Jump to content

Big Rangers Administration/Liquidation Thread - All chat here!


Recommended Posts

Best word to come out of all of this shenanigans is Quantum.

As what word could better describe the sevco mindset or illustrate the complexity of Quantum theory than a club that can:

  • Be the old club
  • Be a new club
  • Be both at the same time
  • Be all of these things
  • Be none of these things

Depending on whether it's trophies, debts, directorships or paintings on a staircase.

ps My Team: Bo'ness, aye yer baws.

Where's the solace in all that :oops

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So you are saying Strichener is childish and immature and needs sheltering.

Ok I will try and take that on board from now on and go easy on the poor lad.

Nope.

I mean that gloating about winning things when the odds are stacked heavily in your favour, is instead hilariously infantile.

I think Ned' s got this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry Monkey, I am going to celebrate my team winning, no matter who they are playing, the fact this obviously irritates you is also enjoyable, it is not connected however.

In Strichners case he was being 'hilariously infantile' and pointing a page in companies house like it is the be all and end all of the history of that club, if that was the case then he supports a club founded in 1993. I was just helping the lad and pointed him in the direction of a site which keeps official records of these things.

*cough*Leeds*cough*

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow monkey just skips past the last few years and changes history.

Any more on this Bennett?

It was kind of you to suggest I've changed history, but in truth, my contribution has probably been marginally less significant.

I've still got no idea what you were actually on about though. Care to enlighten me?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That, as you are aware, was an entirely different scenario, another poster incorrectly claimed that Leeds oldco did not enter into liquidation, the page I posted proved otherwise, he has now admitted his error and is probably grateful that I corrected him.

Not a very good example of whatabouterry, but there you go.

And where was that page from?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That, as you are aware, was an entirely different scenario, another poster incorrectly claimed that Leeds oldco did not enter into liquidation, the page I posted proved otherwise, he has now admitted his error and is probably grateful that I corrected him.

Not a very good example of whatabouterry, but there you go.

Nobody's interested in the oldco or the newco all that matters is that Leeds the club wasn't liquidated, they came out of administration and are currently still paying their debts, Rangers didn't come out of administration and aren't paying their debts.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow monkey just skips past the last few years and changes history.

Wow. Charles Green let's slip a few lies with the corrupt football authorities and nearly changes continuation.

Thank f**k for the CAS, UEFAs three year rule and the serious fraud squad. Rangers nearly survived through.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

'Nobody's interested in the oldco or the newco' :lol: you have not read this thread at all.

The thing you call 'Leeds the club' did exit administration, when they entered liquidation and left a shitload of debt that will never get paid.

The thing I call 'Leeds the club' was sold 4 days after they failed a CVA to a newco, 5 years later Rangers followed exactly the same path.

Eh...why are Leeds still paying their debts then and Rangers aren't?

Also the CVA didn't fail ,it was aborted due to a hmrc challenge which was due to be heard after the season started , hence the FAs move the let Leeds carry on .

Rangers CVA failed before the league started and were liquidated.

Edited by THE KING
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...