The_Kincardine Posted June 1, 2017 Author Share Posted June 1, 2017 1 minute ago, Monkey Tennis said: Your little montage however, shows that you endorse an association that exists and is quite ugly. Thank f**k. I thought we were deid. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted June 1, 2017 Share Posted June 1, 2017 2 minutes ago, The_Kincardine said: Thank f**k. I thought we were deid. How does that work as a witty riposte? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nacho Posted June 2, 2017 Share Posted June 2, 2017 12 hours ago, Jacksgranda said: The rules regarding liquidation were different then, AFAIUI if company and club are the same thing then hearts died in 1905, they didnt as the records show 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nacho Posted June 2, 2017 Share Posted June 2, 2017 12 hours ago, Ross. said: Agree that he done a good job for you. Solid but unspectacular which is pretty much what you want in a centre half. Expected you to keep him on but I assume he must have been on a heftier wage than most and Caixinha felt it would be better spent on Alves. we are planning to buy another first choice cb and keep bates and wilson as backup, no point keeping hill on 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nacho Posted June 2, 2017 Share Posted June 2, 2017 7 hours ago, kingjoey said: How sad are you? 1905???? apologies for pointing out what happened to rangers has already happened in scottish football and over 100 years of evidence exists of hearts being the same club 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nacho Posted June 2, 2017 Share Posted June 2, 2017 4 hours ago, sjc said: They were indeed plus all the shares were reissued to the same shareholders. Damn those Edwardian Hearts fans for letting our Club die though! great! - you are still a new club based on the club is the same as company gibberish that is the basis for the new club nonsense 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sjc Posted June 2, 2017 Share Posted June 2, 2017 2 minutes ago, nacho said: great! - you are still a new club based on the club is the same as company gibberish that is the basis for the new club nonsense Ok. A "new" club founded in 1905. How about yours? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nacho Posted June 2, 2017 Share Posted June 2, 2017 56 minutes ago, sjc said: Ok. A "new" club founded in 1905. How about yours? note the word gibberish in my last post, you are not a new club as 100+ years of being considered the same club shows, as already pointed out in a previous post - leeds , luton, rotherham, charlton, middlesbrough and bournemouth all went through the exact same process under the exact same laws as rangers and all are the same clubs, added to that the sfa, spfl, sfl, spl, eca, uefa all officially recognise us as the same club and they are the ones who decide our status as they are the governing bodies, added to that bdo and duff and phelps the admin and liquidation experts both say that club survived, hmrc, asa and the stock market all stated we were the same club and five high court judges and legal experts have all stated club and company are separate and the club continues on as before. every single one of those sources individually is more credible than anything the new clubbbers can provide to back up their arguments. the only actual things they have that say new club are 5 year old newspaper headlines and quotes from ex players, non expert, outdated opinons, added to that there are a few fallacious new club arguments knocking about, allegations, and ideas—for which no reliable published sources exist which don't prove new club in any way shape or form and are contradicted by the available evidence. -3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cerberus Posted June 2, 2017 Share Posted June 2, 2017 Total pish m8 -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sjc Posted June 2, 2017 Share Posted June 2, 2017 21 minutes ago, nacho said: note the word gibberish in my last post, you are not a new club as 100+ years of being considered the same club shows, as already pointed out in a previous post - leeds , luton, rotherham, charlton, middlesbrough and bournemouth all went through the exact same process under the exact same laws as rangers and all are the same clubs, added to that the sfa, spfl, sfl, spl, eca, uefa all officially recognise us as the same club and they are the ones who decide our status as they are the governing bodies, added to that bdo and duff and phelps the admin and liquidation experts both say that club survived, hmrc, asa and the stock market all stated we were the same club and five high court judges and legal experts have all stated club and company are separate and the club continues on as before. every single one of those sources individually is more credible than anything the new clubbbers can provide to back up their arguments. the only actual things they have that say new club are 5 year old newspaper headlines and quotes from ex players, non expert, outdated opinons, added to that there are a few fallacious new club arguments knocking about, allegations, and ideas—for which no reliable published sources exist which don't prove new club in any way shape or form and are contradicted by the available evidence. TL:DR I assume that all "same" Clubs have to reapply for membership to the SPFL? