hellbhoy Posted February 17, 2014 Share Posted February 17, 2014 Let's highlight a different bit. You didn't read that through properly before replying did you BWM ? It was quoting the similarity between "in common speech" and "legal terms ie the law of the land" the conclusion that it "APPEARS NO DIFFERENT" doesn't actually pertain to Rangers FC being legally recognisable as a club any more, but it is to the associations "in common speech" to be the same kind of constitution as a legal recognition by comparison. Meaning because the Scottish Football Association recognise Rangers as the very same entity it was because they have written into their rules & regulations to them what now defines being a member club, it means to the SFA it is the same club because the SFA say so and it's written in their rules to say so even if the HMRC are actually liquidating a football club founded in 1872 called Rangers Football Club PLC aKa RFC2012 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bearwithme Posted February 18, 2014 Share Posted February 18, 2014 You didn't read that through properly before replying did you BWM ? It was quoting the similarity between "in common speech" and "legal terms ie the law of the land" the conclusion that it "APPEARS NO DIFFERENT" doesn't actually pertain to Rangers FC being legally recognisable as a club any more, but it is to the associations "in common speech" to be the same kind of constitution as a legal recognition by comparison. Meaning because the Scottish Football Association recognise Rangers as the very same entity it was because they have written into their rules & regulations to them what now defines being a member club, it means to the SFA it is the same club because the SFA say so and it's written in their rules to say so even if the HMRC are actually liquidating a football club founded in 1872 called Rangers Football Club PLC aKa RFC2012 Yes I did. I have to compliment you on your creativity though. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hellbhoy Posted February 18, 2014 Share Posted February 18, 2014 Yes I did. I have to compliment you on your creativity though. Apology accepted 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted February 18, 2014 Share Posted February 18, 2014 I'm not sure how I missed that, but if I'd known I'd have answered without doubt - thanks for asking at all. It was just after you'd Christened me the Diddy Dawkins. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phasma ex machina Posted February 18, 2014 Share Posted February 18, 2014 Record actually mention it.. SECRET recordings of Craig Whyte and Charles Green discussing the takeover of Rangers are to be used as evidence in a £28million court case, it was reported today.The club’s liquidators BDO began legal action last year against Whyte’s lawyers Collyer Bristow, claiming the law firm was partially responsible for the downfall of the club, negligence and breach of trust. Collyer Bristow has denied the allegations.In a pre-trial hearing held yesterday in London’s Royal Courts of Justice, judge Mr Justice Newey ruled that recordings of Whyte in conversation with others involved in the takeover were admissible as evidence.The recordings along with a series of documents relating to the club were leaked on the anonymous Twitter account “Charlotte Fakes.”As well as tapes of Whyte discussing his Rangers takeover, the account published e-mails between the club and their PR advisors, and documents concerning the club’s finances.The leaks led to an online debate with fans discussing who was behind the leaks and whether the documents were genuine.Cyril Kinsky QC, representing Collyer Bristow, told the court there were concerns that the recordings may have been illegally obtained, but he claimed that they had been circulated widely on internet forums and so were no longer confidential.Last year Police Scotland said they were investigating the source of the leaks, but Mark Phillips QC, representing BDO, told the court that police last week dropped their objections to the recordings being used as evidence and that Craig Whyte himself had no issue with them being heard.Philips argued that transcripts of the recordings should be partially redacted to remove references to confidential legal advice received by Whyte, and Mr Justice Newey agreed that edited transcripts should be made available.The case is due to be heard next January. ''Downfall of the club''.........not 'company'.......that will be popular 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bendarroch Posted February 18, 2014 Share Posted February 18, 2014 It was just after you'd Christened me the Diddy Dawkins. I see it now - I knew you would be pleased. