Monkey Tennis Posted July 24, 2020 Share Posted July 24, 2020 14 minutes ago, thepundit said: Would need to see the rules on glorified training sessions before commenting on the Rangers B vs Dundee Utd game. I can only assume Rangers didn’t think it was subject to the same rules Perfectly reasonable. Most folk surely recognise that the virus tends only to target 1st team players. 13 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sortmeout Posted July 24, 2020 Share Posted July 24, 2020 1 hour ago, IggyStooge said: There are many things to slag off Rangers fans at the minute; the fact that their fans are either small-minded borderline racist morons or apologists for small-minded borderline racist morons. The scamdemic stuff should not be one of them, lest you see yourself as much as a moron as the ones who slavishly follow cannon-shooting in whatever month the state allows it. That club will be used as a vessel for political gain again and everyone will meekly laugh and cough behind their stupid wee masks. Lest you forget it. At least have the decency to wait until Hate Week. Fannies. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hearthammer Posted July 24, 2020 Share Posted July 24, 2020 32 minutes ago, thepundit said: Would need to see the rules on glorified training sessions before commenting on the Rangers B vs Dundee Utd game. I can only assume Rangers didn’t think it was subject to the same rules as the ‘Well game later that day. Either that or they’ve erred big time just did what they liked and suited them because they know the SPFL/SFA are shite scared to do anything to them and the sports pages hacks will comply fully. FTFY. You're welcome. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted July 24, 2020 Share Posted July 24, 2020 Clyde surprisingly being balanced. lydeSSB The SFA and SPFL's Joint Response Group have written to three Scottish Premiership clubs about their testing protocols after bounce games were cancelled and delayed this week. Hibernian, Motherwell and Rangers have all been asked for an explanation 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thepundit Posted July 24, 2020 Share Posted July 24, 2020 (edited) 1 hour ago, Monkey Tennis said: Perfectly reasonable. Most folk surely recognise that the virus tends only to target 1st team players. One was a bounce game at Murray Park and the other was a game at Ibrox. There’s a bit of a difference between the two games regardless of who played whether it was the first team who played earlier in the day or the fringe players in the evening or vice versa. That was my point. But as I said, if Rangers believed they didn’t need test results before the first game earlier in the day and the rules state they did then they’ve obviously made an error there and deserve any punishment they get. I’ve not seen the exact wording of what was agreed but I’m sure more info will come to light over the need few days. Edited July 24, 2020 by thepundit 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Twinkle Posted July 24, 2020 Share Posted July 24, 2020 One was a bounce game at Murray Park and the other was a game at Ibrox. There’s a bit of a difference between the two games regardless of who played. That was my point. But as I said, if Rangers believed they didn’t need test results before the first game earlier in the day and the rules state they did then they’ve obviously made an error there and deserve any punishment they get. I’ve not seen the exact wording of what was agreed but I’m sure more info will come to light over the need few days. You mean you dont really give a f**k as it was mostly Sevcos youth/fringe players but all of Uniteds first team? Gotcha 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spring Onion Posted July 24, 2020 Share Posted July 24, 2020 6 minutes ago, thepundit said: One was a bounce game at Murray Park and the other was a game at Ibrox. There’s a bit of a difference between the two games regardless of who played. That was my point. What's the difference? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted July 24, 2020 Share Posted July 24, 2020 3 minutes ago, Spring Onion said: What's the difference? Isn't it obvious? You're going on as if the virus doesn't discriminate between the career trajectories of its respective victims. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted July 24, 2020 Author Share Posted July 24, 2020 4 hours ago, ropy said: Rangers hadn’t had their tests back so they delayed travelling but after watching you are right they didn’t turn up Yeah...that was the 'joke' FFS. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spring Onion Posted July 24, 2020 Share Posted July 24, 2020 11 minutes ago, Monkey Tennis said: Isn't it obvious? You're going on as if the virus doesn't discriminate between the career trajectories of its respective victims. That's how I read the response. Baffling. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thepundit Posted July 24, 2020 Share Posted July 24, 2020 4 minutes ago, Monkey Tennis said: Isn't it obvious? You're going on as if the virus doesn't discriminate between the career trajectories of its respective victims. My point had nothing to do with who played in either game. I thought it was clear but I have edited the post for the avoidance of any doubt. What I was referring to was how these games are registered with the powers that be and the possibility that Rangers maybe assumed (correctly or incorrectly) that test results weren’t required for the game at Murray Park. