nacho Posted October 13, 2015 Share Posted October 13, 2015 From the same website...... .The Scottish FA issued a guidance note, based on legal advice and without prejudice, to both Rangers FC and PFA Scotland. Certain players have now chosen not to transfer across under TUPE regulations and, instead, agreed contracts elsewhere. On a procedural basis, the Scottish FA cannot process an International Transfer Certificate via FIFA’s Transfer Management System where there is an ongoing contractual dispute. Rangers FC have confirmed that there is such a contractual dispute. In the meantime, the new club(s) can request a temporary transfer from FIFA in order that the player(s) is free to play while the dispute process unfolds. This process has commenced in relation to a number of the players in question. ......new club read that again and have a wee think about what it means - clue the new clubs are something to do with the players and have nothing to do with rangers who are mentioned by name numerous times in the paragraph 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nacho Posted October 13, 2015 Share Posted October 13, 2015 FTFY. Oh, and if you call someone a dumbass (woo! Spring Break! Woo!!), you'd better at least refer to the correct competition. I blame the Mordorian education system. i am referrring to the correct competition, rangers are the same club, the rules were clarified at the time and have nothing to do with the clubs status, everyone credible who has commented says we are the same club, you have nothing backing up your new club pish and you are a dumbass due to the level of your argument - come up with a decent logical non strawman argument why you think rangers are a new club backed up with some evidence and i will treat you with some respect , dumbass -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aofjays Posted October 13, 2015 Share Posted October 13, 2015 i am referrring to the correct competition, rangers are the same club, the rules were clarified at the time and have nothing to do with the clubs status, everyone credible who has commented says we are the same club, you have nothing backing up your new club pish and you are a dumbass due to the level of your argument - come up with a decent logical non strawman argument why you think rangers are a new club backed up with some evidence and i will treat you with some respect , dumbass OT but since you seem in a loquacious mood, maybe you can answer this question, it's been puzzling me for some time and I can't get any (new) rangers fans to comment on it. How do you reconcile the old club voting in favour of allowing your new club to become a SPL member club? Only clubs can be members and only clubs have voting rights. Since there are obviously two clubs here do you just pretend it didn't happen? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ranaldo Bairn Posted October 13, 2015 Share Posted October 13, 2015 In the name of the wee man, the poster above referred to the LEAGUE CUP. You started wittering on about the SCOTTISH CUP. I've posted this several times, but since you're extremely stupid new here, here we go again. Rangers were formed in about 1873. In 1899 they incorporated into a company. That means they became one. They were not bought by anyone at that stage. They were bought later, eventually by the Murray Group. This was their 'holding company'. When Rangers went bust, a new club was formed. They were called Sevco Scotland, and were also a company. The two are not mutually exclusive you see? They bought Rangers' bibs n cones, and the right to ply their trade at Ibrox. Anyway, they changed their name to The Rangers. There was a vote to see where they should get placed in the league system. Old Rangers voted they should start in the SPL. This is the club you now support, and their holding company is Rangers International. This is who all the looyalllll berrrrzzz bought shares in a couple of years ago. It's all extremely simple. If it's causing you problems, please refer to every single fucking journalist AND RANGERS FAN before summer 2012, who stated quite explicitly that liquidation meant the death of Rangers 1873. Even Charles Green, who gave you a club to support! Or continue your amoeba-brained self-deception. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Insaintee Posted October 13, 2015 Share Posted October 13, 2015 Wrong and Wrong...Rangers never gave any loans to players. Good news for HMRC hope you'll testify 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE KING Posted October 13, 2015 Share Posted October 13, 2015 yawwn - were all the third divison teams new then dumbass? heres what was said at the time “Under the Scottish FA’s Cup Competition Rules, Rangers FC as a third division club will join the William Hill Scottish Cup at the second round.” This was clarified after Rangers were put in division 3 to remove the confusion over this, as there were two conflicting rules, neither of which had any bearing on whether Rangers were a new club added to that the organisations that make the rules have stated unequivocally that we are the same club The spelling, the grammar....must be Forever_ontheglue. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE KING Posted October 13, 2015 Share Posted October 13, 2015 i am referrring to the correct competition, rangers are the same club, the rules were clarified at the time and have nothing to do with the clubs status, everyone credible who has commented says we are the same club, you have nothing backing up your new club pish and you are a dumbass due to the level of your argument - come up with a decent logical non strawman argument why you think rangers are a new club backed up with some evidence and i will treat you with some respect , dumbass Why did this same club have to rejoin the league? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
