Jump to content

Big Rangers Administration/Liquidation Thread - All chat here!


Recommended Posts

im glad you have enjoyed the lower divioson with rangers in them, must be exciting for you ;)

Seeing Rangers so reduced and humiliated, after years of triumphalism has indeed been terribly exciting.

I've even got to see my own wee team dish out a couple of hammerings to them and that was fun too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

im glad you have enjoyed the lower divioson with rangers in them, must be exciting for you ;)

I'm sure if Celtic had gone tits-up and their tribute act had been wedged into the Third you'd have enjoyed a right good belly laugh at them like the rest of us.

(I'd hazard a guess though that "Celtic" might not have provided quite the same lolz in that they probably wouldn't have stuck by a joke of a manager, spunked £1.8m on WIFI, needed loans from Sports Direct, chased away Sarver, etc. etc.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But heres the thing. Its actually gone all a little too quiet because there are some hugely significant questions - most of them money related - which remain unanswered and Kings low profile, long distance leadership has, in fact, created an information vacuum. And into this vacuum all manner of malicious and ill informed gossip is slowly being poured.

There is noise now warning of another financial collapse before the end of the season, of Murray Park being padlocked and all manner of other apocalyptic forecasts.

The truth of the matter is no-where near as dramatic. Yes, Rangers will need more money to get through the current campaign and that cash - probably something between £2m and £3m - will almost certainly come in the form of further soft loans from King and co-investors George Letham, Douglas Park, George Letham and George Taylor

Edited by bennett
Link to comment
Share on other sites

But heres the thing. Its actually gone all a little too quiet because there are some hugely significant questions - most of them money related - which remain unanswered and Kings low profile, long distance leadership has, in fact, created an information vacuum. And into this vacuum all manner of malicious and ill informed gossip is slowly being poured.

There is noise now warning of another financial collapse before the end of the season, of Murray Park being padlocked and all manner of other apocalyptic forecasts.

The truth of the matter is no-where near as dramatic. Yes, Rangers will need more money to get through the current campaign and that cash - probably something between £2m and £3m - will almost certainly come in the form of further soft loans from King and co-investors George Letham, Douglas Park, George Letham and George Taylor

George Letham must have plenty of money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Was that the Phil that said Murray Park would be padlocked last Tuesday or the Phil that said the administrators would be called in on Saturday Dear reader.

The Phil massive have went silent on that one....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But heres the thing. Its actually gone all a little too quiet because there are some hugely significant questions - most of them money related - which remain unanswered and Kings low profile, long distance leadership has, in fact, created an information vacuum. And into this vacuum all manner of malicious and ill informed gossip is slowly being poured.

There is noise now warning of another financial collapse before the end of the season, of Murray Park being padlocked and all manner of other apocalyptic forecasts.

The truth of the matter is no-where near as dramatic. Yes, Rangers will need more money to get through the current campaign and that cash - probably something between £2m and £3m - will almost certainly come in the form of further soft loans from King and co-investors George Letham, Douglas Park, George Letham and George Taylor

Why do you do that thing Bennett, of quoting at length from the article, without attributing it, or even using quotation marks?

It's irritating.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why do you do that thing Bennett, of quoting at length from the article, without attributing it, or even using quotation marks? It's irritating

obviously it's from the link king posted, as you well know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...