stonedsailor Posted February 15, 2013 Share Posted February 15, 2013 The part of my post which states;any club, should answer your question. SS you'll need to remind me what action you're on about because for the life of me i can't find any post over the last two days in which i've directly conversed with you. I do apologise, I was meaning to address BWM. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stonedsailor Posted February 15, 2013 Share Posted February 15, 2013 Now it's becoming more clearer. What about the arbitration. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
youngsy Posted February 15, 2013 Share Posted February 15, 2013 I do apologise, I was meaning to address BWM. What about the arbitration. No,about the post above this one. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
No8. Posted February 15, 2013 Share Posted February 15, 2013 I spent 20 odd years frying my brains with chemicals, I think I can handle a few dimwits. Really? Fried brain? We'd never have guessed 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beermonkey Posted February 15, 2013 Share Posted February 15, 2013 Now it's becoming more clearer. Becoming more clear Or Becoming clearer Not Becoming more clearer 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henrik's tongue Posted February 15, 2013 Share Posted February 15, 2013 Really? Fried brain? We'd never have guessed ^^^^ Zombie Cookbook type post imo. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hellbhoy Posted February 15, 2013 Share Posted February 15, 2013 :lol: :lol: All the sevconians scrambling around claiming relevance to a dead club still being very much alive pure dead funny watching the posts from them. OK a challenge to the sevconians ! post one piece of evidence from when Green bought the assets that he bought the CLUB as well ? There's another pile of pish doing the rounds on orc forums that because the assets were sold before liquidation that the club transferred over The PLC was forced to sell the stadium and facilities to pay off it's debt and was still the club up until the sale of assets. I see Tedi has been simmering on a meltdown PLEASING 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bendarroch Posted February 15, 2013 Share Posted February 15, 2013 I'm shocked, Rangers fan trying to deflect the attention by bringing up a unrelated Celtic story into the thread. Unrelated? The tenuous nature of items 'related' to the thread title makes that ridiculous assertion of yours sound particularly wanky. Plastic in cannae take it shocker... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bearwithme Posted February 15, 2013 Share Posted February 15, 2013 post one piece of evidence from when Green bought the assets that he bought the CLUB as well ? Lord Nimmo Smith et al say in their Note of "Reasons" for the decision dated 12 September 2012: "On 14 June 2012 a newly incorporated company, Sevco Scotland Limited, purchased substantially all the business and assets of Oldco, including Rangers FC". 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hellbhoy Posted February 15, 2013 Share Posted February 15, 2013 Lord Nimmo Smith et al say in their Note of "Reasons" for the decision dated 12 September 2012: "On 14 June 2012 a newly incorporated company, Sevco Scotland Limited, purchased substantially all the business and assets of Oldco, including Rangers FC". AW FCUK ! that old flustercluck again ! If you read further down the line section 45 then you come to the argument on which date Rangers FC died ! the 14th of June or 3rd of August.Also your post comes undone if the commission states that the PLC still was a club up until 3rd of August. Then we come to what Nimmo is actually stating what is his belief by the remit supplied to Nimmo by the SPL and why this commission is being chaired by him on behalf of the SPL. You ragers fans complain about how corrupt the SPL are but here you are posting their propaganda pish like it's the gospel,and where all this company is separate from the club shite was first mentioned by Green after he heard Nimmo's belief on Rangers FC.This is not actually Lord Nimmo's view on Rangers FC,as he is only ruling on the SPL's behalf that the SPL are correct in this matter,And by all means could go completely tits up for Rangers FC and the SPL if Nimmo then rules completely different according to the SFA's and SPL's rulebooks and they are both similar. Lastly for clarity on Lord Nimmo ! The SPL asked him to chair a commission ! the SPL then gave Nimmo their evidence "remit" ! Nimmo read the document and came to what is his belief according to his remit ! Nimmo then made a public statement and you can find all he said in the remit the SPL gave Nimmo ! Nimmo is not a Scottish football rulebook expert,he is only a judge ! And Tedi failed to answer this one ? where did Lord Nimmo get his information to come to his belief ? ANSWER it was in the remit the SPL gave Nimmo !.The remit was not written by Lord Nimmo himself it was given to him by the SPL for him to rule upon. