Ned Nederlander Posted October 11, 2015 Share Posted October 11, 2015 chinks Racist. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted October 11, 2015 Share Posted October 11, 2015 (edited) I'm not clutching a straw Ted. I don't like Leeds either. It was just that someone asked about TUPE earlier and it seemed like an interesting question in pursuing this idea of parallels between the clubs' circumstances. Back in the day Ted, you'd have considered it, but then you used to be a better poster. Edited October 11, 2015 by Monkey Tennis 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteRoseKillie Posted October 11, 2015 Share Posted October 11, 2015 "As long as it's being played by the old club". Keep lobbing those hand grenades, Tedi. -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted October 11, 2015 Share Posted October 11, 2015 Densboy being a tad obvious there.... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted October 11, 2015 Share Posted October 11, 2015 Seems the Charlotte fakes account and Paul Murray account are one in the same?Ye think... [url=http://scotslawthoughts.wordpress.com/2013/09/28/. Stating the possible motives behind Charlotte Fakes. Was it to extort money from people? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE KING Posted October 11, 2015 Share Posted October 11, 2015 Anyone got a date Rangers came out of administration? Ive seen Leeds 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted October 11, 2015 Share Posted October 11, 2015 I would consider discussing something that did not interest me? really, I think that is bullcrap to be honest but then you have always been a bullcrap poster, do not think I have ever pretended otherwise. Not true Ted. I remember you saying some very nice things about me back in the early days - complimenting me on my respectful tone while hoping you'd always returned the favour and all sorts. Touching stuff It was Ted. Are you still actually claiming that the details of the Leeds process don't interest you Ted, because that would be extraordinary? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted October 11, 2015 Share Posted October 11, 2015 (edited) Now why would the mainstream media ignore the Charlotte Fakes blogs? . The dreaded SMSM up to no good again? Edited October 11, 2015 by bennett 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeyWellFan Posted October 11, 2015 Share Posted October 11, 2015 It's all about The Leeds. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~~~ Posted October 11, 2015 Share Posted October 11, 2015 So, I'll ask again Why does Dave King want to bring the "traditional" Rangers out of liquidation? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ken Fitlike Posted October 11, 2015 Share Posted October 11, 2015 Did the old Leeds have a vote in which division the new Leeds would be placed in? -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacksgranda Posted October 11, 2015 Share Posted October 11, 2015 Did the Leeds players TUPE? Is there an echo in here (here)? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mythstoliveby Posted October 11, 2015 Share Posted October 11, 2015 of course ...Goa Is it not past your bedtime?? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ranaldo Bairn Posted October 11, 2015 Share Posted October 11, 2015 Compulsory or voluntary liquidation is meaningless, apart from the liquidation bit. They're both new clubs, that's clear. If a foreign FA recognises a foreign club as continuous when it's not, that's up to them. I have three guinea pigs. If I recognise them as horses, or when they die, name their replacements the same as them, that's up to me. Doesn't make it the same piggies. Sevco possess Rangers' bibs n cones. My next piggies will possess the extant ones' hutch. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Insaintee Posted October 11, 2015 Share Posted October 11, 2015 The Leeds liquidation scenario interest me because it shows a glaring hole in the 'Rangers are a new club and no other club has survived liquidation' nonsense. Leeds clearly did, what makes it even more bizarre was a number of posters including yourself accepted this scenario was a possibility way back in April 2012, funnily enough nobody was speaking about players back then either....to be honest I am not sure why you are mentioning it now, I can only assume it is some sort of straw you are trying to clutch. and the 'you used to me a better poster line' ..........cringe....a line which you have used all over this forum against numerous posters, we have been through this before, everyone sees through it. When it comes to the players I did find this, it was released 12th July, the day after the sale of the 'business and assets' was agreed but before the transfer of memberships was finalised. The FA gives Leeds the all-clear to play York in a pre-season friendly tonight after being given certain assurances. An FA spokesman tells PA Sport: "We are happy for the game to go ahead as long as it's being played by the old club - Leeds United in administration. As long as players and trialists are registered to the old entity we have no objections." It certainly suggests that a transfer of player registrations was about to get underway and that the FA were making sure it had no happened yet. Edit it again and see if you can make it right. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Insaintee Posted October 11, 2015 Share Posted October 11, 2015 Compulsory or voluntary liquidation is meaningless, apart from the liquidation bit. They're both new clubs, that's clear. If a foreign FA recognises a foreign club as continuous when it's not, that's up to them. I have three guinea pigs. If I recognise them as horses, or when they die, name their replacements the same as them, that's up to me. Doesn't make it the same piggies. Sevco possess Rangers' bibs n cones. My next piggies will possess the extant ones' hutch. What are their names? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Insaintee Posted October 11, 2015 Share Posted October 11, 2015 Is there an echo in here (here)? Just in your head 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ranaldo Bairn Posted October 11, 2015 Share Posted October 11, 2015 SuperSam, Crunchie and Wee Russell# #not really* *the wife wouldn't let me. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ken Fitlike Posted October 12, 2015 Share Posted October 12, 2015 (edited) I would consider discussing something that did not interest me? really, I think that is bullcrap to be honest but then you have always been a bullcrap poster, do not think I have ever pretended otherwise. (translation) of course I'm not going to discuss the TUPE aspect of it because I know that the players who stayed on at Ibrox transferred their contracts between the old club and the new club therefore proving that it is not the same club. That is why it 'does not interest me'. No matter how much I dance around with comparisons to similar (but different) situations, there is no getting away from the fact that Rangers 1973 1873 died. And I can't handle it......... EDIT - wrong century. easily done on a Rangers / 'Rangers' thread. Edited October 12, 2015 by Ken Fitlike -2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteRoseKillie Posted October 12, 2015 Share Posted October 12, 2015 (translation) of course I'm not going to discuss the TUPE aspect of it because I know that the players who stayed on at Ibrox transferred their contracts between the old club and the new club therefore proving that it is not the same club. That is why it 'does not interest me'. No matter how much I dance around with comparisons to similar (but different) situations, there is no getting away from the fact that Rangers 1973 died. And I can't handle it......... Very succinct, Ken. Tedi is the epitome of the berrz who will bang on about perceived similarities until the cows come home while dismissing differences as irrelevant. Season with a lack of self-awareness and add a soupçon of desperation, and they're comedy gold. -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.