Jump to content

Question Time


Elixir

Recommended Posts

 
So why are large swathes of Northern England more ignorant than others?
Perhaps because these large swathes are post-industrial areas where the only growth has been in poverty and all its associated social problems. Against that backdrop everything suffers, including educational attainment. A comparison of say Burnley with Beaconsfield would throw up some stark discrepancies.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You've answered your own question - Scotland has the SNP to represent the country's interests, no part of England has similar. And I'd disagree that England is not a two-party nation; it is indeed that with the Lib Dems no more than an occasional pressure relief valve.


I think that England is not even a two-party nation. When New Labour was around they weren’t called Red Tories for nothing, it was the lesser of two evils with both parties giving absolutely zero fucks about the interest of anyone outside the South of England. There is no creditable party to vote for if you want away from the capitalist dream.


Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, O'Kelly Isley III said:
17 hours ago, Boo Khaki said:
This is fair enough, but why is there an apparent discrepancy between the north of England, and for arguments sake, Scotland, in terms of seeing through Brexit for what it is?
Both areas suffered because of Thatcher, both areas have rejected an exposed and diminished Labour party, so why are Scots overwhelmingly rejecting Brexit while their counterparts in North England are baying for it like a pack of especially masochistic dogs?
Scotland has the SNP as an alternative, but England isn't a two party system. There's no law that states that if you can't support Labour any longer, you simply must become a Tory backer and/or back Brexit. I recognise that a lot of those people on QT the other night will never vote Tory, but still, why are they so in favour of a Tory-driven misadventure that will only result in further harming their already poor prospects?
You can be thoroughly fed up with Labour, have an ingrained aversion to voting Tory, and STILL see Brexit for the pile of shite it is. I just don't get why these folk are apparently incapable of seeing through it. They have access to the same info as people elsewhere in the UK, so it's not as if there's an excuse for being ill-informed either.
I really dislike it when folk imply that all Brexit 'Leave' voters are simply thick, as you're dismissing over half the people who expressed a preference as stupid. That seems totally outlandish to me. I do think that voting 'Leave' when you have no idea what form leaving will take is a colossally stupid act, but it doesn't make the voters themselves stupid people. Sadly, I can only conclude that there's a huge amount of cognitive dissonance going on, and people's ignorance of the reality of the EU and what it actually does, makes the EU a handy scapegoat thanks to latent xenophobia. I take no pleasure at all in saying that, but I honestly can't see any other excuse or reason for the behaviour.

You've answered your own question - Scotland has the SNP to represent the country's interests, no part of England has similar. And I'd disagree that England is not a two-party nation; it is indeed that with the Lib Dems no more than an occasional pressure relief valve.

All the main parties in Scotland campaigned for Remain. Scotland does not have an identity crisis. Scottish people are Scottish.

IMO, by comparison, people in the north of England do have an identity crisis going on. What does British mean if the Scots don't want to be British? What does English mean if you always have to add 'north of'? "I'll tell you what, lad, I'm not bluddy European!"  Something like that.  

Also they all read newspapers that tell them to hate the EU.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Watched it tonight for the first time in ages.
Mairead McGuinness seemed to be the voice of reason,
Totally out of place, actually saying both sides have a degree of right and we should meet in the middle! Can't remember the last time I heard anyone say something like that on qt, it's alway total polarity. I've applied for next week's audience and that was one of my questions, why do 2 people with very similar lives have to have such polar views when 95%of their lives and views must be the same?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, JamesP_81 said:
1 hour ago, oldbitterandgrumpy said:
Watched it tonight for the first time in ages.
Mairead McGuinness seemed to be the voice of reason,

Totally out of place, actually saying both sides have a degree of right and we should meet in the middle! Can't remember the last time I heard anyone say something like that on qt, it's alway total polarity. I've applied for next week's audience and that was one of my questions, why do 2 people with very similar lives have to have such polar views when 95%of their lives and views must be the same?

Dream on mate. Polarity is the way things are going right now. Mairead was on the panel 

 as an outsider, which meant she could be a bit more open and honest in her opinions, no party line to tow. 

In the age of Twitter and Facebook there is  only right and wrong.

Both sides have a degree of right?  Erm . . . aye, right. 

 

 

Edited by oldbitterandgrumpy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dream on mate. Polarity is the way things are going right now. Mairead was on the panel 
 as an outsider, which meant she could be a bit more open and honest in her opinions, no party line to tow. 
In the age of Twitter and Facebook there are only right and wrong.
Both sides have a degree of right?  Erm . . . aye, right. 
 
 
I would say you are being totally bleak and depressive if It wasn't actually true [emoji17]
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, what's the relevance?
 
TP is basically a mirror held up to society that proves people are on a downward spiral of hate and self loathing. We have lost our balance of light and dark. as its the dark that drives our intrigue so tv is skewed towards our darker sides and becomes further and further from where we should be. This I feel is how our politics is going, either back or white, nothing in between.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, JamesP_81 said:
8 minutes ago, oldbitterandgrumpy said:
No, what's the relevance?
 

TP is basically a mirror held up to society that proves people are on a downward spiral of hate and self loathing. We have lost our balance of light and dark. as its the dark that drives our intrigue so tv is skewed towards our darker sides and becomes further and further from where we should be. This I feel is how our politics is going, either back or white, nothing in between.

Populism.

If it knocks on your door, don't open your door. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, JamesP_81 said:
24 minutes ago, oldbitterandgrumpy said:
No, what's the relevance?
 

TP is basically a mirror held up to society that proves people are on a downward spiral of hate and self loathing. We have lost our balance of light and dark. as its the dark that drives our intrigue so tv is skewed towards our darker sides and becomes further and further from where we should be. This I feel is how our politics is going, either back or white, nothing in between.

First World problems. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...