Jump to content

Big Rangers Administration/Liquidation Thread - All chat here!


Recommended Posts

@dmccarthyDR: SFA hearing with Mike Ashley lawyers has ended after almost five hours...no decision tonight on whether he has undue influence over RFC...

This has to be some kind of a joke right, only a complete and utter moron would suggest that he has not been influencing matters at Ibrox, are a billionaires lawyers really that scary?

Oh Tedi!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@dmccarthyDR: SFA hearing with Mike Ashley lawyers has ended after almost five hours...no decision tonight on whether he has undue influence over RFC...

This has to be some kind of a joke right, only a complete and utter moron would suggest that he has not been influencing matters at Ibrox, are a billionaires lawyers really that scary?

Glorious seethe type post^^^

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear reader he still doesn't get the fact that the SFA can be held accountable for regulation or rules that impede on his lawful rights to conduct lawful investments and commercial business transactions with companies.

You really know your stuff....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your ignorance of the language is amazing. 'IF' sets the conditions for the rest of the opinion offered. King will not pay the loan back and has stated as much publicly ... The sheer stupidity of the *** comes as no surprise.

Uh-huh, the word also denotes that, like everything else you post on this thread, is nothing but guessing and speculation, in other words, you know nothing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This has to be some kind of a joke right, only a complete and utter moron would suggest that he has not been influencing matters at Ibrox

Ken - It's on a par with suggesting that having players they wouldn't otherwise have been able to afford wasn't an advantage to Rangers on the pitch :wacko:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ken - It's on a par with suggesting that having players they wouldn't otherwise have been able to afford wasn't an advantage to Rangers on the pitch :wacko:

Or that it's possible to deliberately undermine the existing board in a manner that isn't aimed at lowering the share price for a cheaper purchase.

I feel for the SFA, I really do. They don't know which arse to kiss - they're not the Sun or the Daily Record, they can't just turn on a sixpence and claim that they always backed whoever eventually wins. If they pick the wrong one, they might end up facing the consequences of that for years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Proactive ffs.

What part was shite...if you influence the price in shares then buy them up for cheaper it is illegal.

All Rangers fans are guessing and hoping. Apart from you and Tedi.

Really? I'd like you to show a post from myself stating that getting King and the rest in is a guarantee to success. Every Rangers fan of my acquaintance is of the opinion that we have a long way to go and nothing is being taken for granted. Never mind though, you just carry on with posting nonsense as per usual.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...