Jump to content

The Official Former President Trump thread


banana

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, BTFD said:

I'm a bit surprised that Trumpy allows the missus to share in any of his grift money.

Wonder if it went into a joint account.

Hush money. He knows the Prenup is a potential issue that might encourage Melania to turn on him. The Constitutional protection against compelling a spouse to testify against someone is at the option of the spouse, not the defendant. Payment from the PAC in this way is work income and thus allows her to bank a decent amount ($66,000) into a Sep IRA retirement account, another $7,000 or so into a Roth IRA, and the rest can be placed into investments. That accounts, after the taxes, for about 70%+ of that “income”…a nice little contribution to funds The Donald has no claim to or control over. It may seem minor, but there’s a few very good reasons she’d want stuff like that. If you figure she’s received such income for the last 7-8 years from his PAC’s, that’s a cool half a million she’s got stashed above and beyond other considerations.

Remember, she was on a very limited Prenup until she renegotiated the Prenup in 2017 before moving into the White House. She’s not stupid, and she certainly isn’t relying on Donald for security…and she feels his cult needs to see her supporting him to preserve the illusion. That’s why she’s getting more leverage as time goes by, and he’s got to keep her well paid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jared Kushner has appeared before the grand jury looking into Trump’s attempt to overturn the result of the 2020 election.

How can you be in a room with this guy and not want to punch him in the face repeatedly?

IMG_1037.webp.17136e216a1c21d3e7ac860037704c58.webp

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Granny Danger said:

Jared Kushner has appeared before the grand jury looking into Trump’s attempt to overturn the result of the 2020 election.

How can you be in a room with this guy and not want to punch him in the face repeatedly?

IMG_1037.webp.17136e216a1c21d3e7ac860037704c58.webp

That building that the Qataris chucked him the mystery $2bn at on 666th 5th Avenue? There’s a Uniqlo in there that I bought a pair of pants from to replace the ones I’d sharted, brutally hungover, on the Hoboken-NYC ferry last year. So just on basis of that, I’d do him a solid. Or more solid than then, anyway. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Granny Danger said:

Jared Kushner has appeared before the grand jury looking into Trump’s attempt to overturn the result of the 2020 election.

How can you be in a room with this guy and not want to punch him in the face repeatedly?

IMG_1037.webp.17136e216a1c21d3e7ac860037704c58.webp

Can we punch her in the face too?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, TxRover said:

Hush money. He knows the Prenup is a potential issue that might encourage Melania to turn on him. The Constitutional protection against compelling a spouse to testify against someone is at the option of the spouse, not the defendant. Payment from the PAC in this way is work income and thus allows her to bank a decent amount ($66,000) into a Sep IRA retirement account, another $7,000 or so into a Roth IRA, and the rest can be placed into investments. That accounts, after the taxes, for about 70%+ of that “income”…a nice little contribution to funds The Donald has no claim to or control over. It may seem minor, but there’s a few very good reasons she’d want stuff like that. If you figure she’s received such income for the last 7-8 years from his PAC’s, that’s a cool half a million she’s got stashed above and beyond other considerations.

Remember, she was on a very limited Prenup until she renegotiated the Prenup in 2017 before moving into the White House. She’s not stupid, and she certainly isn’t relying on Donald for security…and she feels his cult needs to see her supporting him to preserve the illusion. That’s why she’s getting more leverage as time goes by, and he’s got to keep her well paid.

MajesticThreadbareCrane-max-1mb.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, BTFD said:

MajesticThreadbareCrane-max-1mb.gif

We knew that when she held Donald hostage to rewrite the Prenup in 2017. Despite denials, the details leaked out...she had Barron added into a more equal status to the other three misfit toys and equal inheritence. Likely also increased he own payout too. And all a taxpayer expense, as the Secret Service had to maintain Manhatten based agents to protect her at great expense...to the Secret Service, income to Donald.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Salt n Vinegar said:

Anyone who can't see the brilliance of that shot is spreading fake news.

... and anyway the Democrats and NASA changed gravity with their heathen "science".

Jack Smith, Fanni Willis and Alvin Bragg have all recently invested in a golf ball attracter with subsidies from Joe Biden’s Marxist government.  Coincidence?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Salt n Vinegar said:

Anyone who can't see the brilliance of that shot is spreading fake news.

Precisely. If anything, that shot proves that the earth is indeed flat and the gravity was simply pulling it closer to the centre.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, carpetmonster said:

 

Is that definitely him? 

Edit: Googled it and a lot of mainstream media outlets reported it so looks like it's actually him. I love it, anyway.

Edited by FreedomFarter
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm sure Trump will be delighted at this support....

https://www.bleedingheartland.com/2023/07/15/new-iowa-mailer-dubs-trump-trailblazer-for-trans/

"A new group has sent a second mass mailing to Iowa households, purporting to praise former President Donald Trump as an advocate for LGBTQ rights. The latest mailer from Advancing Our Values, incorporated in late June, describes Trump as a "Trailblazer for Trans Rights!" and opponent of "bathroom bills," which prohibit transgender people from using facilities that align with their gender identity"

Somehow, I doubt that a fairly sizeable chunk of his support will be thrilled at these statements about his previous views. Wonder if he'll deny them as fake news?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...