Jump to content

The 2016 US Presidential Election


Adamski

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 5.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Associated Press claiming more than half the people Clinton met in her time as Secretary of State were donors to the Clinton Foundation.

The Republican Party must be truly gutted they don't even have a competent candidate. This election was an open goal.

I still think even after everything he's said and done that if he had the same resources as Clinton, Trump may actually have ended up winning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Paco said:

Associated Press claiming more than half the people Clinton met in her time as Secretary of State were donors to the Clinton Foundation.

The Republican Party must be truly gutted they don't even have a competent candidate. This election was an open goal.

I still think even after everything he's said and done that if he had the same resources as Clinton, Trump may actually have ended up winning.

The Foundation is a charity, mainly working in the 3rd World. None of its money goes to the Clintons or Hilary's campaign. Trump's not losing because he's short of cash, although he seems very unwilling to spend his own, every time he travels in his own jet or uses one of his hotels for a rally he bills the campaign. He's losing because he targeted too narrow a demographic and alienated too wide a one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, welshbairn said:

The Foundation is a charity, mainly working in the 3rd World. None of its money goes to the Clintons or Hilary's campaign. Trump's not losing because he's short of cash, although he seems very unwilling to spend his own, every time he travels in his own jet or uses one of his hotels for a rally he bills the campaign. He's losing because he targeted too narrow a demographic and alienated too wide a one.

Also because he's a rotten, racist gobshite.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Foundation is a charity, mainly working in the 3rd World. None of its money goes to the Clintons or Hilary's campaign. Trump's not losing because he's short of cash, although he seems very unwilling to spend his own, every time he travels in his own jet or uses one of his hotels for a rally he bills the campaign. He's losing because he targeted too narrow a demographic and alienated too wide a one.



I get that, but when over 50% of the people you make appointments with are contributing to your charity that suggests a pattern of someone, somewhere suggesting the best way to get some face time with the Secretary of State is to give her money (charitable or otherwise). Which is corruption.

And yeah, don't get me wrong - Trump's an outright buffoon. All I was really saying is in spite of everything he's said and done, in spite of Clinton's monumental lead in resource and spend, he's still not 100% out of it. Which speaks volumes for Clinton.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, dogmc said:


Aye a real meeting of minds there....very diverse crowd in the background too

Stop being racist, please.

44 minutes ago, kilbowie2002 said:


You know who else had rallies? Hitler.

Dont get your point, farage is a p***k, trump is a p***k. meeting of p***ks.

 

:lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The President Elect has weighed in on the "NFL player not standing for the National Anthem" scandal by telling him to go back where he came from "find a country that works better for him".

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-37223377



No a day goes past that Colin Kaepernick isn't proven to be completely correct.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tbh, not standing for your national anthem because of growing racial tensions is quite shan. You can't blame you're entire nation because of the racist, bigoted views of morons. Scotland has plenty of them, but then again, they stand for GSTQ, not our own countries national anthem...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, oaksoft said:

Your opinion is worth precisely what I paid for it.

Someone's cage has been rattled hasn't it?

Makes you wonder which of the three things I mentioned you're getting defensive over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, kilbowie2002 said:


I personally dont stand for gstq as is my right, I fail to see why the chap as much as i disagree with him is getting so much grief.

no fan of GSTQ but when exactly do you get the opportunity not to stand for it??  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, Dipped Flake said:

no fan of GSTQ but when exactly do you get the opportunity not to stand for it??  

When watching the football on the telly?

I wonder if the Yanks jump out of their chair at home when the Star Spangled banner is played at televised events.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't stand for any national anthems. Outdated shite.


I got physically threatened for not standing for the Irish Anthem in a Dublin pub during the troubles. I stood up ramrod straight pretty sharpish.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...