Jump to content

Big Rangers Administration/Liquidation Thread - All chat here!


Recommended Posts

I have read up a wee bit on Warburton, it would appear of the course of his short 18 month tenure as a manager he hasn't actually bought any of the players at Brentford. It would appear that it was the owner who was using some sort of money ball statistical analysis to hire players who statistically suited his squad model.

I do not see why the bears are getting their panties wet at all. Warburton managed a squad of players the owner hand picked himself.

Back in January Warburton asked to procure new players to bolster the squad, the owner said NO because it might unsettle the squad as it is.

Warburton has no track record for buying players and might actually sign a bunch of donkeys because he hasn't any experience of putting together a squad of players of his own choosing. This could go really badly or good for The Rangers but gambling on an inexperienced manager who hasn't assembled a team of his own choosing isn't worth a 3 year contract.

The fact that no other English club came running for his services maybe shows that the English clubs didn't rate or fancy his chances seeing as it was the owner who personally hand picked Brentford's players.

It is in the media he has been chosen to shift ST's, the better option would have been to find a manager with a decent track record and a proven record to get clubs promoted.

Mind you

Neilson coasted the championship with Craig Levein doing the signings.

Of course Rangers don't have Craig Levein

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mind you

Neilson coasted the championship with Craig Levein doing the signings.

Of course Rangers don't have Craig Levein

Levein had years of experience though, Warburton is a novice of sorts with not a lot of experience.

I wonder how Warburton will cope if he does not get of to a flyer and the Sevconians get irate by doing what they usually do when things aren't going well.

Warburton didn't have much expectation at Brentford because they overachieved, Brentford's first priority in the English Championship was relegation safety and finishing 5th definitely took the pressure off and promotion to the EPL was a huge bonus if they won it.

Warburton's expectations at The Rangers is 1st place and automatic promotion and by as many points more than the best of the rest with cup finals in the major cups. Warburton has been given very high goals to achieve especially at Ibrox, no leeway other than win the Championship.

Will Warburton crack under the pressure if The Rangers perform badly ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Levein had years of experience though, Warburton is a novice of sorts with not a lot of experience.

I wonder how Warburton will cope if he does not get of to a flyer and the Sevconians get irate by doing what they usually do when things aren't going well.

Warburton didn't have much expectation at Brentford because they overachieved, Brentford's first priority in the English Championship was relegation safety and finishing 5th definitely took the pressure off and promotion to the EPL was a huge bonus if they won it.

Warburton's expectations at The Rangers is 1st place and automatic promotion and by as many points more than the best of the rest with cup finals in the major cups. Warburton has been given very high goals to achieve especially at Ibrox, no leeway other than win the Championship.

Will Warburton crack under the pressure if The Rangers perform badly ?

He ain't worried, in unrelated news,any truth to the rumour he has moved into a new home with a 32 acre garden that need's some work done to it :1eye

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He ain't worried, in unrelated news,any truth to the rumour he has moved into a new home with a 32 acre garden that need's some work done to it :1eye

if true the rangers have a gardener on pay roll. he could help out

Link to comment
Share on other sites

in english what does this mean?

Sports direct have a charge over Murray park, apparently, sportsscotland had one that predates it, signed afterwards.. It could negate the loan deal with an interesting part on the sd loan regarding it being payable on demand. You know, the loan they don't want to repay

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sports direct have a charge over Murray park, apparently, sportsscotland had one that predates it, signed afterwards.. It could negate the loan deal with an interesting part on the sd loan regarding it being payable on demand. You know, the loan they don't want to repay

and who are Sportsscotland. ? Is this something to do with Charles green ? Or even better Mr whyte ?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sports direct have a charge over Murray park, apparently, sportsscotland had one that predates it, signed afterwards.. It could negate the loan deal with an interesting part on the sd loan regarding it being payable on demand. You know, the loan they don't want to repay

Right let me get this right.

You are saying sportscotland have a charge over the training ground but it was signed after the Sportsdirect charge, yet the date of the Sportscotland charge predates the Sportsdirect charge?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Right let me get this right.

You are saying sportscotland have a charge over the training ground but it was signed after the Sportsdirect charge, yet the date of the Sportscotland charge predates the Sportsdirect charge?

is this not some sort of fraud. Using a place they don't own as collateral on a loan.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

is this not some sort of fraud. Using a place they don't own as collateral on a loan.

I don't know. I am not following what is being alluded to.

I read weirdcal's post and my question is to gain some clarity on what he is trying to say.

Clause 2.1 is interesting seeing as how Tedi et al are convinced that no repayment date means it does not have to be repaid. Looks like Rangers have agreed to pay SD on demand.

Not sure that I understand the warrandice clause. It looks like two other companies hold security from the pre liquidation of Rangers FC PLC or us that to do with leases?

post-1724-14344465550418_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does clause 10 mean that the old security is now void or does it mean that there is a previous security on the property which has to be taken into account during any default?

post-1724-14344478054352_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know. I am not following what is being alluded to.

I read weirdcal's post and my question is to gain some clarity on what he is trying to say.

Clause 2.1 is interesting seeing as how Tedi et al are convinced that no repayment date means it does not have to be repaid. Looks like Rangers have agreed to pay SD on demand.

Not sure that I understand the warrandice clause. It looks like two other companies hold security from the pre liquidation of Rangers FC PLC or us that to do with leases?

There's no mechanism to invest a penny into rangers and they don't owe any loans...leave TEDI alone!...whahaaaaa
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...