aofjays Posted December 3, 2015 Share Posted December 3, 2015 Nobody was disputing that - you're the one who introduced a superfluous "and" into the mix. ETA: You were right, Strichener. Are you outing NewHope as an alias of THE KING? Well, you should know. You're so much of a spam your middle names are Fray and Bentos. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jarkko Wiss Posted December 3, 2015 Share Posted December 3, 2015 Go on then, china. Explain how I have been, "liberal with the truth" wrt to Oor Martin. I have a hefty wager you're doing the diddy thing of talking bollocks. What a seething mess you are. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aofjays Posted December 3, 2015 Share Posted December 3, 2015 What a seething mess you are. But it is very nice of him to give up his valuable drinking time to entertain us. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shanghai Loon Posted December 3, 2015 Share Posted December 3, 2015 BRALT Wurst surely not? ^^^ Würst post ever 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE KING Posted December 3, 2015 Share Posted December 3, 2015 Nobody was disputing that - you're the one who introduced a superfluous "and" into the mix. ETA: You were right, Strichener. Eh, no it wasn't? And that's the point I was making... Well, you should know. You're so much of a spam your middle names are Fray and Bentos. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE KING Posted December 3, 2015 Share Posted December 3, 2015 TBRALACMPT The Big Rangers Administration Liquidation and Compoud words Meat Puns Thread. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted December 3, 2015 Share Posted December 3, 2015 Lets be clear, though - spam the forum like that again and you will be banned HTH Bloody Hell ref - that's lenient. My good friend No8 gets banned, simply for quoting eminent eye witnesses on the extent of Large John's knowledge. This tiresome clown however, gets to bore everyone to tears, having set about attempting to knacker the whole forum. Christ, LNS would consider this unjust. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacksgranda Posted December 3, 2015 Share Posted December 3, 2015 Eh, no it wasn't? And that's the point I was making... Yes it was, and no you weren't. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Homer Thompson Posted December 3, 2015 Share Posted December 3, 2015 Bloody Hell ref - that's lenient. My good friend No8 gets banned, simply for quoting eminent eye witnesses on the extent of Large John's knowledge. This tiresome clown however, gets to bore everyone to tears, having set about attempting to knacker the whole forum. Christ, LNS would consider this unjust. It was the Rangers forum in the middle of the night, I doubt anyone noticed. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted December 3, 2015 Share Posted December 3, 2015 It was the Rangers forum in the middle of the night, I doubt anyone noticed. We're in side letter territory now. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE KING Posted December 3, 2015 Share Posted December 3, 2015 Yes it was, and no you weren't. Even though NewHope used it and that's been the whole point of the argument?! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Homer Thompson Posted December 3, 2015 Share Posted December 3, 2015 We're in side letter territory now. I concluded that MRF-xxxxxxxx gained no posting advantage from his spamming. Theres also no evidence that those posts wouldnt have been spammed anyway 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobby Skidmarks Posted December 3, 2015 Share Posted December 3, 2015 My good friend No8 gets banned, simply for quoting eminent eye witnesses on the extent of Large John's knowledge. Great, harmless fun that. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE KING Posted December 3, 2015 Share Posted December 3, 2015 I concluded that MRF-xxxxxxxx gained no posting advantage from his spamming. Theres also no evidence that those posts wouldnt have been spammed anyway Hod on, he would never have reach that post count had he not illegally spammed, surely those posts must be stripped? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted December 3, 2015 Share Posted December 3, 2015 Great, harmless fun that. Not fun, but a valid topic for discussion. Nothing offensive was posted. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted December 3, 2015 Share Posted December 3, 2015 I concluded that MRF-xxxxxxxx gained no posting advantage from his spamming. Theres also no evidence that those posts wouldnt have been spammed anyway There is no need however to prove posting advantage. Spamming is traditionally treated seriously by P&B's governing bodies. Offences on much smaller scales have been met with bans in the past. Here we had deliberate and widespread spamming. Whether posting advantage is sought or achieved is immaterial. Rules were systematically broken. Justice has not been served. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Homer Thompson Posted December 3, 2015 Share Posted December 3, 2015 Hod on, he would never have reach that post count had he not illegally spammed, surely those posts must be stripped? Post stripping is not on the table. There is no need however to prove posting advantage. Spamming is traditionally treated seriously by P&B's governing bodies. Offences on much smaller scales have been met with bans in the past. Here we had deliberate and widespread spamming. Whether posting advantage is sought or achieved is immaterial. Rules were systematically broken. Justice has not been served. But the BRALT needs a strong MRF-xxxxxxx. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ken Fitlike Posted December 3, 2015 Share Posted December 3, 2015 Post stripping is not on the table. But the BRALT needs a strong MRF-xxxxxxx. Took it too far.... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Granny Danger Posted December 3, 2015 Share Posted December 3, 2015 Post stripping is not on the table. But the BRALT needs a strong MRF-xxxxxxx. ^^^^^^ Establishment lackey. The Jim Traynor of P&B Something else derogatory (I'm too tired to think of anything else) 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnstoun Posted December 3, 2015 Share Posted December 3, 2015 Bloody Hell ref - that's lenient. My good friend No8 gets banned, simply for quoting eminent eye witnesses on the extent of Large John's knowledge. This tiresome clown however, gets to bore everyone to tears, having set about attempting to knacker the whole forum. Christ, LNS would consider this unjust. ^^^^ Whataboutery. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.