stonedsailor Posted May 5, 2016 Share Posted May 5, 2016 Were it written by a diddy it would be "Your so vein": We're it written by a *** I'm convinced it would be "ure sow vane" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted May 5, 2016 Share Posted May 5, 2016 We're it written by a *** I'm convinced it would be "ure sow vane" By a what? Type those three letters so we can all understand, please. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stonedsailor Posted May 5, 2016 Share Posted May 5, 2016 By a what? Type those three letters so we can all understand, please. *** Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted May 5, 2016 Share Posted May 5, 2016 *** There you go. Some of us don't hide behind the swear filter, chap. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stonedsailor Posted May 5, 2016 Share Posted May 5, 2016 There you go. Some of us don't hide behind the swear filter, chap. As you well know Police Scotland deemed the word to be acceptable under the offensive behaviour and threatening communications act in their brief prior to the Glasgow derby match, I can't help it if Div won't keep up with the currant political viewpoint. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted May 5, 2016 Share Posted May 5, 2016 Between 2001 and 2010, Rangers paid a total of £47.65m in to their Employee Benefit Trust. Details of the amounts paid in to the trust were declared in the club's annual accounts. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-glasgow-west-18169502 apology? B B B B but we were told that it was a secret and kept hidden....... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stonedsailor Posted May 5, 2016 Share Posted May 5, 2016 B B B B but we were told that it was a secret and kept hidden....... Shame Rangers still died despite this, eh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted May 5, 2016 Share Posted May 5, 2016 Shame Rangers still died despite this, eh? Not at sea? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stonedsailor Posted May 5, 2016 Share Posted May 5, 2016 They couldnae even cheat right the fking losers. Comma needed between "right" and "the". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted May 5, 2016 Share Posted May 5, 2016 ive not implied it today, ive simply stated the fact that the amount paid into ebts was declared every year they were in operation in the accounts Yes, but doing so, did not in any way mitigate against the fact that football rules were broken in the registration of players. That's where the 'cheating' charge comes from and that's what prompted this latest round of the discussion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stonedsailor Posted May 5, 2016 Share Posted May 5, 2016 Not at sea? Travelling home, sweetheart. Still at the B&B? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted May 5, 2016 Share Posted May 5, 2016 Yes, but doing so, did not in any way mitigate against the fact that football rules were broken in the registration of players. That's where the 'cheating' charge comes from and that's what prompted this latest round of the discussion. Officially an administrative error. Travelling home, sweetheart. Still at the B&B? Aye, the vital sparks a grand ship, best ship in the West. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stonedsailor Posted May 5, 2016 Share Posted May 5, 2016 Officially an administrative error. Aye, the vital sparks a grand ship, best ship in the West. Vital spark is razor blades by now, run up a beach in India and stripped like Vicky the Viking with a nostril full of coke and poppers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nacho Posted May 5, 2016 Share Posted May 5, 2016 Taken from the same page. BBC Scotland has also seen evidence, which was submitted to a court, suggesting that 53 Rangers players and staff had side-letters giving undertakings to fund their sub-trusts with cash. According to the Scottish Football Association's registration rules, payments received by a player solely relating to his playing activities must be fully recorded and declared, otherwise the player has been improperly registered. If a player is deemed to be improperly registered, the norm is for his team to forfeit any match in which he has participated. doesnt change the fact that you were wrong and i was right as usual Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted May 5, 2016 Share Posted May 5, 2016 Vital spark is razor blades by now, run up a beach in India and stripped like Vicky the Viking with a nostril full of coke and poppers Not in front of young wizzy, he'll be off asking his mummy what all of that means. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stonedsailor Posted May 5, 2016 Share Posted May 5, 2016 Not in front of young wizzy, he'll be off asking his mummy what all of that means. Wizzy kens fine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nacho Posted May 5, 2016 Share Posted May 5, 2016 Yes, but doing so, did not in any way mitigate against the fact that football rules were broken in the registration of players. That's where the 'cheating' charge comes from and that's what prompted this latest round of the discussion. which we were punished for, the facts are they were declared evey year in the accounts Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nacho Posted May 5, 2016 Share Posted May 5, 2016 Yes, but doing so, did not in any way mitigate against the fact that football rules were broken in the registration of players. That's where the 'cheating' charge comes from and that's what prompted this latest round of the discussion. the cheating charge comes from morons like yourself, who seem to think we should be unfairly punished for a minor issue, that gained us zero advantage as the players would all have come anyway, celtic did eactly the same for their players with the film scheme, and just as many of them are bieng chased by the tax man for similar amounts Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stonedsailor Posted May 5, 2016 Share Posted May 5, 2016 which we were punished for, the facts are they were declared evey year in the accounts Who was punished?This is a leading question. Take your time and think about your answer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted May 5, 2016 Share Posted May 5, 2016 if Div won't keep up with the currant political viewpoint. Swear filter be damned. If you want to use a word then do it rather than hiding behind Div's pinny. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.