Jump to content

Big Rangers Administration/Liquidation Thread - All chat here!


Recommended Posts

, you cannot include income twice in 2 different set of accounts, don't be daft.

There has only been one set of accounts. Do you think this is like buses? Don't issue any for a few years then suddenly two in one year?

It was an interim Tedi, a fecking trading statement. NOT accounts........

It doesn't say that.

Aye WRK waaaaaaay ahead of you as normanl ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Aye WRK waaaaaaay ahead of you as normanl ;)

He isn't. It says 'SON of' followed by what may or may not be an 's'. How do you know he's not referring to his faither and so the megaphone is actually the property of 'Son of Sean'? You Ps&Ds just love making assumptions based on the flimsiest evidence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You still cannot just make stuff up in them, ffs don't be bloody daft.

anyway £26.3M in match day income to Dec 2013, proves you got this all entirely wrong, now as the WKR said, time for you to put the shovel down.

£26.3M in match day income

I was talking re season books, not pies, scarves, away ticket income walk ups and hospitality etc etc etc :)

If you had indeed raised that much, why are you skint? ('s ok, P+D's know this one)

This 'business review' Tedi.............. who supplied it? Is it binding? Or is it like the actual accounts and signed off with the caveat of being a going, lol, concern?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He isn't. It says 'SON of' followed by what may or may not be an 's'. How do you know he's not referring to his faither and so the megaphone is actually the property of 'Son of Sean'? You Ps&Ds just love making assumptions based on the flimsiest evidence.

^^^ Kincardine says Houston stole it from a cafflik :blink:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

^^^ Kincardine says Houston stole it from a cafflik :blink:

Only if you are sufficiently bigoted and small-minded to regard 'Sean' as a 'cafflick' name. I suspect you may be.

Edited to add: I am sure we had some Plastic ranging on here a year back because the people involved in some sort of Rangers enquiry all had what he called, "*** names". Note to Keith, I used the 'h' word as I was quoting rather than using a term of abuse.

Edited by The_Kincardine
Link to comment
Share on other sites

For a group of fans secure in their club's status and, as per their preferred slogan, disinterested in what anybody else thinks, these berrz spend an inordinate amount of time on here trying to convince, well somebody, that everything's going to be OK. :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For a group of fans secure in their club's status and, as per their preferred slogan, disinterested in what anybody else thinks, these berrz spend an inordinate amount of time on here trying to convince, well somebody, that everything's going to be OK. :lol:

Yup. That's half the thread. The other half is Ps&Ds pointing and laughing at us, Without either the thread would be useless. Now what's your point? or are you just doing your, 'stating the obvious' shite again? Maybe you're just waiting for another opportunity to spill your guts about how you were ritually abused by Rangers fans.

Edited by The_Kincardine
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you now trying to claim the £70.7M figure is not real, are you now trying to claim that the interim accounts for this year were just made up? documents released to the stock exchange....really is this what you are suggesting to try and dig yourself out of this hole you have dug?

Walk away wunf, or at least be a man and admit you made a cvnt of it.

just made up? documents released to the stock exchange

:)

The Directors are responsible for preparing the half-yearly financial report

^^ you tell me Tedi, are you backing 'The Directors'?

And yes, you do lie in documents released to the AIM.

Rangers Football Club, formed in Scotland in 1872, is one of the world's most successful clubs, having won 54 League titles, 33 Scottish Cups, 27 League Cups and the European Cup Winners' Cup in 1972. The Club's loyal and sizeable supporter base, both in Scotland and around the world, enables the Club to boast one of the highest percentages of season ticket holders in the UK, with over 38,000 having been sold for the current season. Playing at the 51,082 seater Ibrox Stadium and benefitting from the world class 37 acre Murray Park training facility, the Club has been a dominant force in Scottish football for decades. This world class stadium, training infrastructure and a loyal and passionate global fanbase provide an excellent foundation for the Rangers Group.

Currently the Club is competing in Division 3 of the SFL, though it is the intention of the Directors and the manager for the Club to return to top level football as soon as possible. The history, facilities and ambition of the Club are such that the Club remains a desirable destination for foreign and domestic players alike. The first team squad is managed by Ally McCoist, the former Rangers forward, who remains the Club's all-time leading goal scorer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Only if you are sufficiently bigoted and small-minded to regard 'Sean' as a 'cafflick' name. I suspect you may be.

Edited to add: I am sure we had some Plastic ranging on here a year back because the people involved in some sort of Rangers enquiry all had what he called, "*** names". Note to Keith, I used the 'h' word as I was quoting rather than using a term of abuse.

Sean isn't a cafflick name, but it is a cafflik spelling :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sean isn't a cafflick name, but it is a cafflik spelling :)

You are getting even more ridiculous.

? all my mates called thus in the 70's were spelled as 'Shawn' , 2 of them.

Folk I knew from 'across the road' were spelled as ''Sean''., more than 2 of them.

Sean/Shawn who gives a f**k. I have said many a time that the folk who raise religion as a topic on here are almost invariably Celtic fans. You are just confirming that. The rest of us care not whether Craig Houston's megaphone belonged to 'Son of Sean' or 'Son of Shawn' but you clearly do. Fuxake. He may even be, "Son of Sigourney Weaverr".

Nice to see your Plastic credentials laid bare: Assumption, conjecture with an admix of religious prejudice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hope none and as a true fan then I hope they find something on him that sees him done for fraud without further affecting the club, I would be a happy man to see both him and whyte behind bars for a very long time

In Rangers case it was Murray that ran up the debt, he then decided he no longer had the stomach for it and his personal wealth was also in a mess, look at how fucked MIM is, he sold to Whyte who was a crook and he commit ed fraud, the company went under

Fraud is a criminal offence, but this happened in the very later stages and only under Whytes tenure but he did not use the money he defrauded out of the taxman to increase the playing squad / quality at Ibrox he used it to line his pockets

Well we all know it was Whyte who was calling the shots, anybody that was going to go up against him at board level was punted, still I accept that anybody who was also in the know and stood idly by while fraud was carried out is just as guilty, but like any board there will have been members who had no idea what was going on

^^^ too easy Tedi, so you said multiple times that the folk at Ibrox committed fraud.

No I am not, however that does not mean I think they would lie to the stock exchange and submit false financials, that would be fraud.

But hey shift it onto the new club old club argument, that will get rid of your blunder.

And now you say they wouldn't :blink:

You get the clubs you deserve Tedi, it'll be like the VW Golf soon, and the MK3 was shoite.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

stick on for the pointless post of the year award.

I might be missing something, but I'm fairly sure that the sheer volume of brain farts emanating from this account of yours over the last few days will quite easily have the entire shortlist for that award easily sewn up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He isn't. It says 'SON of' followed by what may or may not be an 's'. How do you know he's not referring to his faither and so the megaphone is actually the property of 'Son of Sean'? You Ps&Ds just love making assumptions based on the flimsiest evidence.

Sean/Shawn who gives a f**k. I have said many a time that the folk who raise religion as a topic on here are almost invariably Celtic fans. You are just confirming that. The rest of us care not whether Craig Houston's megaphone belonged to 'Son of Sean' or 'Son of Shawn' but you clearly do. Fuxake. He may even be, "Son of Sigourney Weaverr".

Nice to see your Plastic credentials laid bare: Assumption, conjecture with an admix of religious prejudice.

Yep, you just did exactly that you Plastic Angle ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...