Sergeant Wilson Posted July 19, 2014 Share Posted July 19, 2014 I'd be leaving a 33,000 foot trail of diarrhoea through the Ukrainian sky. Good luck going through my pockets, looters. Your troosers would probably be about 10 miles away. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hillonearth Posted July 19, 2014 Share Posted July 19, 2014 Your troosers would probably be about 10 miles away. And they'd instantly overtake Chernobyl as the most toxic place in the Ukraine wherever they landed. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silvio Tattiescone Posted July 19, 2014 Share Posted July 19, 2014 Alleged? Oh Christ, you're one of them 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshbairn Posted July 19, 2014 Share Posted July 19, 2014 Here we go.. There's a wee difference between a blown up plane falling in bits to the ground, and a plane flying near horizontally at 500 miles an hour into a building, or a 45 or so degrees into a field. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jagfox Posted July 19, 2014 Share Posted July 19, 2014 (edited) Supposedly this is linked to Putin's visit to South American nations next week and a spate of high ranking bankers all connected to the JP Morgan group and the Rothchilds(sp?) commiting suicide over the last 6 months... Edited July 19, 2014 by jagfox(Pt) 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AberdeenBud Posted July 19, 2014 Share Posted July 19, 2014 ^^^ ran out of tinfoil. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hillonearth Posted July 19, 2014 Share Posted July 19, 2014 (edited) Sorry if its been posted already but the wreckage this plane left makes you think back to the alleged plane that hit the pentagon and the one that crashed in the field in Pennsylvania In a previous thread about 9/11 conspiracies I mentioned that the Pentagon crash happened at rush hour a few hundred yards from the main I-95 leading into DC from Virginia. The conspiracy theorists consistently ignore the hundreds if not thousands of eyewitnesses - it was a plane. Edited July 19, 2014 by Hillonearth 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ned Nederlander Posted July 19, 2014 Share Posted July 19, 2014 Sorry if its been posted already Why would it have been posted already - P&B has it's fair share of roasters but very few are wired to a f'cking Mars bar like you !! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AberdeenBud Posted July 19, 2014 Share Posted July 19, 2014 Has Jock001 ruled out pilot error yet? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jagfox Posted July 19, 2014 Share Posted July 19, 2014 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~~~ Posted July 19, 2014 Share Posted July 19, 2014 (edited) Speaking of conspiracy theories... Alex Jones, never far from one, well from his website anyways Edited July 19, 2014 by Enrico Annoni 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Romeo Posted July 19, 2014 Share Posted July 19, 2014 I think some people think explosions they see in movies are the real deal and entirely accurate. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ned Nederlander Posted July 19, 2014 Share Posted July 19, 2014 It all but proves that what ever crashed in the field in Pennsylvania on that fateful day wasn't a plane and that the government were covering something up on the day. You're going to have to elaborate I'm afraid ! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ned Nederlander Posted July 19, 2014 Share Posted July 19, 2014 You only need to look at the pics of the 2 crash sites for it to be plainly obvious!!! So you intend to explain your point by having me Google images of aircraft crash sites !? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LinkinFighter Posted July 19, 2014 Share Posted July 19, 2014 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dorlomin Posted July 19, 2014 Share Posted July 19, 2014 Supposedly this is linked to Putin's visit to South American nations next week and a spate of high ranking bankers all connected to the JP Morgan group and the Rothchilds(sp?) commiting suicide over the last 6 months... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MONKMAN Posted July 19, 2014 Share Posted July 19, 2014 (edited) It all but proves that what ever crashed in the field in Pennsylvania on that fateful day wasn't a plane and that the government were covering something up on the day. So what happened to the plane, and the passengers it was carrying? Edited July 19, 2014 by MONKMAN 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ned Nederlander Posted July 19, 2014 Share Posted July 19, 2014 Yes sir - i CBA posting the pics maself a've got work to do!! Having a busy day as it is but still enough time to blow the lid on a conspiracy theory, thats the sort of guy i am One was hit by a missile at 33,000 feet whilst the other was hit by the ground at zero feet ... the Ukraine crash site is, and of course should be, totally and absolutely different from the Flight 93 crash site Your claim that this crash somehow "proves that what ever crashed in the field in Pennsylvania on that fateful day wasn't a plane" is complete hokum. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ned Nederlander Posted July 19, 2014 Share Posted July 19, 2014 I admit to being a bit OTT but it sheds light on the grey areas of the 9/11 official explanations. Surely a plane that was hit by a missile 33000 feet in the air would leave less of a wreck than a plane that wasn't hit by anything and just crash landed? surely there would be more left of the 9/11 plane? What 'grey areas' ? the aircraft was high-jacked and subsequently crashed - if you believe that something else crashed into that field then so be it but please accept a hearty and enjoyable point-and-laugh at your expense from my general direction. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MuckleMoo Posted July 19, 2014 Share Posted July 19, 2014 I admit to being a bit OTT but it sheds light on the grey areas of the 9/11 official explanations. Surely a plane that was hit by a missile 33000 feet in the air would leave less of a wreck than a plane that wasn't hit by anything and just crash landed? surely there would be more left of the 9/11 plane? I'm not sure the 9/11 plane 'crashed landed' as such. My understanding was that it was flown into the ground like a dart at nearly 600 mph. As a result the wreckage was very localised. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.