strichener Posted October 13, 2015 Share Posted October 13, 2015 i am referrring to the correct competition, rangers are the same club, the rules were clarified at the time and have nothing to do with the clubs status, everyone credible who has commented says we are the same club, you have nothing backing up your new club pish and you are a dumbass due to the level of your argument - come up with a decent logical non strawman argument why you think rangers are a new club backed up with some evidence and i will treat you with some respect , dumbass Rangers International Football Club plc is a football club based in Glasgow, Scotland. ... The Company is incorporated in Scotland with registration number SC 437060 and its main country of operation is Scotland. From Companies House Name & Registered Office: RANGERS INTERNATIONAL FOOTBALL CLUB PLC IBROX STADIUM 150 EDMISTON DRIVE GLASGOW G51 2XD Company No. SC437060 Status: Active Date of Incorporation: 16/11/2012 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G-MAN Posted October 13, 2015 Share Posted October 13, 2015 yawwn - were all the third divison teams new then dumbass? heres what was said at the time “Under the Scottish FA’s Cup Competition Rules, Rangers FC as a third division club will join the William Hill Scottish Cup at the second round.” This was clarified after Rangers were put in division 3 to remove the confusion over this, as there were two conflicting rules, neither of which had any bearing on whether Rangers were a new club added to that the organisations that make the rules have stated unequivocally that we are the same club Those in the organisations are scared to say otherwise..DUMBASS, dont you get it. We all know the TRUTH, but there will be those in power to scared to admit it. "Who are these people, we demand to know their names" etc etc etc The Establishment Club remember. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joey Jo Jo Junior Shabadoo Posted October 13, 2015 Share Posted October 13, 2015 OT but since you seem in a loquacious mood, maybe you can answer this question, it's been puzzling me for some time and I can't get any (new) rangers fans to comment on it. How do you reconcile the old club voting in favour of allowing your new club to become a SPL member club? Only clubs can be members and only clubs have voting rights. Since there are obviously two clubs here do you just pretend it didn't happen? D&P were experts in quantum mechanics, so I assume they will tell you that the same thing can exist in different places at the same time. I look forward to Dr Jim Al Kahlili's explanation of Scottish Football's Armageddon. Coming soon on BBC4, I'm sure. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
strichener Posted October 13, 2015 Share Posted October 13, 2015 (edited) From the SPFL A very happy James Tavernier from the same game Aye very good. I am not really sure what the results against Peterhead has to do with anything but carry on if it makes you feel all superior. Perhaps you can explain why you think that the SPFL website has more veracity than your own. Do you not trust the information they distribute? How about you look up the SPFL in companies house. You will be able to see what continuation looks like.... Edited October 13, 2015 by strichener 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kiddy Posted October 13, 2015 Share Posted October 13, 2015 From the SPFL A very happy James Tavernier from the same game From BDO. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scoobles Posted October 13, 2015 Share Posted October 13, 2015 The coroner? Only coroner I remember is Quincy and he's dead? Ah, I see what you did there 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE KING Posted October 14, 2015 Share Posted October 14, 2015 Aye Scotland, the only country in the world where Footie Fans in their thousands flood on to companies house website to celebrate their teams history. Its the only way to celebrate your traditions, according to Dave King. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stonedsailor Posted October 14, 2015 Share Posted October 14, 2015 ? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stonedsailor Posted October 14, 2015 Share Posted October 14, 2015 From the SPFL A very happy James Tavernier from the same game *Badge used under licence from Sportsdirect 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted October 14, 2015 Share Posted October 14, 2015 Is Ted actually using this discussion, as a chance to gloat about a victory over Peterhead? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
topcat(The most tip top) Posted October 14, 2015 Share Posted October 14, 2015 I assume that as your still arguing over the dualism of the Sevco/Rangers identity nothing important has actually happened lately? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
forever_blue Posted October 14, 2015 Share Posted October 14, 2015 (edited) Diddies still falling over each other trying to provide the proof which does not exist , carry on lads 54 and counting Edited October 14, 2015 by forever_blue -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
strichener Posted October 14, 2015 Share Posted October 14, 2015 Aye Scotland, the only country in the world where Footie Fans in their thousands flood on to companies house website to celebrate their teams history. What a strange interpretation. The Ranger's website is quite clear about who the club is, Companies House is where the official details are held, where funnily enough they use 2012 as the year of birth. I cannot help it if the SPFL don't recognise this but by the same token they also thought that Scottish football would be down the pan by now. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.