Bully Wee Villa Posted May 11, 2016 Share Posted May 11, 2016 Has this QT clip of Alex Salmond in 1987 been posted anywhere yet? It's just astonishing. Just seen this. Surprised to spot David Bowie in the audience. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrewDon Posted May 12, 2016 Share Posted May 12, 2016 "I don't accept that our manifesto was rejected."Yes, Kezia, it's the voters who are wrong. Christ. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StreetwiseHercules Posted May 12, 2016 Share Posted May 12, 2016 Fluffy Mundell really suits his beard. First questioner was quite full of himself but handled the spotlight well. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StreetwiseHercules Posted May 12, 2016 Share Posted May 12, 2016 The absolute beel and seethe thatunionists have about the idea of a second referendum is delicious. The prospect of Independence haunts them and so may it until it comes. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StreetwiseHercules Posted May 12, 2016 Share Posted May 12, 2016 Merryn Somerset who???? Being given this platform why? I'd ban journalists from Question Time. We get quite enough of journalists asking journalists what they think on TV. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sparky88 Posted May 12, 2016 Share Posted May 12, 2016 Nats taking solace in their 'BBC Bias' comfort blanket there. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mjw Posted May 12, 2016 Share Posted May 12, 2016 Nats taking solace in their 'BBC Bias' comfort blanket there.Nats plural or one guy in the audience? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HTG Posted May 12, 2016 Share Posted May 12, 2016 Nats taking solace in their 'BBC Bias' comfort blanket there. Your manifesto wasn't rejected ... Just you settle for dealing with your non rejection. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scary Bear Posted May 12, 2016 Share Posted May 12, 2016 Fluffy Mundell really suits his beard. First questioner was quite full of himself but handled the spotlight well. Has Mundell lost weight or is it just the beard? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Lambies Doos Posted May 12, 2016 Share Posted May 12, 2016 "I don't accept that our manifesto was rejected." Yes, Kezia, it's the voters who are wrong. Christ. Is she still leader Oh dug... what u doing 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jamaldo Posted May 12, 2016 Share Posted May 12, 2016 (edited) "Blow them up" Edited May 12, 2016 by Jamaldo 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrewDon Posted May 12, 2016 Share Posted May 12, 2016 Tremendous explanation of how arguments work, there. I had always wondered, so pleased to have it clarified. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pandarilla Posted May 12, 2016 Share Posted May 12, 2016 Tremendous explanation of how arguments work, there. I had always wondered, so pleased to have it clarified. She was a tad childish. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Southside Hibee Posted May 12, 2016 Share Posted May 12, 2016 Jim Sillars makes a compelling case for a Brexit. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Southside Hibee Posted May 12, 2016 Share Posted May 12, 2016 Jim Sillars makes a compelling case for a Brexit. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BerwickMad Posted May 12, 2016 Share Posted May 12, 2016 This named person scheme sounds utterly bizarre. I've been told at work I could be one but I had no idea what it was. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mjw Posted May 12, 2016 Share Posted May 12, 2016 Dimbleby is turning into the sixth panel member here. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
strichener Posted May 12, 2016 Share Posted May 12, 2016 This named person scheme sounds utterly bizarre. I've been told at work I could be one but I had no idea what it was. It is really bizarre if you are ignorant on how it is intended to work. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bob the tank Posted May 12, 2016 Share Posted May 12, 2016 This named person scheme sounds utterly bizarre. I've been told at work I could be one but I had no idea what it was. The definition has been all over the Internet for months, and seems entirely practical. Of course that doesn't stop the proposal being monstered by the paedo protection, no surrender, no referendum party 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrewDon Posted May 12, 2016 Share Posted May 12, 2016 She's been anonymous tonight, and I don't think she's a particularly effective politician, but credit where credit's due for Dugdale's answer on the Named Person. It's not something I feel particularly strongly about either way, but that struck me as the most sensible and balanced response of any panellist. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.