Jump to content

Big Rangers Administration/Liquidation Thread - All chat here!


Recommended Posts

You are

won't dignify Ibrox chief executive Charles Green's statement with a response

It is with huge disappointment that we read both the content and tone of the statement

However, we do not intend to enter into a war of words with Rangers or to dignify their position by responding in kind

Now you may agree with the statement, however you are not a football club chairman, it was only ever going to inflame things even further, which it did, they should have just said "We note rangers recent statement and will contact the SFA for further guidance"

As I said both Men have not acted like professional football club chairmen and have allowed emotion to get in the way, for different reasons

I think tomorrow I'll look out both the statements and post them in full.

To compare the above (a selected paragraph) with what Green said, not forgetting that in terms of club v club officials, he instigated it is preposterous.

You know, sometimes it really can be the case that one party acts like a fool without the whataboutery.

I'm going to bed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am still waiting on the RST statement on the prospectus, they have some hot shot bluenose lawyer looking at it (not Paul Mcconville)

and ok I got you one of these, just to remind you, if it quacks like a duck :P

btdrang.jpg

:lol: :lol:

It'll sink ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am still waiting on the RST statement on the prospectus, they have some hot shot bluenose lawyer looking at it (not Paul Mcconville)

and ok I got you one of these, just to remind you, if it quacks like a duck :P

btdrang.jpg

If it quacks like a duck, Tedi will think it's a duck, whether it's a rubber bath toy or a wooden hunting call.

FAU-SC77.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Front page of the Record: 67 players are suing Rangers.

Back page of the Record: We don't want to sue you - Rangers players who are still getting paid decry SPFA legal action.

Page 48 of the Record: Charles Green's opinion on the matter, reported uncritically.

Looks like this is going to be the line - "Rangers are facing a scurrilous attack by traitorous former players who are trying to take advantage of the club's predicament".

Give it a week, and the SPFA will be a "biased" group that has an "agenda" "against Rangers", and all posts here by Rangers fans will look something like this....

"Independent" players union, eh? :lol: :lol: :lol:

Charles Green will beat these turncoat sh*tebags in court :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Front page of the Record: 67 players are suing Rangers.

Back page of the Record: We don't want to sue you - Rangers players who are still getting paid decry SPFA legal action.

Page 48 of the Record: Charles Green's opinion on the matter, reported uncritically.

Looks like this is going to be the line - "Rangers are facing a scurrilous attack by traitorous former players who are trying to take advantage of the club's predicament".

Give it a week, and the SPFA will be a "biased" group that has an "agenda" "against Rangers", and all posts here by Rangers fans will look something like this....

"Independent" players union, eh? :lol: :lol: :lol:

Charles Green will beat these turncoat sh*tebags in court :D

I saw this development. Can anyone shed any further light on it? What does it actually mean?

Might break up all the squabbling on here for a day or so...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really cannot fathom out what Bennett posted that can be taken so far out of context.

Neither can i, i reckon the guys just had a bad night and let rip. If anyone on here knows Claymores, could you get in touch with him and see that he's ok?

That was out of character for him and i thought his few posts on the subject were a piss take at first and was a bit of an arsehole myself in return.

Edited by bennett
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I saw this development. Can anyone shed any further light on it? What does it actually mean?

Might break up all the squabbling on here for a day or so...

It seems to me that the PFA have put in an action on behalf of all players who were involved in TUPE, and some others too, based on maybe the wishes of one or two, or perhaps more but it seems not the 67 as a whole.

Currently a few of the ex players who I assume make up the 67 have distanced themselves from it, Naismith, McCabe and Wylde off the top of my head.

Now Charles Green is coating the situation in hyperbole as is his want.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...