The_Kincardine Posted September 10, 2015 Share Posted September 10, 2015 If you don't know after 2 years, how is my opinion on the matter going to persuade you Well state is again, Acne. Is a club's existence coterminous with its company registration number? Yes or no? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stonedsailor Posted September 10, 2015 Share Posted September 10, 2015 Aside from your apostrophe abuse that's an equally valid Q. I know. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted September 10, 2015 Share Posted September 10, 2015 Looks like the BBC have finally stopped listening to Gollum and Wee Jum http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/34211117 'After agreement could not be reached with creditors, the company moved into liquidation while the club moved into new ownership and were subsequently placed in the Scottish Third Division - the league's lowest tier - at the start of season 2012-13.'[/size] Ally is off the wage budget too[/size] Succulent churnalism apparently. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted September 10, 2015 Share Posted September 10, 2015 Rubbish, everyone knows Rangers were relegated down to the 3rd and the BBC are on the list of enemies of Rangers. They weren't. Doh! Sorry, my bad 1st Division, Stewart Regan said so. I'm going to get grumpy now. You have spent lots of time on The Big Thread and are coming out with this 'relegated' pash. The process was different. We forfeited our SPL share and applied for SFL membership and were admitted to the then SFL's 3rd tier. I'm amazed that someone who posts as much about Rangers as you shows such ignorance. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adundeemonkey Posted September 10, 2015 Share Posted September 10, 2015 In 2012, the Newco was refused entry into the SPL. This was decided by a vote by the 12 existing member CLUBs. It was the CLUBs that owned an SPL share as stated in the SPL rules. One of these CLUBs was Rangers, the CLUB that competed that previous season as a member and shareholder of the SPL. This is the only evidence that is needed to prove that the current tribute act is not the old club. This is incontrovertible unless Rangers fans are trying to say that one club can actually be two clubs at the same time? Here is a reminder that Rangers voted in that vote. http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/18703183 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ranaldo Bairn Posted September 10, 2015 Share Posted September 10, 2015 I'm gonna go out on a limb here and state that I think snafu was not entirely serious. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE KING Posted September 10, 2015 Share Posted September 10, 2015 Lest we forget..."The club will now be liquidated" .. The creditors of Rangers have formally rejected a CVA proposal which would have allowed the club to trade its way out of administration. The decision was taken during a meeting at Ibrox stadium on Thursday, which lasted just nine minutes. Rangers' largest creditor, HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC), said on Tuesday it would reject the CVA plan worth £8.5m. The club will now be liquidated and its assets sold to a new company which will aim to continue with football at Ibrox. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted September 10, 2015 Share Posted September 10, 2015 I'm gonna go out on a limb here and state that I think snafu was not entirely serious. I shall happily backtrack and almost agree with you. I could almost admit to being whooshed. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted September 10, 2015 Share Posted September 10, 2015 Heh heh , they're still desperately trying to prove its not the same club, isn't about time that some chump mentioned the Edinburgh gazette? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aofjays Posted September 10, 2015 Share Posted September 10, 2015 In 2012, the Newco was refused entry into the SPL. This was decided by a vote by the 12 existing member CLUBs. It was the CLUBs that owned an SPL share as stated in the SPL rules. One of these CLUBs was Rangers, the CLUB that competed that previous season as a member and shareholder of the SPL. This is the only evidence that is needed to prove that the current tribute act is not the old club. This is incontrovertible unless Rangers fans are trying to say that one club can actually be two clubs at the same time? Here is a reminder that Rangers voted in that vote. http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/18703183 Heh heh , they're still desperately trying to prove its not the same club, isn't about time that some chump mentioned the Edinburgh gazette? Heh heh, sad bears still desperately trying to troll the board by ignoring simple facts. Isn't about time some chump mentioned adverts? -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted September 10, 2015 Share Posted September 10, 2015 (edited) Hands up all those who believe that a club's existence is inextricably linked to its company registration? Is an association football club's existence coterminous with it's membership of an association? So let's blend Stoney's post with mine: 1. Is a club's existence inextricably linked to its company registration? 2. Is a club's existence coterminous with its membership of an association? I'll give this a shot: 1. Clearly not. Many clubs have existed and are acknowledged without a company registration. 2. No.clubs predate, and exist outwith, an association. Answers on a postcard. Edited September 10, 2015 by The_Kincardine 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kiddy Posted September 10, 2015 Share Posted September 10, 2015 (edited) I see Jim Traynor, & his unfeasibly large wi-fi system, is still skulking about Ibrokes! :lol: Edited September 10, 2015 by kiddy 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave.j Posted September 10, 2015 Share Posted September 10, 2015 The Berz, still going on about old club new club, it must really get to them. Anything to deflect discussion, I suppose. -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stonedsailor Posted September 10, 2015 Share Posted September 10, 2015 (edited) Is an association football club's existence coterminous with it's membership of an association? So let's blend Stoney's post with mine: 1. Is a club's existence inextricably linked to its company registration? 2. Is a club's existence coterminous with it's membership of an association? I'll give this a shot: 1. Clearly not. Many clubs have existed and are acknowledged without a company registration. 2. No.clubs predate, and exist outwith, an association. Answers on a postcard. You deliberately misquoted my question. The context has been altered to force your erroneous answer.Also. Please limit your answer to yes or no per original limitations. Edited September 10, 2015 by stonedsailor 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted September 10, 2015 Share Posted September 10, 2015 You deliberately misquoted my question. The context has been altered to force your erroneous answer. Also. Please limit your answer to yes or no per original limitations. That wasn't my intention: Let me recast: 1. Is a club's existence inextricably linked to its company registration? No. 2. Is an association football club's existence coterminous with it's membership of an association? No Happier? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stonedsailor Posted September 10, 2015 Share Posted September 10, 2015 (edited) That wasn't my intention: Let me recast: 1. Is a club's existence inextricably linked to its company registration? No. 2. Is an association football club's existence coterminous with it's membership of an association? No Happier? How can a club be an association football club if it is not aligned, by membership, to an association of clubs?It is just a football club with no membership to an association. Edited September 10, 2015 by stonedsailor 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted September 10, 2015 Share Posted September 10, 2015 Have you read Uncle Phil's latest blog recently?. http://www.philmacgiollabhain.ie/the-problems-of-an-underfunded-hostile-takeover/ According to Phil's sources Rangers, the operation only has enough sustainable capital for little more than a month. The Rangers board begging Super Ally to do the decent thing and settle. LOL A month eh? he used to always give us between a few days and a week. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted September 10, 2015 Share Posted September 10, 2015 How can a club be an association football club if it is not aligned, by membership, to an association of clubs? Tell Queens Park that their existence is coterminous with The SFA's. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted September 10, 2015 Share Posted September 10, 2015 Maybe he's losing interest??. Has he ever blogged about celtic? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
strichener Posted September 10, 2015 Share Posted September 10, 2015 Tell Queens Park that their existence is coterminous with The SFA's. The more you use the word, the more convinced I am that you don't know what it means. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.