Jump to content

Big Rangers Administration/Liquidation Thread - All chat here!


Recommended Posts

And no quadruple either..............awwwww - will you be there cheering on the goys when they lift the small box of twiglets after Saturday's game?

Youngsy will be along to answer that question shortly, I'm sure...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

FFS - I included 3 salient points for consideration and concluded with the question "Shouldn't the licence be revoked?". Do you need a road map and set of instructions every time you go for a piss too?

All you did was regurgitate ridiculous old pap. Nothing that you said was interesting or original in any way None of you, "3 salient points" were either salient or even prescient. All you have done is rehash the tawdry old arguments from at least a year ago.

Learn how to fucking read what better posters have said before you make your "3 points", Salient Boy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry Benny the Ball - but the prize for winning the Scottish Third is Ten Bob and one small box of twiglets between the 500 million supporters worldwide

Edit: how does it feel to have an inferior points tally as when EFFC last won the Third? Wasn't the third all that matters and sod going for the quadruple?

Awww truly heart breaking lad, how can this be??? I'm away for a cry.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awww truly heart breaking lad, how can this be??? I'm away for a cry.

The utter fandan just gave me a Helen for simply quoting him. The Ps &Ds have gone to hell in a handbasket these days.

Edited to add: I remember......oh maybe 2 weeks ago......that you could have a reasonable conversation with folk. Now they think it's a triumph to use the word 'salient'.

Edited by The_Kincardine
Link to comment
Share on other sites

All you did was regurgitate ridiculous old pap. Nothing that you said was interesting or original in any way None of you, "3 salient points" were either salient or even prescient. All you have done is rehash the tawdry old arguments from at least a year ago.

Learn how to fucking read what better posters have said before you make your "3 points", Salient Boy.

Tawdry old arguments from a year ago? You knew then that Green had a business undertaking called SEVCO 5088 with Whyte back then and yet you kept silent? You knew that Sir Charles of Green was aboots to lie to the SFA to obtain a licence?

You are Bomber in disguise and I claim the £5 prize.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And no quadruple either..............awwwww - will you be there cheering on the goys when they lift the small box of twiglets after Saturday's game?

You're trying too hard now claymores and it's making you look like a tit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tawdry old arguments from a year ago? You knew then that Green had a business undertaking called SEVCO 5088 with Whyte back then and yet you kept silent? You knew that Sir Charles of Green was aboots to lie to the SFA to obtain a licence?

You are Bomber in disguise and I claim the £5 prize.

Your are one wee angry man with little to offer but bombast.

May I suggest that getting to know Nat King may calm you down and take your focus off The Rangers? At least for 15 seconds?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your are one wee angry man with little to offer but bombast.

May I suggest that getting to know Nat King may calm you down and take your focus off The Rangers? At least for 15 seconds?

If you truly believe that and are not deflecting, then simply answer (from an objective viewpoint) whether Sevco's licence should be revoked/removed. It was obtained by deception as Green plainly lied when asked the straighforwards question "Has Craig Whyte been involved in any way with this acquisition"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you truly believe that and are not deflecting, then simply answer (from an objective viewpoint) whether Sevco's licence should be revoked/removed. It was obtained by deception as Green plainly lied when asked the straighforwards question "Has Craig Whyte been involved in any way with this acquisition"

Suspended at least until the in-house carpet treatment has been swept.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your are one wee angry man with little to offer but bombast.

May I suggest that getting to know Nat King may calm you down and take your focus off The Rangers? At least for 15 seconds?

If you truly believe that and are not deflecting, then simply answer (from an objective viewpoint) whether Sevco's licence should be revoked/removed. It was obtained by deception as Green plainly lied when asked the straighforwards question "Has Craig Whyte been involved in any way with this acquisition"

May I respectfully suggest that you are confusing your Nat King with your Dave King? One is rhyming slang and the other got fucked for £20M by Rangers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

May I respectfully suggest that you are confusing your Nat King with your Dave King? One is rhyming slang and the other got fucked for £20M by Rangers.

So you still won't venture an answer to question of obtaining a licence by deception should be punished? (which question is apparently over a year old you say despite the fact that Chuckles only told the lie last August and a year ago he and Whyte hadn't even formed SEVCO 5088 - you truly are Bomber)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So you still won't venture an answer to question of obtaining a licence by deception should be punished? (which question is apparently over a year old you say despite the fact that Chuckles only told the lie last August and a year ago he and Whyte hadn't even formed SEVCO 5088 - you truly are Bomber)

Yadadadadada. I will venture an answer when you tell us which King is most enticing to you. Tell us straight. Which King interests you more. Rhyming slang Nat or legal Dave?

I bet you can't answer me. What's more, I bet you haven't a fucking clue what I'm asking.

Mods, can we have better quality Plastic next time? This one broke too easily.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...