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pull My Strings Posted July 24, 2020 Share Posted July 24, 2020 28 minutes ago, thepundit said: One was a bounce game at Murray Park and the other was a game at Ibrox. There’s a bit of a difference between the two games regardless of who played whether it was the first team who played earlier in the day or the fringe players in the evening or vice versa. That was my point. But as I said, if Rangers believed they didn’t need test results before the first game earlier in the day and the rules state they did then they’ve obviously made an error there and deserve any punishment they get. I’ve not seen the exact wording of what was agreed but I’m sure more info will come to light over the need few days. If that's what they believed then they're not very bright. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Romeo Posted July 24, 2020 Share Posted July 24, 2020 Sevco lads and our resident shite thrower having a shocker. Not surpridsed. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dons_1988 Posted July 24, 2020 Share Posted July 24, 2020 7 minutes ago, thepundit said: My point had nothing to do with who played in either game. I thought it was clear but I have edited the post for the avoidance of any doubt. What I was referring to was how these games are registered with the powers that be and the possibility that Rangers maybe assumed (correctly or incorrectly) that test results weren’t required for the game at Murray Park. I think when it comes to the spread of a virus that recently shut down the bulk of the planet, the vague circumstances of the football match and registration with the 'powers that be' are completely fucking irrelevant. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bohemian Posted July 24, 2020 Share Posted July 24, 2020 9 minutes ago, thepundit said: My point had nothing to do with who played in either game. I thought it was clear but I have edited the post for the avoidance of any doubt. What I was referring to was how these games are registered with the powers that be and the possibility that Rangers maybe assumed (correctly or incorrectly) that test results weren’t required for the game at Murray Park. Please stop... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Golden Gordon Posted July 24, 2020 Share Posted July 24, 2020 8 minutes ago, thepundit said: My point had nothing to do with who played in either game. I thought it was clear but I have edited the post for the avoidance of any doubt. What I was referring to was how these games are registered with the powers that be and the possibility that Rangers maybe assumed (correctly or incorrectly) that test results weren’t required for the game at Murray Park. If there was any doubt, it might have been prudent to find out, to avoid any ambiguity. Can't see how test results wouldn't have been required, it's exactly the same situation, but just occurring at two different locations. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Romeo Posted July 24, 2020 Share Posted July 24, 2020 6 hours ago, Romeo said: It won't be their fault. Ta da...!!! 2 hours ago, thepundit said: I can only assume Rangers didn’t think it was subject to the same rules 14 minutes ago, thepundit said: Rangers maybe assume 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thepundit Posted July 24, 2020 Share Posted July 24, 2020 Just now, Golden Gordon said: If there was any doubt, it might have been prudent to find out, to avoid any ambiguity. Can't see how test results wouldn't have been required, it's exactly the same situation, but just occurring at two different locations. Fair point. Will need to wait and see what their reasoning was. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted July 24, 2020 Share Posted July 24, 2020 Possible defensive cover if this article is correct, with Katic and Helander injured we're thin at the back. RANGERS have agreed a deal to sign Nigeria international defender Leon Balogun. SunSport can reveal the 32 year-old centre-back will sign a two-year contract to move to Ibrox. Gers have been searching for a new stopper with Nikola Katic out injured and facing months on the sidelines. Balogun is a free agent after his contract with Brighton expired at the end of the season It's expected to be announced this afternoon. German-born Balogun is hugely experienced having been capped 32 times for Nigeria, who he qualifies to play for through his father 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Golden Gordon Posted July 24, 2020 Share Posted July 24, 2020 12 minutes ago, bennett said: Possible defensive cover if this article is correct, with Katic and Helander injured we're thin at the back. RANGERS have agreed a deal to sign Nigeria international defender Leon Balogun. SunSport can reveal the 32 year-old centre-back will sign a two-year contract to move to Ibrox. Gers have been searching for a new stopper with Nikola Katic out injured and facing months on the sidelines. Balogun is a free agent after his contract with Brighton expired at the end of the season It's expected to be announced this afternoon. German-born Balogun is hugely experienced having been capped 32 times for Nigeria, who he qualifies to play for through his father Seems like a mixed bag career-wise. Has hopped between first team & 'B' teams quite regularly & 215 appearances for a 32 year-old isn't a great return. Has played a fair few times for his country though, so could be wrong. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.