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bearwithme Posted February 15, 2013 Share Posted February 15, 2013 AW FCUK ! that old flustercluck again ! If you read further down the line section 45 then you come to the argument on which date Rangers FC died ! the 14th of June or 3rd of August.Also your post comes undone if the commission states that the PLC still was a club up until 3rd of August. Then we come to what Nimmo is actually stating what is his belief by the remit supplied to Nimmo by the SPL and why this commission is being chaired by him on behalf of the SPL. You ragers fans complain about how corrupt the SPL are but here you are posting their propaganda pish like it's the gospel,and where all this company is separate from the club shite was first mentioned by Green after he heard Nimmo's belief on Rangers FC.This is not actually Lord Nimmo's view on Rangers FC,as he is only ruling on the SPL's behalf that the SPL are correct in this matter,And by all means could go completely tits up for Rangers FC and the SPL if Nimmo then rules completely different according to the SFA's and SPL's rulebooks and they are both similar. Lastly for clarity on Lord Nimmo ! The SPL asked him to chair a commission ! the SPL then gave Nimmo their evidence "remit" ! Nimmo read the document and came to what is his belief according to his remit ! Nimmo then made a public statement and you can find all he said in the remit the SPL gave Nimmo ! Nimmo is not a Scottish football rulebook expert,he is only a judge ! And Tedi failed to answer this one ? where did Lord Nimmo get his information to come to his belief ? ANSWER it was in the remit the SPL gave Nimmo !.The remit was not written by Lord Nimmo himself it was given to him by the SPL for him to rule upon. You sound like the "rager". What I posted was a statement from Lord Nimmo Smith and his legal colleagues. Your claims about their document and the statements they make in it have already been shown to be nonsense. -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Celtic Rebel. Posted February 15, 2013 Share Posted February 15, 2013 Unrelated? The tenuous nature of items 'related' to the thread title makes that ridiculous assertion of yours sound particularly wanky. Plastic in cannae take it shocker... Canny take it? Neither could zombies. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted February 15, 2013 Share Posted February 15, 2013 They had been warned about Craig Whyte when he took over http://www.pieandbovril.com/forum/index.php/topic/150403-whytes-track-record/?hl=%2Bcraig+%2Bwhyte+%2Btake+%2Bover#entry6188707 Christ, that's a belter of a little thread. I've no real recollection of it, despite apparently making a minor contribution. I suppose this Rangers saga is a bit like the sixties. If you remember it, you weren't there. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
youngsy Posted February 15, 2013 Share Posted February 15, 2013 Becoming more clear Or Becoming clearer Not Becoming more clearer Well thank you Mr pedantic. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AUFC90 Posted February 15, 2013 Share Posted February 15, 2013 I would hate for any other Scottish club to die. That's why i just can't understand why on Earth Hearts aren't separating the club from the company before it's too late ? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted February 15, 2013 Share Posted February 15, 2013 Meanwhile, back in the real world of plastic... http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/21472237 Are Alberto Undiano Mallenco's windaes about to be panned in? Jesus H Christ what a whalloper Lennon is. Now they've started intimidating foriegn refs as well as Scottish ones. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Apache Don Posted February 15, 2013 Share Posted February 15, 2013 Interesting question Rangers vs Jesus If Jesus died on the cross and was then resurrected, should we not call him Newco Jesus? Furthermore, should he not be stripped of his past miracles? Pathetic! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AUFC90 Posted February 15, 2013 Share Posted February 15, 2013 Jesus H Christ what a whalloper Lennon is. Now they've started intimidating foriegn refs as well as Scottish ones. Since when was intimidating the same as criticizing? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hellbhoy Posted February 15, 2013 Share Posted February 15, 2013 You sound like the "rager". What I posted was a statement from Lord Nimmo Smith and his legal colleagues. Your claims about their document and the statements they make in it have already been shown to be nonsense. REALLY ! let's break down the remit on the first page shall we.You will notice at the bottom of it that a draft was given to Lord Nimmo,this was the remit the SPL supplied to the commission for the commission to agree on before they agreed to chair the commission and to be compleltely impartial about it.Then later that day Lord Nimmo gave a statement that this was his belief after agreeing on the draft to become their remit. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hellbhoy Posted February 15, 2013 Share Posted February 15, 2013 Jesus H Christ what a whalloper Lennon is. Now they've started intimidating foriegn refs as well as Scottish ones. Aye Benny like a Rangers manager has never complained about bad refereeing ! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.