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nacho Posted June 2, 2017 Share Posted June 2, 2017 56 minutes ago, sjc said: TL:DR I assume that all "same" Clubs have to reapply for membership to the SPFL? who knows, any actual evidence that it means we are a new club from a reputable source - nope 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dons_1988 Posted June 2, 2017 Share Posted June 2, 2017 note the word gibberish in my last post, you are not a new club as 100+ years of being considered the same club shows, as already pointed out in a previous post - leeds , luton, rotherham, charlton, middlesbrough and bournemouth all went through the exact same process under the exact same laws as rangers and all are the same clubs, added to that the sfa, spfl, sfl, spl, eca, uefa all officially recognise us as the same club and they are the ones who decide our status as they are the governing bodies, added to that bdo and duff and phelps the admin and liquidation experts both say that club survived, hmrc, asa and the stock market all stated we were the same club and five high court judges and legal experts have all stated club and company are separate and the club continues on as before. every single one of those sources individually is more credible than anything the new clubbbers can provide to back up their arguments. the only actual things they have that say new club are 5 year old newspaper headlines and quotes from ex players, non expert, outdated opinons, added to that there are a few fallacious new club arguments knocking about, allegations, and ideas—for which no reliable published sources exist which don't prove new club in any way shape or form and are contradicted by the available evidence. At least you're not bothered 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nacho Posted June 2, 2017 Share Posted June 2, 2017 Just now, Dons_1988 said: At least you're not bothered i enjoyed a wee new club argument in the past, now its become tedious as the sevcoers havent come up with anything new in about 4 years and the evidence continues to pile up proving we are the same club 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dons_1988 Posted June 2, 2017 Share Posted June 2, 2017 i enjoyed a wee new club argument in the past, now its become tedious as the sevcoers havent come up with anything new in about 4 years and the evidence continues to pile up proving we are the same club You're right, it is tedious. Remind me, why are you still posting about it? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nacho Posted June 2, 2017 Share Posted June 2, 2017 Just now, Dons_1988 said: You're right, it is tedious. Remind me, why are you still posting about it? because new club morons still think they can post gibberish about it without it being pointed out in explicit detail how thick they are being 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sjc Posted June 2, 2017 Share Posted June 2, 2017 34 minutes ago, nacho said: who knows, any actual evidence that it means we are a new club from a reputable source - nope You mean apart from having to apply to join the SPFL? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The OP Posted June 2, 2017 Share Posted June 2, 2017 8 hours ago, The_Kincardine said: Some of us speak English. I know this is rare among the shower you support. Talk me through, "posthumously pretending". Try and make it to appear that you're anything but a simpleton. I know this will be tricky for you. It's a perfectly cromulent phrase. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dons_1988 Posted June 2, 2017 Share Posted June 2, 2017 because new club morons still think they can post gibberish about it without it being pointed out in explicit detail how thick they are being No offence m9 but you've not offered any explicit detail, you just listed a few sources that affirm your own opinion/desire.I don't particularly care about the old club/new club debate but for your info, those that repeat it on here are looking for people like you to work yourself into a frenzy about it and post repeatedly about how wrong they are. Thankfully you haven't fallen into that trap. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue92 Posted June 2, 2017 Share Posted June 2, 2017 I don't get irked because folk think we are a new club, that is their prerogative. Its just that when folk regurgitate the same thing on every Rangers thread, it just becomes boring. It's really that simple. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RandomGuy. Posted June 2, 2017 Share Posted June 2, 2017 TBF you could have easily avoided all this by actually making an effort to save the old Rangers, instead of sitting behind your computers blaming everyone else. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.