Double Jack D Posted November 12, 2015 Share Posted November 12, 2015 @jamesdoleman Brown says that there is a difference between the company and the business assets but not between a "club and a company" Brown "Sevco Scotland did not buy "the club" they bought the business and assets of the club" Common sense imo 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnnyc13 Posted November 12, 2015 Share Posted November 12, 2015 @jamesdolemanBrown Says a club is an "undertaking" of it's owners and as it "has neither capacity of personality" no-one can be CEO of it. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnnyc13 Posted November 12, 2015 Share Posted November 12, 2015 @JamesdolemanBrown asks "What act did this club carry out, how and by whom was he [Green] appointed to this club, in what terms" 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted November 12, 2015 Share Posted November 12, 2015 Genuine question - why do people call you Vicky? Ljc boat thread, nonsense board everyone's favourite Viking... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnnyc13 Posted November 12, 2015 Share Posted November 12, 2015 @jamesdoleman! The team are paid by Sevco, play at a ground owned by Sevco trained by a manager who is employed by Sevco, fans buy tickets from Sevco""That is the business that is being carried on." 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnnyc13 Posted November 12, 2015 Share Posted November 12, 2015 James Doleman @jamesdoleman 1m1 minute agoBrown "What is the players went one way and the ground another, where is the "club" then.? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnnyc13 Posted November 12, 2015 Share Posted November 12, 2015 James Doleman @jamesdoleman 2m2 minutes agoBrown. "I realise that Rangers being the same club is a matter of life and death to some," Havin ago at tedi now, not on 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ken Fitlike Posted November 12, 2015 Share Posted November 12, 2015 Genuine question - why do people call you Vicky? sjc's boat thread http://www.pieandbovril.com/forum/index.php/topic/202591-sjcs-boat-thread/page-12?hl=%2Bvicky+%2Bthe+%2Bviking#entry7446204 Bennett outed by mods using an alias and did an Olympic Gold ' Heads Gone' 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnnyc13 Posted November 12, 2015 Share Posted November 12, 2015 (edited) CG lawyer: It's a leap, in the interest of continuity, that the parties in this contract did not intend to be involved in the act carrried on Edited November 12, 2015 by johnnyc13 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dogmc Posted November 12, 2015 Share Posted November 12, 2015 Am I only who is surprised that the club / company issue is being debated so much....am I being thick in thinking that the issue should be if green had a clause in his contract insuring his legal costs and when that period of cover was meant to start? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnnyc13 Posted November 12, 2015 Share Posted November 12, 2015 @jamesdolemanBrown says Rangers was "a basket of assets that could be sold," but these were not indivisible. Brown "What is the players went one way and the ground another, where is the "club" then.?Brown. "I realise that Rangers being the same club is a matter of life and death to some,"James: Wouldn't be a proper legal case without "the elephant in the room" getting mentioned 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnnyc13 Posted November 12, 2015 Share Posted November 12, 2015 Grant 4m4 minutes agoCG lawyer: One is trying to find out what the parties meant by Rangers Football Club 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted November 12, 2015 Share Posted November 12, 2015 Am I only who is surprised that the club / company issue is being debated so much....am I being thick in thinking that the issue should be if green had a clause in his contract insuring his legal costs and when that period of cover was meant to start? Some of the offences relate to before d and P sold Rangers to them and he was a director of sevco, not Rangers football club... My non expert layman's view. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ned Nederlander Posted November 12, 2015 Share Posted November 12, 2015 I have absolutely no idea what's going on anymore. This. What the actual f'ck is happening now? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnnyc13 Posted November 12, 2015 Share Posted November 12, 2015 Grant Russell @STVGrant 17m17 minutes agoCG lawyer: Difference between Rangers and Woolworths... Any Newco of Woolworths would have bought the undertaking. Not the personality. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dogmc Posted November 12, 2015 Share Posted November 12, 2015 Some of the offences relate to before d and P sold Rangers to them and he was a director of sevco, not Rangers football club... My non expert layman's view. Would the contract clause not have a start date for when this legal insurance cover thingy came into effect? Is it not a simple case of cover starts on x date and anything before that is down to green? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jambomo Posted November 12, 2015 Share Posted November 12, 2015 Would the contract clause not have a start date for when this legal insurance cover thingy came into effect? Is it not a simple case of cover starts on x date and anything before that is down to green? One of the tweets said the contract showed it was backdated to the 1st June 2012 - which I guess would be when it would start. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted November 12, 2015 Share Posted November 12, 2015 Would the contract clause not have a start date for when this legal insurance cover thingy came into effect? Is it not a simple case of cover starts on x date and anything before that is down to green? Sure I read a tweet saying it was backdated, Rfc QC saying that can't happen. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteRoseKillie Posted November 12, 2015 Share Posted November 12, 2015 Would the contract clause not have a start date for when this legal insurance cover thingy came into effect? Is it not a simple case of cover starts on x date and anything before that is down to green? "A simple case"... Dear me, you've not been keeping up with these loons, have you? Don't worry, Tedi will be along soon to tell us what the real story is. Expect many references to the ASA and UEFA. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteRoseKillie Posted November 12, 2015 Share Posted November 12, 2015 Sure I read a tweet saying it was backdated, Rfc QC saying that can't happen. RFC or RIFC or RFC(2012) or RFC(IL)? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.