Magoo9uk Posted July 23, 2014 Share Posted July 23, 2014 Not another chancer trying to make a few quid by pandering to the obsessives? I thought Phil & co had saturated that market? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shiltrum Posted July 26, 2014 Share Posted July 26, 2014 Not another chancer trying to make a few quid by pandering to the obsessives? I thought Phil & co had saturated that market? A gap in the market opened up with the Paranoia Shift he just had to exploit this as failure to do so would have been costly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jock001 Posted July 26, 2014 Share Posted July 26, 2014 Google the guys user name or the book title to find his blog. Apparently he used to be a schoolteacher and is now not a well man. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paulthejakeywifebeater Posted July 26, 2014 Share Posted July 26, 2014 Why do companies house have rangers marked down as being liquidated and starting as a newco in 2012 under a very similar name? Why are the scottish courts showing rangers fc ( the club and company ) in the process of being liquidated? Why are rangers if they are still the same club not hiring lawyers etc and challenging this decision? Why are the shareholders who bought into old rangers ( the club ) not challenging in a court of law as to why they lost all their money if the club is still the same? Who said rangers are a brand new club? I demand to know who these peepul are!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.