Jump to content

Big Rangers Administration/Liquidation Thread - All chat here!


Recommended Posts

39 minutes ago, sugna said:

Yes, very strange. Reminds me a lot of the years leading up to February 2012 in that particular respect.

You make an excellent point.

I suppose if there is a difference - and I'm not saying there is - then it might be that, this time, the audited accounts say additional loans are required from a specific source in order to survive; and that the director who has promised to deliver the loans has separately claimed to have no discretion over the source's funds.

Not sure if those two claims conflict in any significant way. I suppose if they did, then we might expect to see players loaned-out and loaned-in this month, rather then transfer fees being paid.

Some people are reading a helluva lot into the Murphy loan with option to buy transfer. You would think that Rangers were the only Scottish Club  or Club forced to  stay & play in Scotland who have ever taken a player on loan.

Perhaps there is a financial shortfall at Ibrox that precludes the immediate payment of the full fee, if so a loan and buy later deal makes sense. Perhaps with the uncertainty of Murty's position, the Club are simply being ultra careful with the transfer fund after allowing Pedro to piss millions against the wall. 

If Rangers do indeed go in to Admin 2 then I will be the first to admit that I am wrong, however I do feel that the recent frenzy amongst the more dedicated of the obsessed is simply no more than wishful thinking on their part.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, Jakes Pal said:

Some people are reading a helluva lot into the Murphy loan with option to buy transfer. You would think that Rangers were the only Scottish Club  or Club forced to  stay & play in Scotland who have ever taken a player on loan.

Perhaps there is a financial shortfall at Ibrox that precludes the immediate payment of the full fee, if so a loan and buy later deal makes sense. Perhaps with the uncertainty of Murty's position, the Club are simply being ultra careful with the transfer fund after allowing Pedro to piss millions against the wall. 

If Rangers do indeed go in to Admin 2 then I will be the first to admit that I am wrong, however I do feel that the recent frenzy amongst the more dedicated of the obsessed is simply no more than wishful thinking on their part.

No No, you've got this all wrong - you have to claim to have been duped, then threaten a clown.

'Admin 2' ?

what was the outcome of 'Admin 1'?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Jakes Pal said:

Strange that there is no mention of the impending Admin in any mainstream media outlets. Also strange that Rangers have applied for and been granted  a building warrant for recladding the roofs on the Copland, Broomie  & Sandy Jardine. I would imagine that there must be other priorities for the money if the situation is that dire. 

As I said, strange. 

But Philip said....

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, Jakes Pal said:

Some people are reading a helluva lot into the Murphy loan with option to buy transfer. You would think that Sevco were the only Scottish Club  or Club forced to  stay & play in Scotland who have ever taken a player on loan.

Perhaps there is a financial shortfall at Ibrox that precludes the immediate payment of the full fee, if so a loan and buy later deal makes sense. Perhaps with the uncertainty of Murty's position, the Club are simply being ultra careful with the transfer fund after allowing Pedro to piss millions against the wall. 

If Sevco do indeed go in to Admin 1 then I will be the first to admit that I am wrong, however I do feel that the recent frenzy amongst the more dedicated of the obsessed is simply no more than wishful thinking on their part.

There......FTFY!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Sting777 said:

He is saying similar things that he was saying months before Rangers fell into administration in 2012 and as usual the Ibrox gullibillies are rubbushing it....lol

Do you give him donations?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 09/01/2018 at 10:36, Florentine_Pogen said:

Lest we forget.........from The Scotsman...........some yearsago..........:whistle

By STEPHEN HALLIDAY
Published on Wednesday 4 July 2012 21:26

SCOTTISH Football Association chief executive Stewart Regan has issued a startling warning of "social unrest" in Scotland if newco Rangers are denied entry to the First Division of the Scottish Football League following the emphatic rejection today of their application to retain top-flight football at Ibrox.

<snip>

I was more annoyed at the "5 clubs dead in a month" article but there was a lot going on at the time and Reagan's social unrest stuff was merely a small part of a huge clusterfuck of media/administrators/chairmen losing the head on a daily basis - but reading that back a few years later after that chapter played out in a demonstrably less armageddon-y way - it's actually difficult to get your head round the level of craven, uninformed pish that he came out with.

For the "head" of Scottish football to explicitly say that Scottish football is just the OF - and without a functional Rangers-Celtic duopoly, that the game would die a lingering death is *mental* - this is the c**t that's meant to be securing sponsors and talking the game up - how can someone with so little credibility and a terrible record still be in an actual job? 

The interesting part is that the scare stories are utterly spent - if this version of Rangers were to have an "insolvency event" similar to the old version, it wouldn't be remotely tenable to even try that sort of pish again - you can only turn the bullshit up to 11 once (and there is a clear precedent in place for how it should be dealt with). 

Also - SPL2.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Swello said:

I was more annoyed at the "5 clubs dead in a month" article but there was a lot going on at the time and Reagan's social unrest stuff was merely a small part of a huge clusterfuck of media/administrators/chairmen losing the head on a daily basis - but reading that back a few years later after that chapter played out in a demonstrably less armageddon-y way - it's actually difficult to get your head round the level of craven, uninformed pish that he came out with.

For the "head" of Scottish football to explicitly say that Scottish football is just the OF - and without a functional Rangers-Celtic duopoly, that the game would die a lingering death is *mental* - this is the c**t that's meant to be securing sponsors and talking the game up - how can someone with so little credibility and a terrible record still be in an actual job? 

The interesting part is that the scare stories are utterly spent - if this version of Rangers were to have an "insolvency event" similar to the old version, it wouldn't be remotely tenable to even try that sort of pish again - you can only turn the bullshit up to 11 once (and there is a clear precedent in place for how it should be dealt with). 

Also - SPL2.

 

I found myself getting furious reading the article.

I knew about the "slow lingering death" and "withering on the vine" soundbites, but seeing his entire case set out like that, while knowing that he remains in a post that's meant to require impartiality, is just enraging.

Being so spectacularly wrong is one thing; but the ignorant, dismissive prejudice required to reach his view is another.  He should be confronted with that article everywhere he goes.

It's a staggering read.

Edited by Monkey Tennis
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Jakes Pal said:

Oh look, the wee lamb has changed all the Rangers words to Sevco. 

How cute. Bless the wee soul, as long as it keeps him happy.

You obviously missed the changing of Admin 2 to Admin 1 as well, but no surprise there sweetie! Selective reading as usual from a Sevconian. You keep your head buried under the blankets....lol

Edited by Sting777
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...