Jacksgranda Posted December 28, 2014 Share Posted December 28, 2014 (edited) Banny are always this glaikit? edit - got caught between Benny and Fanny. I'll just leave it. NSFW forum for that lewd pish... Edited December 28, 2014 by Jacksgranda 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G-MAN Posted December 28, 2014 Share Posted December 28, 2014 Ohhhh Derek McInnes Ohhhh Derek McInnes ARMAGEDDON!!!!!! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tim Malloy Posted December 28, 2014 Share Posted December 28, 2014 (edited) I see in the Sunday Post Lewis MacLeod has been linked with a move to Brentford. Burnley also linked. Not to worry! Barca,Chelski and Bayern are just poised to swoop for MacLeodinho. The next great hope if the SMSM are to be believed. Not like that biased lot to make a royal erse of it, eh? Edited December 28, 2014 by Tim Malloy 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Koop Posted December 28, 2014 Share Posted December 28, 2014 Banny are always this glaikit? edit - got caught between Benny and Fanny. I'll just leave it. Kinky stuff. Can't beat it. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted December 28, 2014 Share Posted December 28, 2014 Kinky stuff. Can't beat it. Ahem, you can you know, big boy I love a man with a prodigious Rights Issue. Get this forthcoming share offering underwritten and you could be the very Partick hunk who truly gets his whistle blown Kinky enough for you?? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henrik's tongue Posted December 28, 2014 Share Posted December 28, 2014 Makes little difference who comes in, the club that would like to sign Lewis MacLeod will try to attain him for as little as possible. As far as I'm aware the highest club that look to be interested are Everton. Great being Evertons feeder club, innit? We're Southamptons. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~~~ Posted December 28, 2014 Share Posted December 28, 2014 So the latest rumours are Sevco are paying the well known bigoted kitman £110k a year 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tim Malloy Posted December 28, 2014 Share Posted December 28, 2014 no8 will be delighted, according to him Everton are a loyalist club. That's just desperation from No. 8. Everton must have been the only winner he had on his coupon that day. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dublinarab Posted December 28, 2014 Share Posted December 28, 2014 Everton also had an affiliate club in Dublin for many years - once called Everton, now Home Farm. Not drawing from a masive unionist population in north Dublin! They may well have 'unionists' amongst their support - given that most English people support the union that is hardly surprising. I don't think that makes them a 'loyalist' club though. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nipper Posted December 29, 2014 Share Posted December 29, 2014 (edited) So because both teams have large Irish followings Everton don't have a loyalist section that follows them. Looks like my Scouser friend who actually lived in Liverpool and mixed with such people is proven wrong.The notion that Everton had or has a large loyalist following is absolute nonsense since Everton historically were the team in Liverpool that had the biggest Catholic support in the city. The lines became blurred in the 1960's with Liverpool's steady rise to greatness. The fact that Everton play in blue and Liverpool sing " you'll never walk alone"no doubt confuses people up here. It does seem strange given their backgrounds that Celtic fans feel a connection with Liverpool and Rangers have had a fairly long association with Everton, ironic really. Edited December 29, 2014 by Nipper 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raidernation Posted December 29, 2014 Share Posted December 29, 2014 Also there's the Liverpool/Celtic/Victim F C connection 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stonedsailor Posted December 29, 2014 Share Posted December 29, 2014 The notion that Everton had or has a large loyalist following is absolute nonsense since Everton historically were the team in Liverpool that had the biggest Catholic support in the city. The lines became blurred in the 1960's with Liverpool's steady rise to greatness. The fact that Everton play in blue and Liverpool sing " you'll never walk alone"no doubt confuses people up here. It does seem strange given their backgrounds that Celtic fans feel a connection with Liverpool and Rangers have had a fairly long association with Everton, ironic really. Does Everton's not also have a chapel within it's structure? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
No8. Posted December 29, 2014 Share Posted December 29, 2014 Does Everton's not also have a chapel within it's structure? No. There is a pretty decent Flute Band with Everton in their name. I don't remember ever saying Everton were a Loyalist club but within the Loyalist community of Liverpool they are the team most of them follow. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H Wragg Posted December 29, 2014 Share Posted December 29, 2014 If McDowall has 'reluctantly' taken charge of the first team why doesn't he tell the board he's changed his mind, given that in addition to McCoist being placed on gardening leave the other part of their 3 man team has now been reduced to running the under 20's then barred from the club for a period of time? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H Wragg Posted December 29, 2014 Share Posted December 29, 2014 Refusing to do your duties can lead to him being dismissed ... whether or not the club want rid of him is debatable. They are trying to get of Durrant it seems. It maybe short term until they can free up wages for a manager to step in ... Who knows. Shortage of cash and McCoist's willingness to bleed dry the 'club' he professes to love is highly entertaining though. He's employed to be assistant manager. I'd imagine that means he can't be forced to take what is in effect a promotion. If they wanted rid if he declined to play the game he'd surely have to be paid his money? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted December 29, 2014 Share Posted December 29, 2014 (edited) Jackson still twittering on about Rangers' mess casting a shadow across the Scottish game I see, before he goes on to dismantle his own case by proving that it's really only Celtic that have been adversely affected. I also enjoyed his suggestion that difficulties only began with Whyte, thus ignoring that only the ridiculous, suicidal management of Murray and friends, allowed him to get anywhere near the place. Edited December 29, 2014 by Monkey Tennis 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
No8. Posted December 29, 2014 Share Posted December 29, 2014 If McDowall has 'reluctantly' taken charge of the first team why doesn't he tell the board he's changed his mind Money. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
No8. Posted December 29, 2014 Share Posted December 29, 2014 I also enjoyed his suggestion that difficulties only began with Whyte, thus ignoring that only the ridiculous, suicidal management of Murray and friends, allowed him to get anywhere near the place. Only the HMRC tax bill kept others from investing in 2012. Rangers bank debt had been halved to under £18 million when Murray was forced to sell. That debt was easily manageable if the right people had been able to invest. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H Wragg Posted December 29, 2014 Share Posted December 29, 2014 Money.In what sense?He wants more or he doesn't want to lose what he already has? If it's the latter, see my post above. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted December 29, 2014 Share Posted December 29, 2014 Only the HMRC tax bill kept others from investing in 2012. Rangers bank debt had been halved to under £18 million when Murray was forced to sell. That debt was easily manageable if the right people had been able to invest. And that HMRC tax bill had nothing to do with those in charge of the club then? Please don't answer by telling me the verdict reached on it. I already know it and it changes nothing regarding the suicidal running of the club under Murray. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.