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted February 18, 2014 Share Posted February 18, 2014 You didn't read that through properly before replying did you BWM ? It was quoting the similarity between "in common speech" and "legal terms ie the law of the land" the conclusion that it "APPEARS NO DIFFERENT" doesn't actually pertain to Rangers FC being legally recognisable as a club any more, but it is to the associations "in common speech" to be the same kind of constitution as a legal recognition by comparison. Meaning because the Scottish Football Association recognise Rangers as the very same entity it was because they have written into their rules & regulations to them what now defines being a member club, it means to the SFA it is the same club because the SFA say so and it's written in their rules to say so even if the HMRC are actually liquidating a football club founded in 1872 called Rangers Football Club PLC aKa RFC2012 Having a top legal expert like yourself explaining it all makes a huge difference.... -5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AberdeenBud Posted February 18, 2014 Share Posted February 18, 2014 Record actually mention it.. ''Downfall of the club''.........not 'company'.......that will be popular And "the club's liquidators". Another for the list of enemies. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wulliamwallace Posted February 18, 2014 Share Posted February 18, 2014 Can any sevco fans tell me who owns the title deeds ? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BossHogg Posted February 18, 2014 Share Posted February 18, 2014 Ahem.. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
forever_blue Posted February 18, 2014 Share Posted February 18, 2014 Ahem.. shame he was treated like shite by your support then and booed onto the pitch at a league flag presentation.... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ken Fitlike Posted February 18, 2014 Share Posted February 18, 2014 shame he was treated like shite by your support then and booed onto the pitch at a league flag presentation.... while followers of Rangers 1872 (RIP) and Rangers / Sevco 2012wildly applaud every chancer who arrives to rip them off and bankrupt their club(s) 'it's a funny old game Saint, and no mistake' 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteRoseKillie Posted February 18, 2014 Share Posted February 18, 2014 while followers of Rangers 1872 (RIP) and Rangers / Sevco 2012wildly applaud every chancer who arrives to rip them off and bankrupt their club(s) 'it's a funny old game Saint, and no mistake' That'll be the Dignity, ken, Ken. Fúcking expensive it's proving, that dignity. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hellbhoy Posted February 18, 2014 Share Posted February 18, 2014 They played on a public park for the first 3 or 4 years. I'll admit defeat to point there CB, can't be arsed with actual dates & figures but the club paid taxes before it became a Ltd company for sure. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hellbhoy Posted February 18, 2014 Share Posted February 18, 2014 Having a top legal expert like yourself explaining it all makes a huge difference.... WTF , no "wurs me enigma machine", "can someone decipher this into English", "I have a migraine now", "my eyes are bleeding reading that" & your favourite "10 words or less". It would appear the long suffering Benny has had a moment of clarity from his self imposed dementia ! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hellbhoy Posted February 18, 2014 Share Posted February 18, 2014 shame he was treated like shite by your support then and booed onto the pitch at a league flag presentation.... Truly desperate attempt at straw clutching there Blue. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
forever_blue Posted February 18, 2014 Share Posted February 18, 2014 Truly desperate attempt at straw clutching there Blue. just pointing out a fact 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted February 18, 2014 Share Posted February 18, 2014 Truly desperate attempt at straw clutching there Blue. He's right though. McCann was treated shamefully and the lauding of him now, represents hypocritical revisionism. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted February 18, 2014 Share Posted February 18, 2014 WTF , no "wurs me enigma machine", "can someone decipher this into English", "I have a migraine now", "my eyes are bleeding reading that" & your favourite "10 words or less". It would appear the long suffering Benny has had a moment of clarity from his self imposed dementia ! It was a very informative post, you know that you if you played your cards right you could maybe become the new Paul McConville type figure that the celtic support is crying out for... -2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted February 18, 2014 Share Posted February 18, 2014 while followers of Rangers 1872 (RIP) and Rangers / Sevco 2012wildly applaud every chancer who arrives to rip them off and bankrupt their club(s) 'it's a funny old game Saint, and no mistake' Kens brown nosing the greenyins again. Who'd have thunked it? -2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.