Jump to content

Andy Murray The Greatest and General Tennis Chat


Bryan

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Loki said:

No it didn’t. It started the week it was meant to.  The French Open pushed back one week.  The grass season was pushed back a number of years ago to these weeks.

 

Just checked and it was 2015 it changed, so this is the 5th championships with the later start. I'd thought they changed it much more recently. I'm blaming old age.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Nightmare said:

He's never been an easy watch, has he?

Dunno, all three titles he's won at Wimbledon were in straight sets, as was his ATP finals win. When he won the Davis Cup he only dropped 2 sets in his 8 singles matches, and none in the semi or final.

Not to say he hasn't regularly put us through the mill but he's hardly Tim Henman!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, GordonS said:

Just checked and it was 2015 it changed, so this is the 5th championships with the later start. I'd thought they changed it much more recently. I'm blaming old age.

**Andy Murray voice** 6th championships 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, GordonS said:

Dunno, all three titles he's won at Wimbledon were in straight sets, as was his ATP finals win. When he won the Davis Cup he only dropped 2 sets in his 8 singles matches, and none in the semi or final.

Not to say he hasn't regularly put us through the mill but he's hardly Tim Henman!

That first Wimbledon title (not the Olympics) was one of the toughest watches, even if it was straight sets!

You're probably right in that we've watched an awful lot of straightforward wins in Andy's career, and have definitely been spoiled by him. Doesn't mean he hasn't chucked a few awful games/sets/matches in there along the way. More understandable today than it was back when he was in his prime, mind you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Nightmare said:

That first Wimbledon title (not the Olympics) was one of the toughest watches, even if it was straight sets!

You're probably right in that we've watched an awful lot of straightforward wins in Andy's career, and have definitely been spoiled by him. Doesn't mean he hasn't chucked a few awful games/sets/matches in there along the way. More understandable today than it was back when he was in his prime, mind you.

Even in those title wins he was two sets down to Verdasco in the QF.  In 2016 he chucked away a two set lead against Tsonga in the QF.  In his US Open win he was a set and two breaks down to Cilic in the last 16.  
 

In the ATP finals he was match point down to Raonic in the semi final.  Also took more than 3.5 hours to get past Nishikori.

He very rarely won the first set in Slam semi finals.  I think the Murray roller coaster has always been there.  I think his struggles in matches are the norm.  He isn’t as good as Federer, Djokovic or Nadal and I feel he gets judged against their standards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Loki said:

Even in those title wins he was two sets down to Verdasco in the QF.  In 2016 he chucked away a two set lead against Tsonga in the QF.  In his US Open win he was a set and two breaks down to Cilic in the last 16.  
 

In the ATP finals he was match point down to Raonic in the semi final.  Also took more than 3.5 hours to get past Nishikori.

He very rarely won the first set in Slam semi finals.  I think the Murray roller coaster has always been there.  I think his struggles in matches are the norm.  He isn’t as good as Federer, Djokovic or Nadal and I feel he gets judged against their standards.

I think this is probably the key. It feels like he's had a lot of clangers, but I'd imagine if we'd watched every match in the career of a Berdych, Tsonga or Cilic who I'd say sit in the tier below Murray, they've probably been even worse in that regard.

It's been a privilege, though, even if we've occasionally had to put up with him labouring past the likes of Viktor Troicki in the 3rd round at the French.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Nightmare said:

That first Wimbledon title (not the Olympics) was one of the toughest watches, even if it was straight sets!

You're probably right in that we've watched an awful lot of straightforward wins in Andy's career, and have definitely been spoiled by him. Doesn't mean he hasn't chucked a few awful games/sets/matches in there along the way. More understandable today than it was back when he was in his prime, mind you.

I think it's because we're so invested. When you watch the matches again he was always ahead of Federer in 2012 (and Djokovic in the semis), and of Djokovic in 2013. But when he lost those three match points in 2013 we all thought he was going to lose!

He usually coasted through the early rounds as easily as the big 3, but yes, especially in a 5 setter he could have a shitty half hour and have to dig himself back out.

Never anything like that third set tonight though. I can't recall ever seeing anyone lose a set from 5-0 without being injured - and definitely not to go on and win the match.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think my favourite laboured victories in slams was his 2016 run to the French Open final.  Two sets down to Stepanek in Round One and the two sets to one down to Mathiaus Bourgue in Round 2.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Loki said:

Even in those title wins he was two sets down to Verdasco in the QF.  In 2016 he chucked away a two set lead against Tsonga in the QF.  In his US Open win he was a set and two breaks down to Cilic in the last 16.  
 

In the ATP finals he was match point down to Raonic in the semi final.  Also took more than 3.5 hours to get past Nishikori.

He very rarely won the first set in Slam semi finals.  I think the Murray roller coaster has always been there.  I think his struggles in matches are the norm.  He isn’t as good as Federer, Djokovic or Nadal and I feel he gets judged against their standards.

To me those matches don't really lead to criticisms, they show his strength. He's never had the natural talent of the big 3 and really he never had much more than the chasing pack. Good players having a really good match were always going to trouble him. He didn't have a surface on which he could stand out, unlike the other 3. But he had more determination not to lose than anyone else on the tour, and nobody trained harder either.

His flakes cost him sets but rarely matches. From his first QF in a slam, at Wimbledon in 2008 only once in any slam did he lose before the last 16 until his injury in 2017. Only 6 times in 36 slams did he not make the quarters at least, and it happened only once in 6 years 2011-2016 (to Kevin Anderson at the US Open. It's incredible consistency. You look at Wawrinka with his 3 slams, he has nothing like that record.

I've always thought the distinctions among the big 4 were that Federer was the best player, Djokovic the best athlete, Nadal had the most will to win and Murray most hated to lose. Very Scottish tbh.

Three slams from 11 finals, two Olympics, a Davis Cup, an ATP Finals, world number 1 (for the 14th most weeks), 7 of the 9 Masters titles, in the toughest era ever in men's tennis, and unquestionably cut short at the top by injury. We've seen him beat Federer on grass, Djokovic on hard court and Nadal on clay. It's been a privilege to follow.

How Basilashvili is feeling right now:

215133-2.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, GordonS said:

Just checked and it was 2015 it changed, so this is the 5th championships with the later start. I'd thought they changed it much more recently. I'm blaming old age.

First week of Wimbledon used to be the last week of school. Second week was in the Kilmarnock fair and we'd be watching it on holiday somewhere. In the case of the Borg v McEnroe tie break, the window of Radio Rentals in Monmouth. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It’s a shame to me that there doesn’t seem to be any prospect of a Murray brothers partnership with Andy switching to concentrate on doubles which should be friendlier on his body. I think they could play together for 3-4 years and win multiple grand slams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It’s a shame to me that there doesn’t seem to be any prospect of a Murray brothers partnership with Andy switching to concentrate on doubles which should be friendlier on his body. I think they could play together for 3-4 years and win multiple grand slams.
They could join up but remember that Jamie is actually the older brother & has just partnered back up with Soares who he's won all his GS double titles with.

JM will be on the hunt for a couple more GS doubles titles before he retires & much more likely to do so with an established partner he's won slams with before.

Andy seems determined to stay playing singles so [emoji2369]
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Andy has often produced Wimbledon roller coasters.... Gasquet, Bagdades(i know spelt wrong), warkinka(prob spelt wing), Verdasco.(maybe spelt wrong) and Nalbandian( think spelling ok), springs to mind.
Lost that last one but very young at time...

I’d add in his loss to Roddick in 09 and his win vs Janowicz in 13 on the list of mental games he was involved in. Not quite as mental as the Gasquet one right enough.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...