Jump to content

Big Rangers Administration/Liquidation Thread - All chat here!


Recommended Posts

A few years at the height of 9IAR perhaps but quite a few of them were close.

30 years before Rangers were not in the top division takes us back to 81/82

3 seasons it was won by an non OF team

22 Seasons it was won by less than 10 points

14 Seasons the both of the OF did not even finish in the top 2

Basically you are talking out of your arse.

If we take the 9 in a row as the starting point, I would say that 5 of the 9 you would have predicted with confidence and got right. 2 at the start when Aberdeen challenged and 2 at the end when Celtic challenged being the exception.

Advocaat's first 2 seasons were a gimme.

O'Neill's 2nd and 3rd titles you would have confidently predicted.

Strachans 2nd title you'd have predicted.

Smiths 2nd and 3rd title in his second spell you would have predicted before hand and got right.

The last 3 for Celtic you'd have predicted.

Taking 88-89 as the starting point, you could confidently have predicted 16 of the 25 titles.

That ignores the fact that for everyone outside of those who follow Celtic or Rangers, it was a forgone conclusion in all 25 seasons.

Edited by Ross.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That ignores the fact that for everyone outside of those who follow Celtic or Rangers, it was a forgone conclusion in all 25 seasons.

This being the crucial point that Sevticonians seem utterly incapable of grasping. Nobody cares which of them wins.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you never get tired of repeating other peoples lies? Why engage with people if you are just going to talk rubbish, you could ignore them and at least give the impression that you believe your club didn't die? As is the lady doth protest too much.

What lies would this be then. Is the continuity recognised, i'll help you out here, yes it is, so can you inform me where are the lies in that stated, please.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What lies would this be then. Is the continuity recognised, i'll help you out here, yes it is, so can you inform me where are the lies in that stated, please.

Oh, the continuity is recognised by those who it suits to recognise it. As with religions, conspiracy theorists and other associated nutjobs, that doesn't make it fact.

The only (afaia) time there has been any kind of challenge in law over the continuity was in the case of employee contracts under TUPE. Remind us how that one panned out?

Edited by WhiteRoseKillie
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We've done that but as you're going to be pedantic, ok then a company that runs a football club. Happy now.

Abso-fucking-lutely. My club didn't die, you see. Still the oldest professional club in Scotland, and still playing topflight football. We even won at the weekend. What's not to like?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What lies would this be then. Is the continuity recognised, i'll help you out here, yes it is, so can you inform me where are the lies in that stated, please.

Actually it was the "the man that you class as a hero," bit. As has been explained many times it was rangers fans that hailed his heroic arrival, that p's and d's now refer to him as such is to wind up those idiots.

As for the "is the continuity recognised?" rubbish. If I told you a cork notice board was an LG TV would you buy it off me for £300?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You will for the next ten years though.

You're even more optimistic than i am. I think you have to give the New Board time to bed in though then after next season i fully expect Rangers to win every league title for 3 or 4 years...10 is pushing it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can't believe they're still clinging onto the myth "it's the same club"

I've always wonder why if it's so easy to separate the club and company, why didn't Craig Whyte simply offer to buy the "club" without the company

Same with Bill Miller, should have easily bought the club without the debt ridden company.

Even Charlie Green said in his early days it would be the death of the club if the CVA failed and it went into liquidation.

I can't even recall anyone in the media prior to liquidation mentioning it was possible to purchase the club on its own without the company.

I do remember after the CVA failed all media outlets reporting it was the death of Rangers, did they just all just make a mistake? It's as if everyone involved forgot you could buy the club without the company..... Until Charlie bought the Woolworth assists. Sorry I mean Rangers

Anyone want to answer my above points please.

Surely it's an easy one for you to answer without much effort involved

Edited by Enrico Annoni
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're even more optimistic than i am. I think you have to give the New Board time to bed in though then after next season i fully expect Rangers to win every league title for 3 or 4 years...10 is pushing it

Aye but you're fucking mental. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...