the 67 Posted November 30, 2015 Share Posted November 30, 2015 BDO are required to get the best possible amount for all creditors, they clearly feel that HMRC are at it and by not appealing will suck up most of the pot available, oh and its not tax payers money that fund the appeal, its money coming from the creditors pot, but nice try in talking utter shite once again, im guessing now that the league is a formality and your european thread is barely worth venturing into that you will be back here rabbling a lot of unadulterated pish for the rest of the season? Rabbling a lot of unadulterated pish.....bit like you when you got banned Jim for racism now forced to troll with yer alias account.....are you still a member of that Stargate fans forum????? Tragic. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted November 30, 2015 Share Posted November 30, 2015 So am I being accused of being consistently inconsistent or inconsistently consistent? The first one. You're consistently holding onto the position you were formerly inconsistent in switching to. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stonedsailor Posted November 30, 2015 Share Posted November 30, 2015 *you're x 2 As in you're fucking raging. Does grammar feature in the IQ test? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stonedsailor Posted November 30, 2015 Share Posted November 30, 2015 U wot blud? I just read back his post. The highly intelligent individual, with an IQ which eclipses any we could offer, also uses the word "then" when he should be using the word "than". I am suspecting that he is bigging himself up a little and perhaps all his insightful posts should be treated with just the slightest amount of caution, he may be mistaken in some of his conclusions. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted November 30, 2015 Share Posted November 30, 2015 A quote from the telegraph " However, it is believed that one argument against the supposition that Rangers secured players by means of EBTs is that a range of variable inducements were in operation at that time and not only at Ibrox. Other avoidance schemes involved investment in such vehicles as film production companies and forestry development" Film production companies? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave.j Posted November 30, 2015 Share Posted November 30, 2015 A quote from the telegraph " However, it is believed that one argument against the supposition that Rangers secured players by means of EBTs is that a range of variable inducements were in operation at that time and not only at Ibrox. Other avoidance schemes involved investment in such vehicles as film production companies and forestry development" Film production companies? Whataboutery thread, for this pish. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
54_and_counting Posted November 30, 2015 Share Posted November 30, 2015 Whataboutery thread, for this pish. isnt that what the BRALT thread turned into about 3 years ago anyway? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henrik's tongue Posted November 30, 2015 Share Posted November 30, 2015 isnt that what the BRALT thread turned into about 3 years ago anyway? Shit questions thread for this pish! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
williemillersmoustache Posted November 30, 2015 Share Posted November 30, 2015 The never-ending story What role did the tax case(s) play in all of this? The most important point in this entire affair is that Rangers’ failure to disclose the ‘side-letters’ allowed the situation to build to a point where there would be no escape from the inevitable insolvency. The evasiveness over ‘side-letters’ meant that a CVA was always unlikely. The use of taxes collected in season 2011/12 as working capital just banged down the lid on the coffin and made liquidation a certainty. The window for saving Rangers was in 2004. With every passing season, David Murray’s reckless spending and his board’s failure to implement spending cuts, the tar pit that was waiting for Rangers just got deeper and stickier. Only in the past few weeks have we seen the emergence of a most gentle repudiation of the disastrous David Murray years in the Scottish press. Scottish football has been slowly recovering from the effects of trying to compete with Murray’s ways. Yet there are some in positions of supposed influence at Hampden who seem to be actively trying to recreate this period rather than ensure it can never happen again. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeartsOfficialMoaner Posted November 30, 2015 Share Posted November 30, 2015 The never-ending story When are Rangers fans going to turn on DM? They are always making excuses for him. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
williemillersmoustache Posted November 30, 2015 Share Posted November 30, 2015 You will find many Rangers fans turning on DM on this thread. We condemn these minor clerical errors in the strongest possible terms! Yeah we've seen what passes for criticism of moonbeams on here. You'd call it a bit reckless putting the club at risk like that. But you will always stop short of admitting the level of dishonesty required to do what was done. As then you'd have to admit you were cheats and that the last 10 to 13 years your club was alive was meaningless for you and tainted for everyone else. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted November 30, 2015 Share Posted November 30, 2015 We condemn these minor clerical errors in the strongest possible terms! Yeah we've seen what passes for criticism of moonbeams on here. You'd call it a bit reckless putting the club at risk like that. But you will always stop short of admitting the level of dishonesty required to do what was done. As then you'd have to admit you were cheats and that the last 10 to 13 years your club was alive was meaningless for you and tainted for everyone else. Exactly. Any criticism of Murray is tempered by the fact that they love the baubles he arrogantly, dishonestly, brought. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeartsOfficialMoaner Posted November 30, 2015 Share Posted November 30, 2015 You will find many Rangers fans turning on DM on this thread. Whyte, Green and King are all dicks but he is the baddest. What he did to your club. He screwed Rangers and never gave a shit. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
williemillersmoustache Posted November 30, 2015 Share Posted November 30, 2015 (edited) I was calling him an utter c**t 3 years ago alongside hoping he spent some time detained at her majesty's pleasure, not sure I could have gone much further without incurring a ban TBH. This is just a myth that wallopers like you and the rodent push from time to time and much like the rest of the nonsense contained in your drivel daily it has no substance. So why is he a c**t and why should he be in jail? To save a bit of time my next next post will be along the lines of: And........ Edited November 30, 2015 by williemillersmoustache 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted November 30, 2015 Share Posted November 30, 2015 When are Rangers fans going to turn on DM? They are always making excuses for him. Danger Mouse? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted November 30, 2015 Share Posted November 30, 2015 The first one. You're consistently holding onto the position you were formerly inconsistent in switching to. You're losing me. I'm pretty sure I said something like, "Now we know the outcome of the FTTT then the LNS inquiry is pretty pointless". Pretty prophetic, in hindsight. No? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weirdcal Posted November 30, 2015 Share Posted November 30, 2015 Danger Mouse?Donnie murdo 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted November 30, 2015 Share Posted November 30, 2015 You're losing me. I'm pretty sure I said something like, "Now we know the outcome of the FTTT then the LNS inquiry is pretty pointless". Pretty prophetic, in hindsight. No? No, there was plenty of point in such an inquiry taking place. There are huge question marks however, regarding how it conducted its business. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted November 30, 2015 Share Posted November 30, 2015 There are huge question marks however, regarding how it conducted its business. Really? I have never, more than two years on, heard one word of criticism over the way it was conducted. It was clear, consistent, thoughtful and well documented. Fulfilled the "justice must be seen to be done" maxim in an exemplary way. What aspect(s) of its conduct have you issues with and why has no one else raised this? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE KING Posted November 30, 2015 Share Posted November 30, 2015 oh and its not tax payers money that fund the appeal, its money coming from the creditors pot, So the BDO will be paying HMRCs legal fees if it goes to the supreme court? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.