Jump to content

nice news story


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 51
  • Created
  • Last Reply
So the problem with this ruling is two-fold.

 

Firstly, it sends out a very clear message that stealing is fine as long as you are hungry.

 

Secondly, it doesn't even attempt to deal with the actual problem which is why exactly are people starving in the streets of Italy in the first place in 2016. It doesn't say whether this starvation is self-caused for whatever reason or whether there is a fundamental problem in Italy.

 

Maybe someone can explain exactly why this ruling makes Europe a better place than the UK. We don't typically have people starving in the street. We have a welfare system and foodbanks which essentially take care of that. Perhaps not ideal but at least we don't have starvation. Maybe Italy doesn't have that safety net. I have no idea.

All I know is that we probably need to give credit where its due.

stealing is okay if you're hungry, that wasn't a mistake that they sent out that message.

The rest is hardly the job of the court. You're a bitter old man. And what starvation would be self Caused? We'renot ttalking about bobby sands here

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It would be nice rulings like this weren't necessary. I somehow doubt this was the guy's finest hour.

 

No surprise that Oaksoft thinks people should fight against nature and allow themselves to starve, however   :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It would be nice rulings like this weren't necessary. I somehow doubt this was the guy's finest hour.

 

No surprise that Oaksoft thinks people should fight against nature and allow themselves to starve, however   :rolleyes:

every human being has the right not to go hungry

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think we can all agree that this guy doesn't deserve to be prosecuted here but that doesn't make it okay to go around stealing things. Shops have to protect their business.

I would much prefer if some happy medium was reached

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fair play to them. Europe just knows better, it'sthe centre of ddemocracy and civilisation and the most highly developed continent on earth, I'dmmuch rather be governed by Brussels than London.

 

Is this 1880 and are you campaigning for the colonisation of Africa?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I optimistically disagree that it is not solving the problem (sort of). 

 

I believe the judgement will cause a concentration of minds about how to come up with a solution. Once the golden calf of private property is threatened people will start to take notice.

 

The right to life has to over ride property rights.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I optimistically disagree that it is not solving the problem (sort of).

I believe the judgement will cause a concentration of minds about how to come up with a solution. Once the golden calf of private property is threatened people will start to take notice.

The right to life has to over ride property rights.

I don't think anyone disagrees with the notion that the right to life takes primacy over other rights, including property. The issue is that the mere existence of a supermarket's property rights doesn't deny anyone a right to life. It's the guy's absence of property that puts him in desperate need. That's a broader social problem and not a justification for depriving any specific person or shop of their property but it is a justification for things like taxation, a compassionate welfare system and giving prosecutors and judges the flexibility not to punish anyone caught stealing in a time of desperate need.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think anyone disagrees with the notion that the right to life takes primacy over other rights, including property. The issue is that the mere existence of a supermarket's property rights doesn't deny anyone a right to life. It's the guy's absence of property that puts him in desperate need. That's a broader social problem and not a justification for depriving any specific person or shop of their property but it is a justification for things like taxation, a compassionate welfare system and giving prosecutors and judges the flexibility not to punish anyone caught stealing in a time of desperate need.

all property is theft, kill the masters. John Swinney told me that

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wait, is Swinney from the far left of the SNP? I'd heard he was a bit out of touch with other SNP MSPs and MPs but I'd always assumed that to mean he was more of a centre-right tartan Tory type.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wait, is Swinney from the far left of the SNP? I'd heard he was a bit out of touch with other SNP MSPs and MPs but I'd always assumed that to mean he was more of a centre-right tartan Tory type.

I dinnae care.

As long as he supports Independence then I'll vote for him.

Easy peasy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fair play to them. Europe just knows better, it'sthe centre of ddemocracy and civilisation and the most highly developed continent on earth, I'dmmuch rather be governed by Brussels than London.

London is in Europe meight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...