GingerSaint Posted March 8, 2016 Share Posted March 8, 2016 I'll vote for 1 IR spot too then. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul Marnie Posted March 8, 2016 Share Posted March 8, 2016 IR slot would be great; 1 probably enough for the roster sizes. I'd suggest deciding on keepers before the draft; maybe a week beforehand or so? That way if you want your draft picks you have to give up players on your roster or if you don't want them they're tradable commodities for the future. Adds some depth to the pool of players in the yearly draft as well. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BishyTON Posted March 8, 2016 Share Posted March 8, 2016 Yeah totally agree re an IR slot. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shibuya Posted March 8, 2016 Share Posted March 8, 2016 Sorry, meant to say. Aye to IR. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dee4Life1893 Posted March 8, 2016 Share Posted March 8, 2016 (edited) dee4life was talking about packing it in last year, dunno if he still is. Ps, I'm defo leaning towards at least one IR spto Aye, f**k that! I won this thing last year. Still think we should have a few more roster spaces. But I understand this is a bit different and that has a certain charm. Defo yes to an IR slot (or two) ETA: f**k me, a 1st and a 3rd for fat Eddie. I suppose the 3rd is pretty much worthless. Edited March 8, 2016 by Dee4Life1893 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Brightside Posted March 8, 2016 Share Posted March 8, 2016 Aye, f**k that! I won this thing last year. Still think we should have a few more roster spaces. But I understand this is a bit different and that has a certain charm. Defo yes to an IR slot (or two) ETA: f**k me, a 1st and a 3rd for fat Eddie. I suppose the 3rd is pretty much worthless. Glory hunter 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dee4Life1893 Posted March 8, 2016 Share Posted March 8, 2016 (edited) Sorry I just hit "Accept" on a trade when I was just making a comment. Dunno if it went thru. EDIT: Doesn't look like it did. Nothing to see here. Edited March 8, 2016 by Dee4Life1893 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul Marnie Posted March 8, 2016 Share Posted March 8, 2016 ETA: f**k me, a 1st and a 3rd for fat Eddie. I suppose the 3rd is pretty much worthless. Fingers crossed he's not so fat come September; seems to be shedding the weight in the last month, hopefully keeps it up. Contract year as well; could be nice...as long as Forte stays the hell away from GB! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silvio Posted March 9, 2016 Share Posted March 9, 2016 I vote for IR. I've got three QB's - Romo, Winston and Mariotta. Happy to listen to offers for any 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dee4Life1893 Posted March 9, 2016 Share Posted March 9, 2016 I vote for IR. I've got three QB's - Romo, Winston and Mariotta. Happy to listen to offers for any Trade sent. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Brightside Posted March 9, 2016 Share Posted March 9, 2016 Btw could we all take a look at what team of the two I posted yesterday we think is better and let me know. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steelmen Posted March 9, 2016 Share Posted March 9, 2016 I am in..... really wondering if i took the right team now. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dee4Life1893 Posted March 9, 2016 Share Posted March 9, 2016 Btw could we all take a look at what team of the two I posted yesterday we think is better and let me know. Probably the 1st one. But they are both bad. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul Marnie Posted March 9, 2016 Share Posted March 9, 2016 Btw could we all take a look at what team of the two I posted yesterday we think is better and let me know. Team 1 - 2 QB1's...albeit ageing ones, 1 startable RB, 3 startable WRs, 2 lower end TEs Team 2 - No QBs, 1; maybe 2 startable RBs, 2 solid WR2's, 1 potential TE1 and 2 decent DSTs I think Team 1 is slightly better 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Brightside Posted March 9, 2016 Share Posted March 9, 2016 I am in..... really wondering if i took the right team now.I drew them at random. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stewbo Posted March 12, 2016 Share Posted March 12, 2016 Btw could we all take a look at what team of the two I posted yesterday we think is better and let me know. I heard a really good idea for situations like this on a podcast last week. Basically release all the players and extra picks from both teams and let those two draft from the player pool (might have to be done pen and paper). That way the teams end up a bit more balanced and nobody can say they got a worse team...? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BishyTON Posted March 12, 2016 Share Posted March 12, 2016 I heard a really good idea for situations like this on a podcast last week. Basically release all the players and extra picks from both teams and let those two draft from the player pool (might have to be done pen and paper). That way the teams end up a bit more balanced and nobody can say they got a worse team...? That is a great idea imo. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul Marnie Posted March 12, 2016 Share Posted March 12, 2016 Would this negate all their rookie picks? Regardless; seems a bit fairer. One team has at least 4 guys that won't play in the NFL again. That said...Josh Gordon is still in the FA pool and I'm maybe after him 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BishyTON Posted March 12, 2016 Share Posted March 12, 2016 They would only be drafting for the players on the two teams I would suggest. The top free agents have to be in the actual draft or it becomes pretty pointless after the first ten picks or so. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GingerSaint Posted March 12, 2016 Share Posted March 12, 2016 They would only be drafting for the players on the two teams I would suggest. The top free agents have to be in the actual draft or it becomes pretty pointless after the first ten picks or so. He means how would we decide who gets which draft slot. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.