Jump to content

Big Rangers Administration/Liquidation Thread - All chat here!


Recommended Posts

No i can honestly say that i'm not ok with Densboy sneaking in sectarian phrases.

But it's fine for your mob to make posts on levels of bawbaggedness and below the belt comments hidden in paraphrasing is it not ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But it's fine for your mob to make posts on levels of bawbaggedness and below the belt comments hidden in paraphrasing is it not ?

I don't have a mob and if i did there would be no bawbagedness about it, it would be the best mob in the country.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Apparently we can no longer use 'Attilas' in jocular banter as it's considered a bypass to the swear filter for the word *** although I cannot see how it can possibly be connected to the particular and specific definition of *** used in the supposed derogatory and sectarian usage for Protestants.

It seems wee crying greeting faced Tedi has run to the mods again because the big boys poke fun at the diddums ... I can imagine his quivering lip as he typed his complaint ...

Do you have any complaints about Vandals Tedi ... or will that set the tear ducts in motion as well, ya greetin faced hoor?

Visigoths.

go for it chaps...

wait for the 'that's a sectarian term, that is and that jist pyuir disgraceful and at'

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It seemed that for a few years that particular website had been lying to everyone and when their lies were found out, they simply changed their name and deleted their lies.

Well that's just a load of shite. :lol:

Was the RTC website lying when it attempted to warn Rangers fans about their new hero?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Come on Tedi ... ya fat liar we're waiting.

Meltdown material from the five star chump Dhenny.

My nephew is a die hard Rangers supporter and he is Catholic but still uses all the usual Rangers pish agenda towards me, should I be insulted by the bigot or just laugh at him because he is obviously doing it for a rise and a laugh from me ?

I am neither Protestant or Catholic and I'm the first of my whole family not be of a religious persuasion from birth, should I be considered a bigot using such language towards both sets of fans ?

So many questions :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Explain to everyone how a Protestant insulting a Gers fan is a bigot and the use of the H word is sectarian ... you clown.

I'm just going to wait for him to try and explain how a Protestant using the term makes it sectarian, never mind the two clowns posting a gif on the Livi thread with H word in full view.

Proddie calls Proddie a c**t in sectarian shocker outrage !!!

Densboy please keep religion out of this and let it go man.

Come on Tedi ... ya fat liar we're waiting.

Oh oh he's getting angry now, it'll be an offer of a square go next lol

Edited by bennett
Link to comment
Share on other sites

They did delete an enormous amount of material when the tax case was lost.

Why on earth would they do this if it was all true?

That was around the time you were deleting an enormous amount of your own posts then Tedi ?, now why on Earth would you have done that ? :1eye

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They did delete an enormous amount of material when the tax case was lost.

Why on earth would they do this if it was all true?

Scared of litigation from Murray I'd hazard a guess as they did appear to be in possession of some sensitive information.

Sure it must have all been screen grabbed in this day and age though? Was a bit bizarre.

No doubt he got the raison d’etre of his blog wrong, but that doesn't mean he was "lying" about everything on his blog. He was still one of the first people to call out Whyte for what he was when the MSM was fluffing the rangers fans into a frenzy over the MBB with wealth off the radar.

I always found that blog relatively neutral and objective, albeit misguided, as it turned out. I agree with you about the the "monitor" website though, I used to post on there occasionally but gave up after too many run in's with idiotic Celtc fans.

Edited by AberdeenBud
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok, I agree on the everything part, he did call it right on a few things but I imagine a fair few of those things were 'lucky guesses' the problem with luck is that sooner or later it runs out, he found that out and his credibility was ruined overnight. If he genuinely was scared of Murray litigation then he must have good reason but I am still not ruling out deleting everything in a blind rage, he must have been positively beeling about the outcome.

No doubt, he seemed genuinely convinced which way the BTC was going and managed to convince a lot of other people, myself included.

I think there was some posts left up though that didn't directly relate to the BTC, which makes me think it may have been more to do with potential litigation. Although as I said not exactly hard nowadays to recover this information I would've thought so it could have been done in a fit of pique. I suppose we'll never know.

Probably not a popular point of view amongst Bears but I still think that blog deserves a little credit for bringing some of the murkier goings on at Rangers, the SFA and the scottish MSM to a wider audience.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok, I agree on the everything part, he did call it right on a few things but I imagine a fair few of those things were 'lucky guesses' the problem with luck is that sooner or later it runs out, he found that out and his credibility was ruined overnight. If he genuinely was scared of Murray litigation then he must have good reason but I am still not ruling out deleting everything in a blind rage, he must have been positively beeling about the outcome.

If only you had some credibility to be ruined. :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No doubt, he seemed genuinely convinced which way the BTC was going and managed to convince a lot of other people, myself included.

I think there was some posts left up though that didn't directly relate to the BTC, which makes me think it may have been more to do with potential litigation. Although as I said not exactly hard nowadays to recover this information I would've thought so it could have been done in a fit of pique. I suppose we'll never know.

Probably not a popular point of view amongst Bears but I still think that blog deserves a little credit for bringing some of the murkier goings on at Rangers, the SFA and the scottish MSM to a wider audience.

Corporate bullies and their highly paid lawyers can just about get anything pulled from the web, even such content that isn't true but may harm the corporations public image in a certain manner. So anything related to Rangers FC in any way shape or form can be deemed as a malicious attack on the corporate companies image and would have been put into the same bag as truth and non truth/lie regardless to be pulled. So there could and probably was truths removed along with the non truths/lies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...