us all well to keep the distinction clear as most Ibrox related people and the SMSM would prefer the Great Lie to become accepted truth. SMSM aye you've got to watch those yins right enough, thank God for the ever vigilant bloggers. -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Solitaire Posted March 4, 2016 Share Posted March 4, 2016 which 'Rangers' are you talking about? The Old Liquidated club or the New 'name changed from Sevco' club? As time goes on it will serve us all well to keep the distinction clear as most Ibrox related people and the SMSM would prefer the Great Lie to become accepted truth. He's maybe talking about the only club the SFA, SF and UEFA acknowledge.... I.e the one leading the Championship right now. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
strichener Posted March 4, 2016 Share Posted March 4, 2016 He's maybe talking about the only club the SFA, SF and UEFA acknowledge.... I.e the one leading the Championship right now. I think the SFA recognise more than 1 club. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ken Fitlike Posted March 4, 2016 Share Posted March 4, 2016 He's maybe talking about the only club the SFA, SF and UEFA acknowledge.... I.e the one leading the Championship right now. The New club, then. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Njord Posted March 4, 2016 Share Posted March 4, 2016 And by the way, your use of 'Klan' is frankly embarrassing. My PM inbox would appear to agree. The thought of the contents of the 'circular' is amusing at least. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ned Nederlander Posted March 4, 2016 Share Posted March 4, 2016 Naw, I was just informed by a handful at an early stage that THE KING was strictly to be ignored (no Rangers fans BTW). By PM ? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
forever_blue Posted March 4, 2016 Share Posted March 4, 2016 By PM ? David Cameron posts on here , bet he's a nationalist alias on the politics forum 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave.j Posted March 4, 2016 Share Posted March 4, 2016 So, a group of random folk, none of whom are rangers fans, decided to PM you to suggest you ignore a poster? That seems legit. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE KING Posted March 4, 2016 Share Posted March 4, 2016 Very Klanish behaviour. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE KING Posted March 4, 2016 Share Posted March 4, 2016 To be honest mate, that isn't particularly a denial. At least you're admitting it now. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE KING Posted March 4, 2016 Share Posted March 4, 2016 Lol celebrate an unbroken timeline?! http://rangers.co.uk/news/headlines/follow-with-pride-2/#.VtmmuRxG3vE.twitter 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted March 4, 2016 Share Posted March 4, 2016 Lol celebrate an unbroken timeline?! http://rangers.co.uk/news/headlines/follow-with-pride-2/#.VtmmuRxG3vE.twitter I saw this on the 'Yer Deid' thread. It's a laughable statement. It's an attempt to warn their own fans to behave like civilised people. To do so though, that appeal must be couched in terms of displaying "contempt" towards others. I'm also intrigued by the "legal judgement" they got on continuation. Overall, the statement once more highlights the towering insecurity that both engulfs and characterises the club. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stonedsailor Posted March 4, 2016 Share Posted March 4, 2016 Defo tears. Go get yourself a tissue then. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted March 4, 2016 Share Posted March 4, 2016 Defo tears. If somebody constructs a post that contains points, do you really think it's clever, or witty to just ignore the points and instead write "tears"? You might even do it in response to this post if you like. It just highlights that you've nothing to actually say though. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted March 4, 2016 Share Posted March 4, 2016 In response to your posts it's fucking Shakespearean. How would that work? Do you mean 'in comparison'? Still doesn't really follow though. Pretty unsuccessful all round, I'd say. Are you a fan of Shakespeare's work? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henrik's tongue Posted March 4, 2016 Share Posted March 4, 2016 How would that work?Do you mean 'in comparison'? Still doesn't really follow though. Pretty unsuccessful all round, I'd say. Are you a fan of Shakespeare's work? Mind Shakespeare's Sister? They were shite. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shull Posted March 4, 2016 Share Posted March 4, 2016 BLUE BIGOT VERMIN FC 1873 ( DECEASED ) 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shull Posted March 4, 2016 Share Posted March 4, 2016 THE NEWCUNTO FC 2012 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE KING Posted March 4, 2016 Share Posted March 4, 2016 Another statement telling everyone their not bothered...lol 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted March 4, 2016 Share Posted March 4, 2016 Another statement telling everyone their not bothered...lol How're you getting on with your finding evidence that The Ku Klux Klan appointed Billy Fullerton as their Scottish ambassador? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.