deerokus Posted May 10, 2012 Share Posted May 10, 2012 whats going on with the bbc thing can someone fill me in? Someone is going to court to have the new BBC doc on Rangers by Mark Daly suppressed. It seems that it's not about Whyte this time, which makes me think it'll be either an investigation into Murray and player registrations, or D&P's role in all of this. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
itzdrk Posted May 10, 2012 Share Posted May 10, 2012 Earlier today:- Someone is going to court to have the new BBC doc on Rangers by Mark Daly suppressed. It seems that it's not about Whyte this time, which makes me think it'll be either an investigation into Murray and player registrations, or D&P's role in all of this. chrz guyssss 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
roverthemoon Posted May 10, 2012 Share Posted May 10, 2012 That thread on RM about bringing back 'the policy' highlights perfectly why it's better for everyone that this club dies and dies now. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Co.Down Hibee Posted May 10, 2012 Share Posted May 10, 2012 Someone is going to court to have the new BBC doc on Rangers by Mark Daly suppressed. It seems that it's not about Whyte this time, which makes me think it'll be either an investigation into Murray and player registrations, or D&P's role in all of this. what was fat sally saying again about everything being out in the open 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobby_F Posted May 10, 2012 Share Posted May 10, 2012 There were a number of threats on that thread. The police would have a field day if they took the new laws seriously. It's important to preserve RM, however, to remind us all just how big a collective c**t the Rangers support is. The Big Website must stay open! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshbairn Posted May 10, 2012 Share Posted May 10, 2012 I heard he had interviewed several ex-players about EBTs and double contracts, and the lawyers told him to cut them from the show. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Kincardine Posted May 10, 2012 Share Posted May 10, 2012 That thread on RM about bringing back 'the policy' highlights perfectly why it's better for everyone that this club dies and dies now. I'm not a member of RM unlike yourself. I did have a quick browse through and couldn't see a thread about "bringing back 'the policy'". Could you post a link? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shull Posted May 10, 2012 Share Posted May 10, 2012 I'm not a member of RM unlike yourself. I did have a quick browse through and couldn't see a thread about "bringing back 'the policy'". Could you post a link? http://forum.rangersmedia.co.uk/index.php?showtopic=219645 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~~~ Posted May 10, 2012 Share Posted May 10, 2012 I'm not a member of RM unlike yourself. I did have a quick browse through and couldn't see a thread about "bringing back 'the policy'". Could you post a link? http://forum.rangersmedia.co.uk/index.php?showtopic=219645&st=0&p=1060023601entry1060023601 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ReasonableGeezer Posted May 10, 2012 Share Posted May 10, 2012 (edited) post number 9 I'm not a member of RM unlike yourself. I did have a quick browse through and couldn't see a thread about "bringing back 'the policy'". Could you post a link? Edited to add: The whole thread is shockingly offensive, so really post number nine is just a small sample of the knuckle dragging scum attitude that should be eradicated from our society permanently. These pondlife totally disgust me. How does this forum manage to stay online. I thought there were laws against things like that? Edited May 10, 2012 by ReasonableGeezer 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Co.Down Hibee Posted May 10, 2012 Share Posted May 10, 2012 I'm not a member of RM unlike yourself. I did have a quick browse through and couldn't see a thread about "bringing back 'the policy'". Could you post a link? This is really going to endear them to new buyers , time to move on perhaps 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshbairn Posted May 10, 2012 Share Posted May 10, 2012 Excerpt from RM Editorial: I deliberately used the Pearl Harbour analogy because it describes precisely the behaviour of the Scottish media throughout the Rangers administration saga. Not for us an understanding and helping hand but, rather, wave after wave of unremitting and unrelenting attacks much like those unleashed by the Japanese on the unsuspecting American fleet anchored at Pearl Harbour. For them the demise of our great club will not be a, ‘date which will live in infamy’ but, rather, a date to be celebrated much like the sneaky Japanese attack on sleepy Hawaii. Enemies within and enemies without 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
exiled jambo Posted May 10, 2012 Share Posted May 10, 2012 Excerpt from RM Editorial: Enemies within and enemies without Just how out of touch with reality can people get ? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
craigkillie Posted May 10, 2012 Share Posted May 10, 2012 I think he meant in respect that if you'd been out the country and stumbled into a Rangers game, you'd still be seeing McGregor, Whittaker, McCulloch, Aluko & Co in blue jerseys, and not some bunch of kids and a handful of lower-earning pros.... which is what we should be seeing, if Haudit & Daudit had done their job properly. They did do their job properly in terms of making savings on their player budget, it's just that they did it by blackmailing players into taking wage cuts rather than by sacking staff members. Their wage bill was reduced substantially, but they still managed to keep the squad together to secure 2nd place (and the prize money which comes with this), and managed to keep potentially sellable assets on the book. That was about the only thing they've done right. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~~~ Posted May 10, 2012 Share Posted May 10, 2012 Just how out of touch with reality can people get ? Is that a serious question? Correct, when we are back success is a given.Been downhill ever since we lost the propaganda war against that lot, convincing people we are the bad guys, This group of scum who hate our beliefs, our country, who celebrate acts of terrorism against innocent people We have scum in almost every section of the media these days, just whispering away telling everyone how bad we are etc.... and slowly over time people are starting to believe it. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
forkboy Posted May 10, 2012 Share Posted May 10, 2012 Excerpt from RM Editorial: Enemies within and enemies without It's really galling. How more sucking up do the media need to do before Rangers fans are happy exactly? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
exiled jambo Posted May 11, 2012 Share Posted May 11, 2012 Is that a serious question? I'm not sure what it is but your avatar is rather hypnotic, I could watch that for hours. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ayrmad Posted May 11, 2012 Share Posted May 11, 2012 (edited) Apart from that RM being full of zoomers the fcuking site makes their ads like posts and they're targeted at things I search for all day every day, annoying as fcuk. Always posted at 4:21pm. Edited May 11, 2012 by ayrmad 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Kincardine Posted May 11, 2012 Share Posted May 11, 2012 (edited) post number 9 Edited to add: The whole thread is shockingly offensive, so really post number nine is just a small sample of the knuckle dragging scum attitude that should be eradicated from our society permanently. These pondlife totally disgust me. How does this forum manage to stay online. I thought there were laws against things like that? I've not read this before and have no great interest in RM. Parts of the thread are distasteful. To say the, "whole thread is shockingly offensive" is a wee bit dramatic. Some quips are humorous - so it certainly isn't 'the whole thread'. Sad, though, that a few of our support haven't moved on in a generation. David Holmes was the Chief Exec who broke 'the policy' in the 1980s. What he said was sensible: Edited to tidy up some typos. Edited May 11, 2012 by Kincardine 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GirondistNYC Posted May 11, 2012 Share Posted May 11, 2012 1336692985[/url]' post='6223011']Excerpt from RM Editorial: Enemies within and enemies without I find the Pearl Harbor analogy quite apt. After all, FDR had been trying to sell it for years but found it difficult due to the long standing rumors about weak air defenses. Also, in November of 1940 a Japaneses blogger started a website called "Pearl Harbor Defenseless Against Carrier Attack". Lastly, when the new Naval commandant was appointed in 1941 basic research indicated he had been banned from command positions for eight years due to misconduct. The situation was exactly the same. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.